What practices need to know about the sixth edition


 

What practices need to know about the sixth edition


 


Why is the Standards for general practices (6th edition) being published?

The Standards for general practices (6th edition) has been developed to reflect contemporary general practice, support safe and high-quality patient care, and ensure the Standards remain fit for purpose in a changing healthcare environment.

The sixth edition aligns with recommendations from the 2021 Review of General Practice Accreditation Arrangements, incorporates feedback from extensive consultation and piloting, and has been developed in line with principles of the International Society for Quality in Health Care (ISQua), supporting alignment with international best practice.

While retaining the strengths of the fifth edition, the sixth edition places greater emphasis on outcomes, clinical governance, consumer engagement, quality improvement, use of clinical data, and emerging areas such as digital health technologies, artificial intelligence and environmental sustainability. It also improves the clarity, structure and usability of the Standards for practices and surveyors.


Will practices be able to choose to seek accreditation against the fifth or sixth edition of the Standards?

Further information about the transition arrangements, including timing and accreditation requirements, will be communicated by the Australian Commission on Safety and Quality in Health Care.

All practices undergoing accreditation will need to meet the sixth edition Standards following the determined transition period.

 

What should practices start doing now?

Early awareness will make the transition easier. Practices can begin by:

  • reviewing governance and risk structures

  • identifying responsibility holders (eg sustainability, AI if applicable)

  • ensuring policy version control processes are clear

  • reviewing how coded clinical data is used

  • familiarising themselves with the new structure of the Standards.


How does the structure of the sixth edition differ from the fifth edition?

The overall intent of the Standards remains the same: supporting safe, high-quality care in Australian general practice through practice accreditation.

The sixth edition has been restructured to improve clarity, usability and consistency for both practices and surveyors. It is organised into four standards:

  • Foundations of general practice

  • Clinical governance

  • Patient participation

  • Continuous quality improvement (CQI)

It also includes an optional standard for point-of-care testing.

Key structural changes from the fifth edition include:

  • a greater focus on outcomes, with criteria describing what practices are expected to achieve rather than prescribing how they must achieve it

  • clearer separation between requirements (criteria and sub-criteria) and guidance material

  • expanded guidance to support consistent interpretation and implementation

  • a simplified approach to aspirational content, with aspirational criteria clearly identified

  • stronger integration of governance, quality improvement and patient-centred care throughout the Standards.

While the structure has changed, many of the core expectations for safe, quality general practice are familiar. The implementation period following publication is intended to help practices become familiar with the sixth edition before accreditation assessments commence against the new Standards.
 

What is the purpose of consumer expectation statements?

The RACGP partnered with consumers in the development of the sixth edition to include consumer expectation statements that capture the meaning and importance of each criterion to consumers.  

These statements help to align the Standards with the needs, preferences and expectations of patients. They empower patients by giving them a voice in the Standards. They are not a requirement that practices must meet as part of accreditation.


Can ‘non-traditional’ general practices be accredited against the sixth edition Standards?

Yes, the expanded definition of a general practice introduced in 2024 remains in place under the sixth edition. The Interpretive guide for the assessment of non-traditional general practices supports practices in determining their eligibility for accreditation, including non-traditional service models such as mobile and outreach services, and services operating within residential aged care facilities or disability homes.

To be eligible, a practice or health service must:

  • provide comprehensive, patient-centred, whole-person and continuous care; and

  • provide services that are predominantly of a general practice nature (more than 50% of the practice's GPs' collective clinical time, and more than 50% of Medicare services claimed or claimable, relate to general practice).

Services that provide limited, episodic or non-continuous care are generally not eligible. This includes telehealth-only services, single-condition clinics like skin cancer-only clinics, or services that are not mainly led by GPs. For example, a women’s health service that offers full general practice care for women would be eligible. However, a service that provides a narrow range of services, such as reproductive health only, would not be eligible.

Practices should assess themselves against the definition before seeking accreditation. If a practice is uncertain whether it meets the definition, it can seek advice from the RACGP Standards team. Final determination of eligibility, however, rests with the accreditation agency under the National General Practice Accreditation Scheme.


What criteria are mandatory or aspirational in the sixth edition?

Most criteria in the sixth edition are mandatory and need to be met for accreditation.

The sixth edition includes a small number of clearly labelled aspirational criteria, which are not required for accreditation.

The sixth edition no longer uses the flagged and unflagged indicator approach from the fifth edition. Instead, all criteria are mandatory unless labelled as aspirational.


What new areas have been introduced in the sixth edition?

The sixth edition has been comprehensively revised to reflect contemporary general practice, emerging healthcare priorities, and recommendations arising from consultation, piloting and accreditation reviews. While many core safety and quality requirements are familiar, practices should review the sixth edition in its entirety, as changes have been made throughout the Standards. The table below highlights some of the key new or significantly expanded areas that were not previously included, or were not previously required, under earlier editions of the Standards.

Foundations

F1 – Defining and planning for the practice

The sixth edition strengthens the focus on practice planning, governance and risk management, recognising that safe, highquality care relies on wellfunctioning systems as well as clinical expertise. New criteria in F1 support practices to operate with clear direction, defined accountability and effective oversight of quality, safety and performance.

New criteria at F1 in the Foundations standard detail a need for:

  • mission, vision and values

  • strategic planning

  • operational planning

  • process to review and resolve ethical issues

  • identifying and managing governance risks.

The Standards hub article Defining and planning for the practice provides further information.

Refer to F1 criteria and guidance


F2 – Response planning

Emergency response and business continuity planning were already required under the fifth edition. The sixth edition consolidates these concepts into a single criterion and expands expectations to include preparedness, recovery, continuity of care and testing of response plans.

Refer to F2 criteria and guidance


F3 – Environmental sustainability

Environmental sustainability and climate resilience are new areas in the sixth edition. These criteria recognise the impact that environmental factors and climate-related events can have on patient health, continuity of care and practice operations. They introduce expectations relating to climate resilience, environmental sustainability planning and accountability.

The Standards hub article Environmental sustainability and climate resilience in general practice provides further information.

Refer to F3 criteria and guidance


F4 – Induction, training and supporting performance

The sixth edition expands expectations relating to role-specific training, ongoing competency, person-centred care, Medicare billing education and responding to abuse and violence, including family, domestic and sexual violence.

The Standards hub article Induction and training provides further information.

Refer to F4 criteria and guidance


F7 – Team culture, safety and wellbeing

The sixth edition broadens the focus considerably to include wellbeing, psychological safety, workload monitoring, violence and aggression, workforce retention, staff feedback and culture.

Refer to F7 criteria and guidance


F8 – Information management and digital security

The cyber security emphasis, digital governance role, cyber incident planning and broader ICT governance are all significantly strengthened compared to the fifth edition.

Refer to F8 criteria and guidance


F9 – Privacy and confidentiality

F9.A now includes additional requirements relating to privacy responsibilities, patient communication and data breach awareness.

Refer to F9 criteria and guidance


F10 – Digital health technologies

Practices need documented process for assessing, implementing and managing digital health technologies and must ensure patients are appropriately informed about their use.

The criterion also requires practices to ensure team members have access to appropriate technical support and expertise.

Refer to F10 criteria and guidance


F11 – Artificial intelligence

The sixth edition introduces criteria that focus on the safe, transparent and accountable use of AI, ensuring practices have appropriate governance, oversight and risk management processes in place.

The Standards do not require practices to adopt or use AI tools. The AI criteria are only applicable and mandatory for practices who use AI tools.

The Standards hub article Artificial intelligence and the Standards provides further information.

Refer to F11 criteria and guidance

Clinical governance

CG1 – Clinical information systems

Paper health records are no longer acceptable. Practices must use a digital clinical information system to manage patient health information. Criterion CG1.A acknowledges that hybrid systems may still be needed, for instance if the practice has patients at residential aged care facilities. However, all systems need to be digital.

Refer to CG1 criteria and guidance


CG3 – Facilitating complete patient health records

Facilitating complete patient health records broadly aligns with the fifth edition, while introducing several new requirements. The sixth edition asks for:

  • demographic and identification details to be recorded in codable fields

  • all active patient health records to include known allergies or a record of no known allergies.

Refer to CG3 criteria and guidance


CG4 – Provision of clinical and medicines guidelines

Antimicrobial stewardship and environmentally sustainable clinical practice are both new focus areas reflecting contemporary healthcare priorities.

Refer to CG4 criteria and guidance


CG9 – Infection prevention control, including reprocessing

The sixth edition requires practices that reprocess reusable medical devices to apply a risk-based approach in accordance with RACGP's Infection prevention and control guidelines or another model that meets the current Australian standard.

The RACGP Reprocessing guidelines FAQ provides further information.

Refer to CG9 criteria and guidance


CG10 – Practice environment

Multiple facilities-related indicators from the fifth edition have been consolidated into a single outcomes-focused requirement for practice environment. The sixth edition places less emphasis on infrastructure requirements and greater emphasis on whether the environment supports safe, high-quality care.

Refer to CG10 criteria and guidance


CG13 – Research

The sixth edition introduces clearer expectations around data governance, secondary use of data, data-sharing agreements and patient transparency.

This reflects the increasing use of deidentified general practice data for research, planning and quality improvement purposes.

Refer to CG13 criteria and guidance

Patient participation

PP4 – Informed consent

The sixth edition expands on informed consent requirements to include processes to obtain and document informed consent for clinical procedures and treatments (in addition to the existing requirement for when a third-party is present).

Refer to PP4 criteria and guidance


PP6 – Health promotion and preventative care

Health promotion and preventive care contains an environmental sustainability criterion, which asks practices to share information with patients about environmental issues relevant to the healthcare they receive.

Refer to PP6 criteria and guidance


PP8 – Consumer engagement

Instead of collecting 'patient feedback', as required in the fifth edition, practices now have a more flexible and outcomes‑focused approach. Practices are asked to actively engage with consumers – both formally and informally – to understand their experience and use that insight to improve care.
Formal methods might include things like structured surveys or consumer groups and informal engagement can be everyday conversations, opportunistic feedback, or digital insights.

The guidance materials provide non‑exhaustive examples of both formal and informal engagement methods, allowing practices to choose approaches that best suit their context.

The Standards hub article Consumer statements, engaging consumers provides further information.

Refer to PP8 criteria and guidance

Continuous quality improvement

CQI1 – Continuous quality improvement

The CQI standard encourages general practices to continuously evaluate, monitor and improve the quality of their services to enhance patient care and experiences. The sixth edition CQI standard now expects practices to:

  • run ongoing QI with defined performance indicators, and to report QI and performance data to practice leadership

  • undertake at least one quality improvement activity every 12 months, one of which includes the use of coded clinical data

  • capture team feedback and document improvements arising from feedback, complaints and audits.

The Standards hub article Continuous quality improvement provides further information.

Refer to CQI1 criteria and guidance