Bisphosphonates used in the management of osteoporosis are usually well tolerated. The most commonly reported adverse effects are gastrointestinal (gastric irritation, oesophageal erosions, gastric ulcers, perforations, and strictures). According to one meta-analysis,4 oral bisphosphonate therapy may be associated with oesophageal cancer risk; however, this has not been found in two other meta-analyses.5,6 Medication-related osteonecrosis of the jaw (MRONJ) is a rarely reported adverse effect (refer to Section 5.3). The incidence of MRONJ is in the range <1–10 cases per 10,000 patients treated with oral bisphosphonates7,8 and 1.7 cases per 10,000 patients treated with zoledronic acid.9
Atypical fracture of the femur (AFF) also appears to be a rare adverse event, occurring at a rate of 3.2–50 cases per 100,000 person-years of bisphosphonate treatment10 (refer to Section 5.4). In a recent North American study, 196,129 women aged >50 years receiving bisphosphonates were followed for 10 years.10 The risk of AFF increased with longer duration of bisphosphonate use – compared with a treatment duration of less than three months, the hazard ratio (HR) for treatment duration of three to less than five years was 8.86 (95% CI: 2.79–28.20), and this increased to 43.51 (95% CI: 13.70–138.15) for treatment for eight years or more.10 Other risk factors were race (HR for Asian versus White 4.84; 95% CI: 3.57–6.56), decreasing height (HR per 5-cm decrement 1.28; 95% CI: 1.15–1.43), increasing weight (HR per 5-kg increment 1.15; 95% CI: 1.11–1.19), age (HR for age 65–74 versus >85 years 2.76; 95% CI: 1.62–4.72) and glucocorticoid use for 1 year or more (HR versus no glucocorticoid use 2.28; 95% CI: 1.52–3.43). Reassuringly, bisphosphonate discontinuation was associated with a rapid reduction in AFF risk and the absolute risk of AFF remained very low (1.74 fractures per 10,000 patient-years) compared with reductions in the risk of hip and other fractures with bisphosphonate treatment. For example, after three years, there were two bisphosphonate-associated AFF, compared with 149 hip fractures prevented and 541 clinical fractures prevented.10 The benefit-to-risk ratio of bisphosphonate use for osteoporosis treatment is therefore very favourable.
Concern has been raised about bisphosphonate use around the time of fracture due to inhibition of bone remodelling. The Fracture and Bisphosphonates trial was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial involving 15 trauma centres in the UK that randomised 421 bisphosphonate-naïve patients aged >50 years with a distal radius fracture to alendronate 70 mg once weekly (n=215) or placebo (n=206) within 14 days of fracture. Reassuringly, there was no difference in fracture union at four weeks.
Evidence Statement
Several good-quality systematic reviews have found that bisphosphonates (alendronate, risedronate, and zoledronate) reduce fracture risk. Few studies have directly compared different agents or classes of agents used to treat osteoporosis, and hence data are insufficient to determine the relative efficacy or safety of these agents.
Primary prevention of osteoporotic fractures with bisphosphonates
A pivotal systematic review12 included two RCTs13,14 that reported the effect of alendronate 10–40 mg per day on fracture risk in postmenopausal women without osteoporosis. Alendronate was not associated with a reduction in the risk of vertebral fracture (RR 0.45; 95% CI: 0.06–3.15) or non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.79; 95% CI: 0.28–2.24) compared with placebo. In one RCT,13 the mean age was 51.8 years, the mean T-score –1.8, and no patients had prevalent vertebral fractures; in the other RCT,14 the mean age of participants was 53 years, the mean T-score was –1.8, and <10% of participants had prevalent vertebral fractures. A Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis in 200815 reported a reduction in the risk of vertebral fractures (RR 0.55; 95% CI: 0.38–0.80), but no reduction in non-vertebral fracture risk (RR 0.89; 95% CI: 0.76–1.04) with alendronate therapy in one study (n=4432).16 In the Cochrane review, the mean T-score was –1.9, mean age was 67.6 years, and no patients had prevalent vertebral fractures.15 The fact that patients in the latter study16 were older by 15 years is likely to have contributed to the positive findings.
A meta-analysis of RCTs of risedronate17 in postmenopausal women (n=111 in one trial by Mortensen et al18) conducted in 2002 did not demonstrate reductions in either vertebral fractures (RR 2.44; 95% CI: 0.12–49.45) or non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.49; 95% CI: 0.12–2.03). A 2008 Cochrane review19 on the effectiveness of risedronate at doses of 2.5 and 5 mg per day for a duration of two years for the primary prevention of osteoporosis fractures included two RCTs (Mortensen et al18 and Hooper et al20) with 327 early postmenopausal women (mean age 52.6). The results were not significant compared with placebo for either vertebral fracture risk (RR 0.97; 95% CI: 0.42–2.25) or non-vertebral fracture risk (RR 0.81; 95% CI: 0.25–2.58).19 In the RCTs by Mortensen et al18 and Hooper et al,20 the respective mean age was 51.2 and 52.6 years, the mean T-score was –1.0 and –0.4, and 0% and 18% of subjects, respectively, had prevalent fractures.
Treatment of postmenopausal women at high risk of osteoporotic fracture
A good-quality meta-analysis including six treatment trials showed a reduction in the risk of vertebral fracture for alendronate compared with placebo (RR 0.53; 95% CI: 0.43–0.65), with no heterogeneity observed between trials.12 This translated to a number needed to treat (NNT) of 72 (95% CI: 61–99) to prevent one vertebral fracture over two years of treatment in women at high risk of vertebral fracture. The patients included were at high fracture risk, as indicated by a weighted mean age of 67.8 years (range 59.5–71 years), weighted mean FN T-score of –2.6 (range –3.3 to –2.3) and a prevalent vertebral fractures weighted mean of 29% (range 0–100%).12 Among five treatment trials included in the meta-analysis of non-vertebral fracture risk, the weighted mean age was 63.0 years (range 59.5–64 years), the weighted mean FN T-score was –2.7 (range –2.8 to –2.3) and the prevalent vertebral fractures weighted mean was 18% (range 0–21%). The pooled RR for non-vertebral fracture was 0.49 (95% CI: 0.36–0.67), with no heterogeneity between trials. The NNT to prevent one non-vertebral fracture over two years of treatment in women at high risk was 24 (95% CI: 19–37).12
A Cochrane review of RCTs in postmenopausal women compared risedronate 2.5 or 5 mg daily to placebo over 2–3 years.19 These trials were categorised as osteoporosis treatment (or secondary prevention) trials, based upon inclusion criteria of a T-score ≤–2.0 or the presence of a prevalent vertebral fracture. Pooled data from three RCTs showed a 39% reduction in vertebral fractures (RR 0.61; 95% CI: 0.50–0.76) for risedronate 5 mg per day with an estimated NNT of 48. The weighted mean age was 69.1 years (range 64.7–71 years), the weighted mean FN T-score was –2.7 (range –2.9 to –2.4) and the prevalent vertebral fractures weighted mean was 79% (range 30–100%).19 Pooled data from four RCTs showed a 20% reduction in non-vertebral fractures (RR 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72–0.90), with an estimated NNT of 30. The weighted mean age was 76.9 years (range 64.7–78 years), the weighted mean FN T-score was –3.6 (range –3.7 to –2.4) and the prevalent vertebral age: 42% to 100%. For hip fractures, there was a 26% reduction in risk (three RCTs; RR 0.74; 95% CI: 0.59–0.94), with an estimated NNT of 202. The weighted mean age was 77.3 years (range 69–78 years), the weighted mean FN T-score was –3.6 (range –3.7 to –2.4) and the prevalent vertebral fractures weighted mean was 47% (range 30–100%).19 The effect observed for 2.5 mg risedronate was not as large.19
The multicentre international Health Outcomes and Reduced Incidence with Zoledronic Acid Once Yearly (HORIZON)–Pivotal Fracture Trial (PFT) followed the safety and efficacy of zoledronic acid in a cohort of postmenopausal women with osteoporosis for nine years. In the initial trial, 7765 patients (mean age 73 years) were randomised to receive either placebo or a single infusion (5 mg) of zoledronate/zoledronic acid at baseline, 12 months and 24 months. At 36 months from baseline, zoledronic acid treatment reduced the risk of morphometric vertebral fracture by 70% compared with placebo (3.3% versus 10.9%; RR 0.30; 95% CI: 0.24–0.38) and reduced the risk of hip fracture by 41% (1.4% versus 2.5%; HR 0.59; 95% CI: 0.42–0.83).21 A post hoc analysis of data from patients who received only one dose of zoledronic acid at baseline revealed a similar reduction in vertebral fracture risk (68%) at the 18-month follow-up compared with placebo.22
Treatment following hip fracture
An annual infusion of zoledronic acid within three months after a hip fracture was associated with a reduction in the rate of new clinical fractures and improved survival in women and men with an average age of 74.4 years, followed for a median of 1.9 years.1 In that randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial, rates of any new clinical fracture were reduced by 35% (P=0.001) from 13.9% in the placebo group to 8.6% in the zoledronic acid group. The respective rates of a new clinical vertebral fracture in the zoledronic acid and placebo groups were 1.7% and 3.8% (P=0.02), and the respective rates of new non-vertebral fractures were 7.6% and 10.7% (P=0.03). There was also a reduction of 28% in deaths from any cause in the zoledronic acid group (P=0.01).1 No adverse effects on fracture healing were noted. The rates of renal and cardiovascular adverse events, including atrial fibrillation and stroke, were similar in the two groups.1 On the basis of that trial, the US Endocrine Society’s practice guideline for osteoporosis in men suggested treatment with IV zoledronic acid in men with a recent hip fracture.23
Duration of therapy
The Fracture Intervention Trial Long-term Extension (FLEX) trial demonstrated a reduction in clinical (not morphometric) vertebral fractures among those who continued alendronate for 10 years compared with those who discontinued after five years.24 A post hoc analysis revealed that among postmenopausal women without a vertebral fracture at FLEX baseline, an FN T-score of –2.5 or less at FLEX baseline was associated with non-vertebral fracture risk reduction (RR 0.50; 95% CI: 0.26–0.96).25 A further post hoc analysis of the FLEX trial showed that among women who discontinued alendronate after five years, the predictors of fracture were age (HR per five-year increase 1.54; 95% CI: 1.26–1.85) and FN T-score (lowest tertile of baseline FN DXA versus the other two tertiles relative HR 2.17; 95% CI: 1.38–3.41).26 Change in BMD after one year was not a predictor of further fracture.26
In an extension of the HORIZON–PFT study, 1233 women who had received three annual doses of zoledronic acid in the original trial were randomised to receive either zoledronic acid for another three years under the same annual, three-dose regimen or placebo.27 At the 36-month follow-up, the incidence of new vertebral fractures was lower in women who received six years of zoledronic acid than in those who had received the drug for only three years (14 versus 30 fractures; odds ratio [OR] 0.51; P=0.035), but there was no change in fracture rate in the placebo group.27 A further three-year extension of the trial did not show a significant difference in fracture rates between women taking zoledronic acid for a full nine years compared with those who had taken the drug for six years followed by three years on placebo.28 These results indicate that maximum benefit of zoledronic acid may be achieved in some patients after six years of therapy (for a reduction of vertebral fracture risk) and that for most patients the benefits are maintained for a further three years once therapy is stopped.
Treatment of osteoporosis in men
One RCT found a significant reduction (P=0.02) in the risk of vertebral fractures in older men with osteoporosis (n=241) for alendronate 10 mg per day for two years compared with placebo.29 The effect on non-vertebral fractures was not significant. An RCT to assess the effectiveness of risedronate 5 mg daily versus vitamin D/calcium in men with osteoporosis (n=316) with a baseline mean lumbar spine T-score of –3.3 and a prevalent vertebral fracture rate of 50% found a significant 60% reduction (P=0.028) in new morphometric vertebral fractures and statistically significant increases in lumbar spine and hip BMD at one year of follow-up.30 A placebo-controlled RCT of risedronate involving 284 men over two years with a baseline mean lumbar spine T-score of –3.2 and 25% of subjects with prevalent vertebral fractures demonstrated improved lumbar spine and hip BMD with risedronate.31 However, there was no significant effect on vertebral or non-vertebral fractures, although the study was underpowered to detect differences in fracture rates.31 Data on the efficacy of zoledronic acid in reducing fracture risk in men are rare. In a multicentre double-blinded trial of 1199 men with osteoporosis aged 50–85 years and randomised to receive either placebo or 5 mg zoledronic acid at baseline and at 12 months, zoledronic acid reduced the rate of morphometric vertebral fracture by 67% at the 24-month follow-up (RR 0.33; 95% CI: 0.16–0.70; P=0.002).32 The rate of non-vertebral fractures was also lower in the treatment group, but the difference did not reach statistical significance.32