Global Health

January/February 2016

End-of-life care: Proactive clinical management of older Australians in the community

Volume 45, No.1, January/February 2016 Pages 76-78

Liz Reymond

Karen Cooper

Deborah Parker

Michael Chapman

Background

Due to the changing demographics of ageing and death in Australia, general practitioners (GPs) are caring for greater numbers of people with advanced chronic conditions that will soon lead to death. GPs play a pivotal role in proactively preparing these people for end of life.

Objective/s

This article introduces GPs to a framework of care, based on a palliative care approach, which supports proactive management of end-of-life care for older Australians living in the community.

Discussion

Embedding the above framework into routine practice can help GPs deliver care, aligned with patients’ preferences, at the right time and in the right place. Experience has shown that implementing proactive management of end-of-life care can increase satisfaction with GP care and help GPs meet the clinical, legal and ethical challenges associated with caring for older patients with advanced progressive conditions.

In Australia today, most people live longer with more comorbidities and die an expected death from chronic, progressive conditions such as dementia, cancer and frailty syndromes.1 General practitioners (GPs) have an essential role in caring for these patients and proactively planning their end-of-life care. A framework using a palliative care approach can support GPs to develop proactive, patient-centred management plans that avoid the need for decision making in emotionally charged situations.2,3

Most older people would prefer and benefit from care focused on their unique goals and quality of life, rather than that aimed at extending biological life.4 This approach can prevent unnecessary and burdensome interventions, as well as unwanted hospital admissions, and support Australians who wish to die at home (reportedly 70%).5,6

Modern medicine and palliative care

GPs report they infrequently practice palliative care while, in reality, they care for many older people whose health conditions are likely to lead to death in the near future.7 Given this, it may be useful for GPs to reconsider how they define and practice palliative care.

Modern palliative care is considered pertinent to all who will die an expected death.8 For this patient cohort, early identification of needs allows the best quality of remaining life. Palliative care is influenced by increasing medical advances in disease-modifying treatments. Indeed, in contemporary medicine, the distinction between curative and palliative is blurred, creating challenges for clinicians and patients alike. There is no absolute demarcation point between curative and palliative intent. That point differs for each individual, and treatment decisions are influenced by patient factors such as medical condition, culture, related health experiences, religion, spirituality, personality and socioeconomic demographics. Research shows that, particularly for patients with a non-malignant illness, GPs are less confident to initiate palliative care, provide timely referrals to specialist services and discuss end-of-life issues.9 This can result in lost opportunities for patients to understand that death is inevitable, to plan for their deaths and to have those plans realised.

The framework of palliative care

The framework of palliative care (the framework; Figure 1) is a tool based on three prognostic trajectories. It was developed to support GPs to proactively manage their patients’ care as it transitions from curative to palliative, and to facilitate a high-quality end of life according to patients’ preferences. It was founded on work undertaken in the UK10 and Australia.11

Figure 1. A framework for palliative care of community-based aged care patients11

The framework commences by asking the question: ‘Would you be surprised if your patient were to die in the next 6–12 months?’ This is ideally embedded into routine practice in a systematic way; for example, at the 75+ health check, at a given time before or after entry into a residential aged care facility (RACF) or after an older person is hospitalised.

This question can be answered using clinical knowledge, personal knowledge of the patient, clinical intuition and/or by using clinical prognostication tools.

In the first trajectory (prognosis of >6–12 months), when the answer to the question is ‘yes’, the key clinical process is advance care planning. This is an interactive, ongoing process of communication between a competent person/substitute decision-maker and all carers, focusing on the person’s preferences for future care.

In the second trajectory (prognosis of <6–12 months), when the answer to the question is ‘no’, the key clinical process is case conferencing. This aims to identify clear goals of care so that carers are ‘all on the same page’. Case conference outcomes should be documented, translated into a management plan and shared with those involved in the person’s care.

In the third trajectory, a diagnosis of dying has been made with a prognosis of usually shorter than a week. The key clinical process is the development of a terminal care management plan to support the person to die at home or in an RACF.

Conclusion

The framework of palliative care provides the opportunity to improve clinicians’ mindfulness regarding proactive management of clinical needs that typically emerge in the last year of life. It supports communication between the GP and the patient and their carers/substitute decision-makers, thereby enabling informed management plans to be developed in accordance with the patient’s personal choices. Routine implementation of the framework may help to ensure that patients receive the right care, and at the right time and place.

Resources

The Decision Assist website (www.decisionassist.org.au) contains information about educational opportunities and resources to support GPs to care for older Australians living in the community with chronic life-limiting illnesses.

Authors

Liz Reymond MBBS (Hons), FRACGP, FAChPM, PhD, Professor, Deputy Director, Metro South Palliative Care Service, Metro South Health, Queensland Government, Brisbane, QLD. elizabeth.reymond@health.qld.gov.au

Karen Cooper BSc (Hons), PhD, Project Manager, the Australian and New Zealand Society of Palliative Medicine, Canberra, ACT

Deborah Parker RN, BA, MSocSci, PhD, Director, Centre for Applied Nursing Research, Ingham Institute of Applied Medical Research, University of Western Sydney, Sydney, NSW

Michael Chapman MBBS, FRACP, FAChPM, Palliative Medicine Consultant, Calvary Bruce, Canberra, ACT

Competing interests: None.
Provenance and peer review: Not commissioned, externally peer reviewed.

Acknowledgements

Decision Assist is funded by the Department of Health.

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Health of older people in Australia: A snapshot, 2004–5. Canberra: ABS, 2006. Available at www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mf/4833.0.55.001 [Accessed 1 April 2015].
  2. Mitchell G, Zhang J, Burridge L, et al. Case conferences between general practitioners and specialist teams to plan end of life care of people with end stage heart failure and lung disease: An exploratory pilot study. BMC Palliative Care 2014;13:24–30.
  3. Shaw KL, Clifford C, Thomas K, Meehan H. Improving end-of-life care: A critical review of the Gold Standards Framework in primary care. Palliat Med 2010;24(3):317–29.
  4. Swerissen H, Duckett J. Dying well. Melbourne: Grattan Institute, 2014.
  5. Scott IA, Mitchell G, Reymond E, Daly MP. Difficult but necessary conversations – The case for advance care planning. Med J Aust 2013;199(10):662–66.
  6. Foreman LM, Hunt RW, Luke CG, Roder DM. Factors predictive of preferred place of death in the general population of South Australia. Palliat Med 2006;20(4):447–53.
  7. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Causes of death – Australia 2012. ABS Catalogue Number: 3303.0. Canberra: ABS, 2014. Available at www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/3303.0main+features100012012 [Accessed 17 March 2014].
  8. Palliative Care Australia. Standards for providing quality palliative care for all Australians. Canberra: Palliative Care Australia, 2005. Available at www.palliativecare.org.au/portals/46/resources/StandardsPalliativeCare.pdf [Accessed 1 April 2015].
  9. Claessen SJJ, Echteld MA, Francke AL, Van den Block L, Donker GA, Deliens L. Important treatment aims at the end of life: A nationwide study among GPs. Br J Gen Prac 2012;14:e121–26.
  10. Gold Standards Framework. Available at www.goldstandardsframework.org.uk [Accessed 11 December 2015].
  11. University of Queensland. The palliative approach toolkit – Module 1: Integrating a palliative approach. Brisbane: UQ, 2012.

Correspondence afp@racgp.org.au

Yes     No

Declaration of competing interests *

Yes No

Additional Author (remove)

Yes No

    

 

 

 

 

Competing Interests: 

Your comment is being submitted, please wait

Download citation in RIS format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

Download citation in BIBTEX format (RefMan)

Download citation in REFER format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

For more information see Wikipedia: Comparison of reference management software
Advertisement loading...

Advertisement

Type

Viewpoint

2016