Sports medicine

July 2016

Up front

Letters to the editor

Volume 45, No.7, July 2016 Pages 458-460

The opinions expressed by correspondents in this column are in no way endorsed by the Editors or The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.

Management of gout

In their article discussing gout, Drs Robinson and Stamp advise using non‑steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) as first-line treatment for acute gout (AFP May 2016).1 I did this for my first 25 years in general practice but for the last 15 years have used nothing but prednisone.

Patients will report that improvement in pain and swelling occurs within hours, as opposed to days with NSAIDs. In many cases, they need only 25 mg at 12-hourly intervals for three or four doses. I have never encountered any side effects with this regime apart from reminding patients with diabetes that their glucose levels will rise for a short time.

I am in agreement with the authors that, when initiating allopurinol, it is essential to use NSAIDs concurrently (eg diclofenac 50 mg daily or twice daily for the first six weeks or so) to prevent flare-ups of gout.

When used appropriately, prednisone truly is a desert island drug.

John Golder, General Practitioner
Redlands Clinic, Cleveland, Qld

References

  1. Robinson PC, Stamp LK. The management of gout: Much has changed. Aust Fam Physician 2016;45(5):299–302.

Reply

We thank Dr Golder for his correspondence related to our gout management article.2 The American College of Rheumatology recommends the use of corticosteroids, NSAIDs or colchicine as first-line treatment, and advises clinicians to make a decision based on the number of involved joints and severity.3 We agree with Dr Golder that steroids can be very effective in the management of gout and are a useful therapeutic option.

Regarding Dr Golder’s observation of corticosteroid superiority, this question has been addressed in a large trial involving 120 patients, which compared naproxen 500 mg twice a day and prednisone 35 mg daily over five days and found no difference.4

The choice of agent should be guided by the patients’ comorbidities and concomitant medications, and for patients with contraindications to NSAIDs or colchicine, corticosteroids are particularly useful.

Philip C Robinson
University of Queensland School of Medicine, Brisbane, Qld,
Department of Rheumatology, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Qld

Lisa K Stamp
Department of Medicine, University of Otago, Christchurch, New Zealand
Department of Rheumatology, Christchurch Hospital, Christchurch, New Zealand

References

  1. Robinson PC, Stamp LK. The management of gout: Much has changed. Aust Fam Physician 2016;45(5):299–302.
  2. Khanna D, Khanna PP, Fitzgerald JD, et al. 2012 American College of Rheumatology guidelines for management of gout. Part 2: therapy and antiinflammatory prophylaxis of acute gouty arthritis. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken) 2012;64:1447–61.
  3. Janssens HJ, Janssen M, van de Lisdonk EH, van Riel PL, van Weel C. Use of oral prednisolone or naproxen for the treatment of gout arthritis: A double-blind, randomised equivalence trial. Lancet 2008;371:1854–60.

Antidepressants as analgesics

Some important points are worth making in response to the article by Janakiraman, Hamilton and Wan regarding the use of antidepressants as analgesics (AFP March 2016).5 The cited meta-analysis of trials of duloxetine for neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia raised concerns of trial bias in that of 18 included trials, 17 were performed by the drug manufacturer Eli Lilly, and only two trials were conducted over periods longer than 12 weeks, one of which reported no benefit.6

In addition, fibromyalgia shows high placebo response rates to drug treatment. In a meta-analysis of 18 studies of four drugs, including duloxetine and pregabalin, in 3546 patients, Hauser et al7 showed that the ‘pooled estimate of a 50% pain reduction by placebo was 18.6%’.

I agree with the authors that research limitations need to be carefully considered before making clinical decisions. Unfortunately, the opacity of the trials, data, and even meta-analyses, makes this careful consideration a chore that few clinicians would readily take on.

David Main MBBS, BSc
Claremont WA

References

  1. Janakiraman R, Hamilton L, Wan A. Unravelling the efficacy of antidepressants as analgesics. Aust Fam Physician 2016;45(3):113–17.
  2. Lunn MP, Hughes RA, Wiffen PJ. Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;1:CD007115.
  3. Hauser W, Sarzi-Puttini P, Tolle TR, Wolfe F. Placebo and nocebo responses in randomised controlled trials of drugs applying for approval for fibromyalgia syndrome treatment: systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2012;30(6 Suppl 74):78–87.

Reply

We thank Dr Main for his valuable comments regarding the use of antidepressants as analgesics. As Dr Main has correctly mentioned, most of the clinical trails on the effectiveness of duloxetine in chronic pain management were performed by the manufacturers of duloxetine, which is a funding bias. Lunn, Hughes and Wiffen have concluded that there is moderate-quality evidence in managing pain in diabetic peripheral neuropathy with a dose of 60 mg and 120 mg of duloxetine.8

Serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine) and noradrenaline have been implicated in the mediation of endogenous pain-inhibitory mechanisms via the descending pain-inhibitory pathways in the brain and spinal cord. In view of this, duloxetine was evaluated in neuropathic pain, widespread pain syndrome (WSPS), chronic pain due to osteoarthritis (OA), and chronic lower back pain. There is wide inter-individual variation in response to duloxetine. The beneficial and harmful responses to treatments cannot be predicted for individuals with chronic pain condition.

A recent systematic review published by Finnerup et al showed serotonin–noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors to be moderately effective in managing neuropathic pain with a number needed to treat (NNT) of 6.40 (5.2–8.4). Duloxetine has been recommended as first-line management for neuropathic pain.9 In WSPS, there is lower quality evidence. The effect in WSPS may be achieved through a greater improvement in psychological symptoms than in somatic physical pain.

WSPS is a chronic pain condition in which the main features are widespread musculoskeletal pain and tenderness accompanied by a number of non-specific symptoms that include fatigue, headache, low mood, unrefreshed sleep, abdominal pain and cognitive symptoms.10,11 Pathophysiological hypotheses for WSPS are neuroendocrine dysfunction, neurotransmitter dysfunction and neurosensory dysfunction.11 Complete resolution of symptoms is, unfortunately, almost never achieved, but significant improvement can be obtained through adequate pharmacological and non-pharmacological management. The European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) published a series of recommendations in 2007.12 They stress the importance of a multidisciplinary approach to treatment of WSPS. Biopsychosocial, cultural and spiritual management with lifestyle changes, such as improving quality and quantity of sleep, avoiding emotional and physical stress, improving posture and body mechanics, eating nutritiously, building a strong support system, developing and maintaining a positive attitude, are recommended. Antidepressants are often used as they decrease pain and improve function. Specific EULAR recommendations on non-pharmacological management include heated pool treatment with or without exercise and, in some cases, individually tailored exercise programs (aerobic exercise and strength training). On the basis of the patient’s specific needs, relaxation, rehabilitation, physiotherapy and psychological support are also beneficial.12

It is also essential to consider the possibilities of hypothyroidism, polymyalgia rheumatica, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren’s syndrome, vitamin D deficiency and autoimmune conditions, as these may complicate the clinical presentation and remain a significant challenge for assessment and management.

Raguraman Janakiraman DIH, DPM, FIPS, FRANZCP, CertAdult Psych,
Private Consultant Psychiatrist and Pain Medicine Fellow,
Princess Alexandra Hospital, Metro South Service, Brisbane, Qld

References

  1. Lunn MPT, Hughes RAC, Wiffen PJ. Duloxetine for treating painful neuropathy, chronic pain or fibromyalgia. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;1:CD007115.
  2. Finnerup NB, Attal N, Haroutounian S, et al. Pharmacotherapy for neuropathic pain in adults: Systematic review, meta-analysis and updated NeuPSIG recommendations. Lancet Neurol 2015;14(2):162–73.
  3. Abeles AM, Pillinger MH, Solitar BM, Abeles M. Narrative review: the pathophysiology of fibromyalgia. Ann Intern Med 2007;146(10):726–34.
  4. Giamberardino MA. Clinical updates – Update on fibromyalgia syndrome. Pain 2008;16(4):1–6.
  5. Carville SF, Arendt-Nielsen L, Bliddal H, et al. EULAR evidence-based recommendations for the management of fibromyalgia syndrome. Ann Rheum Dis 2008;67(4):536–41.

Letters to the Editor

Letters to the Editor can be submitted via:
Email: afp@racgp.org.au
Mail: The Editor, Australian Family Physician
100 Wellington Parade East Melbourne VIC 3002 Australia

Correspondence afp@racgp.org.au

Yes     No

Declaration of competing interests *

Yes No

Additional Author (remove)

Yes No

    

 

 

 

 

Competing Interests: 

Your comment is being submitted, please wait

 

Download citation in RIS format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

Download citation in BIBTEX format (RefMan)

Download citation in REFER format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

For more information see Wikipedia: Comparison of reference management software

Type

Letters to the editor