×
We're aware of a cyber security incident affecting the electronic prescriptions provider MediSecure. The eRX Script Exchange (eRX) and the National Prescription Delivery Service (NPDS) continue to operate as usual and have not been impacted. Find out more and read our statement here.

Red Book

Overview

How to use the Red Book

The Red Book is designed to be used in a number of ways, all of which can be useful in day-to-day general practice. The Red Book can be used as a:

  • guide to establish who is most at risk and for whom screening or preventive care is most appropriate
  • refresher to check the latest recommendations
  • reminder to check at a glance what preventive activities are to be performed in various age groups and how often
  • checklist of preventive activities used according to an individual patient’s health profile
  • patient education tool, to demonstrate to patients the evidence that exists for preventive activities
  • study guide – a comprehensive list of references is provided in each chapter. This allows more in-depth information on a particular topic.

The information in the Red Book is organised into three levels. The first level is the lifecycle chart, which highlights when preventive activities should be performed and the optimum frequency for each activity. The lifecycle chart is organised by age and clinical topic. Simply check the column under a particular age group to see what activities should be considered for the patient. The preventive activities that are recommended for everyone within a particular age range, and for which there is sound research evidence, are shaded in red. Activities to be performed only in patients with risk factors or where the evidence is not as strong are shaded in light red or pink.

A copy of this chart can be downloaded and attached to the patient record as a systematic reminder for preventive activities. General practitioners (GPs) can also use it as a wall chart or keep it handy on the desk.

The second level is more detailed and presents a summary of recommendations in addition to tables that identify what preventive care should be provided for particular groups in the population. This edition of the Red Book adopts the existing National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) levels of evidence and grades of recommendations.64 Future editions will consider adopting the GRADE system (www.gradeworkinggroup.org) for evaluating the quality of evidence for outcomes reported in systematic reviews.

Recommendations in the tables are graded according to the levels of evidence and strength of recommendation. The levels of evidence are coded by the roman numerals I–IV while the strength of recommendation is coded by the letters A–D. Practice Points are employed where no good evidence is available. Refer to Table IV.1 for more information.

Coding scheme used for levels of evidence and grades of recommendation

Table IV.1

Coding scheme used for levels of evidence and grades of recommendation64

Finally, there is a third level of information, which is on particular disadvantaged population groups that may be at risk of not receiving preventive care and what should be done to increase their chance of preventive care.

  1. Britt H MG, Henderson J, Bayram C, et al. General practice activity in Australia 2014–15. Sydney: Sydney University Press, 2015.
  2. Australian Government Preventative Health Taskforce. Australia: The healthiest country by 2020 – National preventative health strategy. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2009. Available at www.preventativehealth.
  3. AEC223A781D64FF0CA2575FD00075DD0/$File/nphsoverview.pdf [Accessed 15 December 2015].
  4. Begg S, Vos T BB, Stevenson C, Stanley L, Lopez AD. The burden of disease and injury in Australia 2003. Canberra: AIHW, 2007.
  5. Cancer Australia. Cancer Australia position statements. Surrey Hills, NSW: Cancer Australia, 2016 position-statements/lifestyle-risk-factors-and-primaryprevention-cancer [Accessed 5 May 2016].
  6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Chronic disease risk factors. Canberra: AIHW, 2016. Available at www. [Accessed 3 May 2016].Council of Australian Governments Health Services. Promoting good health, prevention and early intervention. Canberra: COAG, 2006 [Accessed 15 December 2015].
  7. Department of Health. National Primary Health Care Strategic Framework. Canberra: DOH, 2013 nphc-strategic-framework [Accessed 18 March 2016].
  8. Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision. National agreement performance information 2011–12: National healthcare agreement. Canberra: Productivity Commission, 2011.
  9. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s health 2014. Canberra: AIHW, 2014.
  10. Vos T, Carter R, Barendregt J, et al. Assessing costeffectiveness in prevention (ACE–Prevention): Final report. Herston, Qld: University of Queensland; and Burwood, Vic: Deakin University, 2010.
  11. Mazza D, Shand LK, Warren N, Keleher H, Browning CJ, Bruce EJ. General practice and preventive health care: A view through the eyes of community members. Med J Aust 2011;195(4):180–83.
  12. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Chronic diseases and associated risk factors in Australia. Canberra: AIHW, 2006 [Accessed 5 May 2016].
  13. Gray JA, Patnick J, Blanks RG. Maximising benefit and minimising harm of screening. BMJ 2008;336(7642):480–83.
  14. Morrison AS. Screening. In: Rothman KJ, Greenland S, Lash TL, editors. Modern epidemiology, 2nd edn. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven,1998.
  15. Aldrich R, Kemp L, Williams JS, et al. Using socioeconomic evidence in clinical practice guidelines. BMJ 2003;327(7426):1283–85.
  16. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Smoking, nutrition, alcohol, physical activity (SNAP): A population health guide to behavioural risk factors in general practice. 2nd edn. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2015.
  17. Krogsbøll LT, Jørgensen KJ, Grønhøj Larsen C, Gøtzsche PC. General health checks in adults for reducing morbidity and mortality from disease: Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 2012;345:e7191.
  18. World Health Organization. Screening for various cancers. Geneva: WHO, 2008 detection/variouscancer/en [Accessed 3 May 2016].
  19. Wilson J, Jungner Y. Principles and practices of screening for disease. Geneva: World Health Organization, 1968.
  20. UK National Health Services. What is screening? London: UK National Screening Committee, 2015 [Accessed 6 January 2016].
  21. Bouleware LE, Barnes GJ, Wilson RF, et al. Systematic review: The value of the periodic health evaluation. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:289–300.
  22. Dolan M, Simons-Morton D, Ramirez G, Frankowski R, Green L, Mains D. A meta-analysis of trials evaluating patient education and counselling for three groups of preventive health behaviors. Patient Educ Couns 1997;32(3):157–73.
  23. Nutbeam D. Building health literacy in Australia. Med J Aust 2009;191(10):525–26.
  24. Trachtenberg F, Dugan E, Hall M. How patients’ trust relates to their involvement in medical care. J Fam Pract 2005;54(4):344–52.
  25. Ellis S, Speroff T, Dittus R, Brown A, Pichert J, Elasy T. Diabetes patient education: A meta-analysis and metaregression. Pat Educ Couns 2004;52(1):97–105.
  26. Lewin S, Skea Z, Entwistle V, Zwarenstein M, Dick J. Interventions for providers to promote a patient-centred approach in clinical consultations. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2002;4: CD003267.
  27. Mead N, Bower P. Patient-centred consultations and outcomes in primary care. Patient Educ Couns 2002;48(1):51–61.
  28. Rao J, Weinberger M, Kroenke K. Visit-specific expectations and patient-centred outcomes: Literature review. Arch Fam Med 2000;9(10):1149–55.
  29. Schauffler H, Rodriguez T, Milstein A. Health education and patient satisfaction. J Fam Pract 1996;42(1):62–68.
  30. Littell J, Girvin H. Stages of change: A critique. Behav Modif 2002;26(2):223–73.
  31. Ley P, editor. Patients’ understanding and recall in clinical communication failure. London: Academic Press, 1983.
  32. Steptoe A, Kerry S, Rink E, Hilton S. The impact of behavioral counseling on stage of change in fat intake, physical activity, and cigarette smoking in adults at increased risk of coronary heart disease. Am J Public Health 2001;91(2):265–69.
  33. Branch L, Rabiner D. Rediscovering the patient’s role in receiving health promotion services. Med Care 2000;38(1):70–77.
  34. O’Connor AM, Bennett CL, Stacey D, et al. Decision aids for people facing health treatment or screening decisions. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2009;3:CD001431.
  35. Warsi A, Wang P, LaValley M, Avorn J, Solomon D. Selfmanagement education programs in chronic disease: A systematic review and methodologic critique of the literature. Arch Intern Med 2004;164(15):1641–49.
  36. Ofman J, Badamgarav E, Henning J, et al. Does disease management improve clinical and economic outcomes in patients with chronic diseases? A systematic review. Am J Med 2004;117(3):182–92.
  37. Joos S, Hickam D, Gordon G, Baker L. Effects of physician communication intervention on patient care outcomes. J Gen Intern Med 1996;11(3):147–55.
  38. Hibbard J. Engaging health care consumers to improve quality of care. Med Care 2003;41(1 Suppl):I61–70.
  39. Bodenheimer T, Wagner E, Grumbach K. Improving primary care for patients with chronic illness. JAMA 2002;288(14):1775–79.
  40. Rosenstock I. The health belief model and preventative health behaviour. Health Educ Monogr 1974;2:27–57.
  41. Armitage CJ, Conner M. Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. Br J Soc Psychol 2001;40(Pt 4):471–99.
  42. Janz NK, Becker MH. The health belief model: A decade later. Health Educ Q 1984;11(1):1–47.
  43. Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: A new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci 2011;6:42.
  44. Cassidy C. Using the transtheoretical model to facilitate behaviour change in patients with chronic illness. J Am Acad Nurse Pract 1999;11(7):281.
  45. Cahill K, Lancaster T, Green N. Stage-based interventions for smoking cessation. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;11:CD004492.
  46. Prochaska JO, Velicer WF, Redding C, et al. Stagebased expert systems to guide a population of primary care patients to quit smoking, eat healthier, prevent skin cancer, and receive regular mammograms. Prev Med 2005;41(2):406–16.
  47. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Motivational interviewing – Helping people change. 3rd edn. New York: Guildford Press, 2012.
  48. Watt G, Brown G, Budd J, et al. General practitioners at the deep end: The experience and views of general practitioners working in the most severely deprived areas of Scotland. Occasional paper. Edinburgh: Royal College of General Practitioners, 2012.
  49. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian social trends, Mar 2010. Canberra: ABS, 2010 es30Mar+2010 [Accessed 29 April 2016].
  50. National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation and The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. National guide to a preventive health assessment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. 2nd edn. South Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2012.
  51. Harris M, Taggart J, Williams A, et al. Effective interventions to improve health literacy in the management of lifestyle risk factors in primary health care. Paper presented at 6th Health Service & Policy Research Conference. Brisbane: Health Service & Policy Research Conference, 2009.
  52. Rodriguez V, Andrade AD, Garcia-Retamero R, et al. Health literacy, numeracy, and graphical literacy among veterans in primary care and their effect on shared decision making and trust in physicians. J Health Commun 2013;18:273–89.
  53. Harris M, Kidd M, Snowdon T. New models of primary and community care to meet the challenges of chronic disease management and prevention: A discussion paper for NHHRC: National Health and Hospitals Reform Commission. Canbera: Australian Government, 2008.
  54. Adams RJ, Stocks NP, Wilson DH, et al. Health literacy: A new concept for general practice? Aust Fam Physician 2009;38(3):144–47.
  55. Karliner LS, Jacobs EA, Chen AH, Mutha S. Do professional interpreters improve clinical care for patients with limited English proficiency? A systematic review of the literature. Health Serv Res 2007;42(2):727–54.
  56. Belintxon M, Lopez-Dicastillo O. The challenges of health promotion in a multicultural society: A narrative review. An Sist Sanit Navar 2014;37(3):401–09.
  57. Ethnic Communities’ Council of Victoria. An investment not an expense: Enhancing health literacy in culturally and linguistically diverse communities. Carlton, Vic: Ethnic Communities’ Council of Victoria, 2012.
  58. Abbott P, Reath J, Gordon E, et al. General practitioner supervisor assessment and teaching of registrars consulting with Aboriginal patients – Is cultural competence adequately considered? BMC Med Educ 2014;14:167.
  59. Vass A, Mitchell A, Dhurrkay Y. Health literacy and Australian indigenous peoples: An analysis of the role of language and worldview. Health Promot J Aust 2011;22(1):33–37.
  60. Eckermann A, Dowd T, Chong E, Nixon L, Gray R. Binan Goonj: Bridging cultures in Aboriginal health. 3rd edn. Chatswood, NSW: Elsevier Australia, 2010.
  61. Ware VA. Improving the accessibility of health services in urban and regional settings for Indigenous people. Canberra: Australian Institute for Health and Welfare, 2013.
  62. Harris MF, Bailey L, Snowdon T, et al. Developing the guidelines for preventive care – Two decades of experience. Aust Fam Physician 2010;39(1–2):63–65.
  63. Development and validation of an international appraisal instrument for assessing the quality of clinical practice guidelines: The AGREE project. Qual Saf Health Care 2003;12(1):18–23.
  64. National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC, 2009 [Accessed 6 January 2016].
This event attracts CPD points and can be self recorded

Did you know you can now log your CPD with a click of a button?

Create Quick log

Advertising