Dr Le has been providing a mix of face-to-face and telehealth services since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic. She decides to adopt a mixed billing model to cover practice costs. Dr Le works in a practice in MMM4 area.
Dr Le works 38 hours per week. On average, 30.5 hours of this is clinical time and 7.5 hours is spent on non-clinical work (e.g. paperwork, following up on test results, arranging care for patients at home). She sees around four patients per hour – a total of 122 per week. Dr Le bulk bills all telehealth services (approximately 50% of her caseload) and privately bills face-to-face consultations (50% of services), charging an average fee of $98.
As a result of this change, Dr Le’s weekly billings increase from $9,741.60 to $10,809.20. This is an extra $1067.60 per week. Her annual billings increase by $51,244.80 from $467,596.80 to $518,841.60. Dr Le receives 65% of her billings, resulting in earnings totalling $337,247.04 before tax.
*Scenario based on MBS items 23 (Level B attendance lasting less than 20 minutes), 91891 (Level B phone consultation) and 91800 (Level B video consultation), which all have rebates of $43.90, and the bulk billing incentive item 75873 which is $35.30 for MMM4. It is assumed the GP takes four weeks of annual leave per year.
Question: What percentage of your services are provided via telehealth (video and telephone)? How would introducing a fee for all face-to-face services impact your ability to run a sustainable business?
Other strategies to test:
- If you currently bulk bill telehealth consultations, what will happen if you privately billed phone consultation services?
- If you already privately bill telehealth services, what will happen if you increased your fees for telehealth?
- What would happen if you privately billed after-hours appointments?
Use the billing calculator and write your reflections below.
Download case study 2