Men’s health

April 2016


MTHFR genetic testing: Controversy and clinical implications

Volume 45, No.4, April 2016 Pages 237-240

Sarah Long

Jack Goldblatt


A polymorphism is a variant within a gene that does not necessarily affect its function, unlike a pathogenic mutation. Genetic testing for two common polymorphisms in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (MTHFR), 677C>T and 1298A>C, is being accessed by general practitioners (GPs) and alternative medicine practitioners (based on in-house records from referrals), and promoted through some pharmacies in Western Australia (based on the authors’ personal communication). Due to the large, varied and often conflicting data reported on MTHFR, these polymorphisms have been weakly associated with multiple conditions, including autism, schizophrenia, cardiac disease, fetal neural tube defects, poor pregnancy outcomes and colorectal cancer.


The aim of this review is to explain the difficulty in translating inconclusive results – and results of uncertain clinical relevance – of genetic-association studies on common polymorphisms into clinical practice. We will also explore why testing for polymorphisms needs to be reconsidered in a diagnostic clinical setting.


On the basis of the available scientific evidence, we propose that there are very limited clinical indications for testing for the 677C>T and the 1298A>C polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene, and that testing is not indicated as a non-specific screening test in the asymptomatic general population.

The MTHFR gene is responsible for the production of the enzyme methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR).1 Numerous studies have reported associations of MTHFR polymorphisms with an array of conditions including autism, schizophrenia, cardiac disease, fetal neural tube defects, poor pregnancy outcomes (eg preterm birth) and colorectal cancer.1–4 Over the past 24 months, Genetic Services of Western Australia has seen an increase in referrals for MTHFR polymorphism testing and counselling. Referrals have been received from general practitioners (GPs), obstetricians and alternative health practitioners. In addition, there have been cases of clients self-referring after a family member has had testing, or after a pregnancy loss or pregnancy with a neural tube defect (based on in-house records). Providers ordering testing for MTHFR polymorphisms are generally using the Medicare Benefits Schedule (MBS) item number 73308.5,6 However, this MBS item number is not specifically for MTHFR testing. It has the descriptor ‘Characterisation of the genotype of a patient for Factor V Leiden gene mutation, or detection of the other relevant mutations in the investigation of proven venous thrombosis or pulmonary embolism’.7

Scientific evidence and review

Folate (the salt of folic acid) is a vitamin the body needs for day-to-day functioning. It is required at higher doses during pregnancy, when it has an important role in preventing the formation of neural tube defects.8 Folate deficiency can cause glossitis, diarrhoea, gastrointestinal lesions, anaemia and poor growth.9,10

The enzyme MTHFR is involved in the conversion of 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate to 5-methyltetrahydrofolate, which is the primary form of circulating folate in the blood.11 5-methyltetrahydrofolate is involved in the remethylation of homocysteine to methionine, which is then converted to S-adenosylmethionine. This S-adenosylmethionine is then able to serve as a methyl donor in many varied methyl donor reactions throughout the cellular system.10,11

There are two predominant MTHFR polymorphisms, 677C>T and 1298A>C. In the general population, 60–70% of individuals will have at least one of these variants, 8.5% will be homozygous for 677C>T or 1298A>C, and 2.25% will be compound heterozygous. Overall, 10% of the population will be homozygous or compound heterozygous for these two polymorphisms.4,12

The MTHFR polymorphisms in the homozygous or compound heterozygous form only reduce enzyme production mildly and are thus of limited pathogenicity.12 The 677C>T polymorphism in the homozygous form may result in mild homocystinuria due to decreased MTHFR activity.13 The 1298A>C polymorphism does not cause homocystinuria in a heterozygous or homozygous form, but may affect enzyme activity when inherited with the 677C>T polymorphism.13

Severe MTHFR deficiency (<20% of the enzyme) results in the clinical picture of homocystinuria. This is a severe, autosomal recessive genetic condition that can present with early, significant neurological defects, or with gait abnormalities and psychiatric disorders later in life.12 This condition is not caused by the 1298A>C or the 677C>T MTHFR polymorphisms.

Neural tube defects

The important role of folate in the prevention of neural tube defects is well known.14 Intuitively, therefore, polymorphisms that interfere with folate metabolism could potentially result in an increased risk of neural tube defects. However, in practice, studies both supporting and refuting this hypothesis exist.1,15

Given the prevalence of the MTHFR polymorphisms (60–70% of the population) and the frequency of neural tube defects (approximately 1 in 1000 in Australia),14 it is unlikely that the polymorphisms alone have a significant role in the formation of neural tube defects. While there may be some increased risk of neural tube defects in individuals with the homozygous 677C>T variant,11 the level of risk has not been quantified and the impact of environmental factors, such as folate supplementation, has a more significant role. This has been demonstrated through a significant drop in neural tube defects when population-level fortification of folate occurs,14,16 with a decrease in the incidence of neural tube defects by about 70%.8

Practically, it would seem to be more useful to measure maternal serum folate levels and supplement as appropriate, rather than test for the presence or absence of the polymorphisms. Alternatively, measuring levels of homocysteine rather than MTHFR polymorphisms may give useful information regarding the risk of neural tube defects.17 Regardless of the mother’s MTHFR polymorphism status, 400 µg of folate daily for women of reproductive age is recommended.16 Thus, knowing a couple’s MTHFR polymorphism status has no effect on their pregnancy-related management in terms of the prevention of primary or recurrent neural tube defects.

Fertility and poor pregnancy outcomes (other than neural tube defects)

Hyperhomocysteinaemia in pregnancy has been associated with poor pregnancy outcomes,18,19 yet studies have produced conflicting results.20 In 2012, Bergen et al reported that high homocysteine levels increase the risk of prematurity, small size for gestational age and preeclampsia, although the P value was not significant for any of these associations (except for folate in the lowest quintile being associated with prematurity).21 However, even if homocysteine was conclusively linked with poor pregnancy outcomes, the MTHFR polymorphisms have been shown to result in only mildly elevated hyperhomocysteinaemia.13 Therefore, on the basis of the available evidence, genetic testing for either of the two MTHFR polymorphisms would not appear to provide any useful information as a substitute for, or in addition to, measuring serum homocysteine levels in this clinical situation.

MTHFR polymorphisms have been associated with a higher risk of preterm labour,22 but the findings have also been contradicted in different populations.23,24 Therefore, on the basis of association studies, MTHFR polymorphisms are not useful in predicting pregnancy outcomes25–28 or for the management of pregnancies. While sufficient folate is an important factor in preventing neural tube defects, increased folate levels in the presence of MTHFR polymorphisms do not seem to be associated with helping women undergoing in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment to achieve pregnancy.29 Therefore, testing for the polymorphisms may result in increased anxiety during pregnancy without any clinical benefit.


While homozygosity for the 677T>C MTHFR polymorphism is linked to an increase in homocysteine level, it is not clearly linked to an increase in thrombophilic events.26,30 MTHFR polymorphisms do not increase the risk of thromboembolic disease when found in a heterozygous state.30 Supplementation with folic acid and vitamin B12 does not significantly decrease the risk of thrombotic events.30

Cardiovascular disease

Increased levels of homocysteine have been associated with cardiovascular disease.10,31 The link was first hypothesised when children with severe homocystinuria were found to have vascular lesions.32 However, a meta-analysis of studies has found that the association was not as strong as previously believed.32 As stated above, while homozygosity for the 677C>T polymorphism is linked to a small increase in homocysteine levels, the increased risk of ischaemic heart disease and stroke is more closely related to the serum levels of homocysteine rather than the presence of the MTHFR polymorphisms. Importantly, there seems to be no increased risk of mortality from cardiovascular disease to MTHFR 677C>T homozygotes.11

Mental illness

Recent media attention regarding the tenuous link between MTHFR polymorphisms and depression and anxiety has garnered much interest from individuals living with these complex conditions. For example, a recent online newspaper article purports to provide an ‘easy’ fix for affected individuals, advising them that vitamin supplementation will ‘cure’ them of symptoms.33

Although some studies found evidence that MTHFR polymorphisms were associated with an increased risk of bipolar and schizophrenic disorders,2 other studies have found no convincing link.34–36 In one study, an increased rate of 677C>T homozygotes was found in a population with major depressive disorder. However, no differences in vitamin B6, vitamin B12 or homocysteine levels were found in 677C>T patients with a major depressive disorder, compared with those who were unaffected. The same study found folate levels in control subjects were higher than in participants who were depressed, but this difference was not found with statistical correction for demographics.35 There is no convincing evidence linking mental illness and MTHFR polymorphisms.

Marketing to consumers

The ethics of nutritional companies and alternative practitioners offering consumers genetic testing has been debated for some time, with concerns about the clinical validity of the results. The issues involve the role of single nucleotide polymorphisms in individual genes in influencing complex nutritional conditions and, most importantly, how consumers will use the information derived from this testing.37 The position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics in the US is that:

There is insufficient evidence regarding C677T polymorphism in the MTHFR gene to modify current folate recommendations from those provided in the Dietary Reference Intakes.38

Two examples of websites offering MTHFR ‘information’ are MTHFR Support Australia39 and from the US.40

Recommendations for clinical practice

Folate plays a vital role in cellular health, and the MTHFR gene has an important role in the folate pathway. However, we propose that there is no statistically significant evidence that the 677C>T and the 1298A>C polymorphisms have a clinically important impact on this pathway. The American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics has issued a detailed guideline that discourages testing for the two common polymorphisms in the MTHFR gene.11 The Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics states no dietary interventions are needed, even in individuals with homozygous 677C>T mutations who have elevated levels of homocysteine. As the 677C>T and 1298A>C polymorphisms occur at high rates in the general population, and there are no clinically significant interventions that could be offered to carriers of the variants in heterozygous, homozygous or compound heterozygous states, it is not useful to offer genetic testing for these variants.


Sarah Long BSc (Hons)(Biomed Sci), PostGradDip (Gen Couns), FHGSA, Genetic Counsellor, King Edward Memorial Hospital – Genetic Services of Western Australia, Subiaco, WA.

Jack Goldblatt MBChB, MD, FRACP, Clinical Professor, School of Paediatrics and Child Health, University of Western Australia, Genetic Services of Western Australia, King Edward Memorial Hospital, Perth, WA

Competing interests: None.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.


  1. van der Put NM, Gabreëls F, Stevens EM, et al. A second common mutation in the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene: An additional risk factor for neural-tube defects? Am J Hum Genet 1998;62(5):1044–51.
  2. El-Hadidy MA, Abdeen HM, Abd El-Aziz SM, Al-Harrass M. MTHFR gene polymorphism and age of onset of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Biomed Res Int 2014;2014:318483.
  3. De Marco P, Calevo MG, Moroni A, et al. Polymorphisms in genes involved in folate metabolism as risk factors for NTDs. Eur J Pediatr Surg 2001;11 Suppl 1:S14–17.
  4. Wilcken B, Bamforth F, Li Z, et al. Geographical and ethnic variation of the 677C>T allele of 5,10 methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR): Findings from over 7000 newborns from 16 areas world wide. J Med Genet 2003;40(8):
  5. Healthscope Pathology. MTHFR gene test (Folate deficiency & High homocysteine levels). Australia: Healthscope Pathology, 2015. Available at [Accessed 13 August 2014].
  6. Sonic Healthcare. MTHFR screen. Australia: Sonic Healthcare, 2015. Available at [Accessed 5 October 2015].
  7. Department of Health. Medicare Benefits Schedule. Phillip, ACT: DoH, 2015. Available at [Accessed 13 August 2014].
  8. MRC Vitamin Study Research Group. Prevention of neural tube defects: Results of the Medical Research Council Vitamin Study. Lancet 1991;338(8760):131–37.
  9. Mosby. Mosby’s medical dictionary. St Louis, MO: Elsevier, 2006.
  10. Blom HJ, Smulders Y. Overview of homocysteine and folate metabolism. With special references to cardiovascular disease and neural tube defects. J Inherit Metab Dis 2011;34(1):75–81.
  11. Hickey SE, Curry CJ, Toriello HV. ACMG practice guideline: Lack of evidence for MTHFR polymorphism testing. Genet Med 2013;15(2):153–56.
  12. Burda P, Schäfer A, Suormala T, et al. Insights into severe 5,10-methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase deficiency: Molecular genetic and enzymatic characterization of 76 patients. Hum Mutat 2015;36(6):611–21.
  13. Ogino S, Wilson R. Genotype and haplotype distributions of MTHFR677C>T and 1298A>C single nucleotide polymorphisms: A meta-analysis. J Hum Genet 2003;48(1):1–7.
  14. Bower C. Prevention of neural tube defects with folate. J Paediatr Child Health 2013;49(1):2–4.
  15. Mornet E, Muller F, Lenvoisé-Furet A, et al. Screening of the C677T mutation on the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene in French patients with neural tube defects. Hum Genet 1997;100(5–6):512–14.
  16. Williams J, Mai CT, Mulinare J, et al. Updated estimates of neural tube defects prevented by mandatory folic acid fortification — United States, 1995–2011. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR) 2015;64(1):1–5.
  17. Zhao W, Mosley BS, Cleves MA, Melnyk S, James SJ, Hobbs CA. Neural tube defects and maternal biomarkers of folate, homocysteine, and glutathione metabolism. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol 2006;76(4):230–36.
  18. Chedraui P, Salazar-Pousada D, Villao A, et al. Polymorphisms of the methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene (C677T and A1298C) in nulliparous women complicated with preeclampsia. Gynecol Endocrinol 2014;30(5):392–96.
  19. López-Alarcón M, Montalvo-Velarde I, Vital-Reyes VS, Hinojosa-Cruz JC, Leaños-Miranda A, Martínez-Basila A. Serial determinations of asymmetric dimethylarginine and homocysteine during pregnancy to predict pre-eclampsia: A longitudinal study. BJOG 2015;122(12):1586–92.
  20. Hogg BB, Tamura T, Johnston KE, Dubard MB, Goldenberg RL. Second-trimester plasma homocysteine levels and pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, and intrauterine growth restriction. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2000;183(4):805–09.
  21. Bergen NE, Jaddoe VW, Timmermans S, et al. Homocysteine and folate concentrations in early pregnancy and the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes: The Generation R Study. BJOG 2012;119(6):739–51.
  22. Tiwari D, Bose PD, Das S, Das CR, Datta R, Bose S. MTHFR (C677T) polymorphism and PR (PROGINS) mutation as genetic factors for preterm delivery, fetal death and low birth weight: A Northeast Indian population based study. Meta Gene 2015;3:31–42.
  23. Gibson CS, MacLennan AH, Janssen NG. Associations between fetal inherited thrombophilia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2006;194(4):947.e1–10.
  24. Lauszus FF, Grøn PL, Klebe JG. Association of polymorphism of methylene-tetrahydro-folate-reductase with urinary albumin excretion rate in type 1 diabetes mellitus but not with preeclampsia, retinopathy, and preterm delivery. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2001;80(9):803–06.
  25. Puri M, Kaur L, Walia GK, et al. MTHFR C677T polymorphism, folate, vitamin B12 and homocysteine in recurrent pregnancy losses: A case control study among North Indian women. J Perinat Med 2013;41(5):549–54.
  26. Nadir Y, Hoffman R, Brenner B. Association of homocysteine, vitamin B12, folic acid, and MTHFR C677T in patients with a thrombotic event or recurrent fetal loss. Ann Hematol 2007;86(1):35–40.
  27. Boas WV, Gonçalves RO, Costa OL, Goncalves MS. Metabolism and gene polymorphisms of the folate pathway in Brazilian women with history of recurrent abortion. Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet 2015;37(2):71–76.
  28. Rai V. Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene A1298C polymorphism and susceptibility to recurrent pregnancy loss: A meta-analysis. Cell Mol Biol (Noisy-le-grand) 2014;60(2):27–34.
  29. Murto T, Kallak TK, Hoas A, et al. Folic acid supplementation and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) gene variations in relation to in vitro fertilization pregnancy outcome. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 2015;94(1):65–71.
  30. Scifres CM, Macones GA. The utility of thrombophilia testing in pregnant women with thrombosis: Fact or fiction? Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008;199(4):344 e1–7.
  31. Smulders YM, Blom HJ. The homocysteine controversy. J Inherited Metab Dis 2011;34(1):93–99.
  32. Homocysteine Studies Collaboration. Homocysteine and risk of ischemic heart disease and stroke: A meta-analysis. JAMA 2002;288(16):2015–22.
  33. Black E. How a vitamin cured my anxiety: Elisa Black’s story of lifelong struggle and new hope for the future. The Advertiser [Adelaide]. 11 March 2015.
  34. Cohen-Woods S, Graig I, Gaysina D, et al. The Bipolar Association Case-Control Study (BACCS) and meta-analysis: No association with the 5,10-Methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase gene and bipolar disorder. Am J Med Genet B Neuropsychiatr Genet 2010;153B(7):1298–304.
  35. Lok A, Mocking RJ, Assies J, et al. The one-carbon-cycle and methylenetetrahydrofolate reductase (MTHFR) C677T polymorphism in recurrent major depressive disorder; influence of antidepressant use and depressive state? J Affect Disord 2014;166:115–23.
  36. Permoda-Osip A, Dmitrzak-Weglarz M, Hauser J, Rybakowski JK. Are genes connected with homocysteine metabolism associated with bipolar disorder? Neuropsychobiology 2014;69(2):107–11.
  37. San-Cristobal R, Milagro FI, Martinez JA. Future challenges and present ethical considerations in the use of personalized nutrition based on genetic advice. J Acad Nutr Diet 2013;113(11):1447–54.
  38. Camp KM, Trujillo E. Position of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics: Nutritional genomics. J Acad Nutr Diet 2014;114(2):299–312.
  39. MTHFR Support Australia. Neutral Bay, NSW: MTHFR Support Australia, 2015. Available at [Accessed 7 March 2015].
  40. MTHFR.Net. [Place unknown], 2014. Available at [Accessed 25 January 2016]. 


04 April 2016 07:06

Re: MTHFR genetic testing: Controversy and clinical implications

Marcus Hewitson



Thank you for this review article on MTHFR polymorphisms. I agree with the general suggestion that the role of MTHFR alone been 'overemphasised'. Methylation is a complex multi step biochemical process involving interactions between the folate & SAMe cycles and transulfuration pathways, homocysteine being an important intermediate. The final pathway step from methionine to SAMe alone requires adequate methionine [dietary protein], magnesium [cofactor] and ATP [adequate mitochondrial function]. Assuming any 'methylation issue' is due to MTHFR status alone is thus inadequate and overly simplistic.
The primary importance of this cycle is the production of SAMe which acts as the universal methyl donor [in hundreds of reactions] and 'downstream' the production of antioxidant glutathione. Therefore the issue is not so much what [MTHFR] genes you have but what SAMe [and glutathione] levels you have. Many modern diseases share these cellular pathologies.
Jill James work [autism] and Duk Lee's work [global DNA hypomethylation secondary to persistent organic pollutants] exemplify the importance of methylation and there is emerging scientific consensus that an increasingly toxic environment is causal in diseases of modernity, possibly through increased antioxidant [glutathione] depletion and upstream methylation issues, including DNA hypomethylation. Various genetic SNPs could increase people's susceptibility to these stressors including [but not limited to] MTHFR.
Medical school and GP training tends not to teach the importance of these cycles [much of this science is recent] and indeed the importance of the underlying pathophysiology and cellular biochemistry. It is thus left largely to Internet pundits to popularise MTHFR testing without perhaps understanding the nuances or the potential unintended consequences of 'treating' SNPs with various nutrients, a reductionist in approach to a complex problem.
I commend you for writing this article and raising these issues with Australian GPs. Those GPs interested can explore further training in this exciting science through various local colleges.

Yes     No

Declaration of competing interests *

Yes No

Additional Author (remove)

Yes No






Competing Interests: 

Your comment is being submitted, please wait


Download citation in RIS format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

Download citation in BIBTEX format (RefMan)

Download citation in REFER format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

For more information see Wikipedia: Comparison of reference management software