×

Are your contact details up to date? Login to view and update your personal details for the next financial year.


02 April 2015

Patient safety must come first in any expansion of pharmacist scope

The health and safety of patients must come before the interests of retail pharmacists who want to expand into care best done by qualified GPs, the Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) has warned.

In a position statement released today, the RACGP sets out the potential risks to patients if the role of pharmacists is increased to include services such as vaccination, cancer screening, mental illness management and the treatment of prescription drug dependence.

RACGP President Dr Frank R Jones said the suggestion by peak pharmacist bodies to expand pharmacy services raised significant concerns.

“The suggested expansion of a pharmacist’s scope sets alarm bells ringing because all preventative health interventions should be provided within a general practice where GPs can lead healthcare teams and ensure the best quality care,” Dr Jones said.

“Unlike GPs, pharmacists do not have the appropriate diagnostic skills to identify all potential health issues that arise from a consultation, nor are they equipped with the skills to carry out opportunistic preventative care.”

Dr Jones said while the RACGP welcomed the participation of other healthcare providers in patient care coordination, it needed to be done in a general practice setting and led by GPs to avoid risk to patients.

“As GPs, our number one responsibility is to safeguard patient safety. When care is not coordinated by a GP, patients end up with fragmented care and there is a risk that patient records, including vaccination and health check data, may not be reported to the patient’s usual practice.”

Dr Jones said because pharmacies were a retail business, pharmacists had an inherent conflict of interest.

“Expanding the role of pharmacists could lead to prescribing patterns that are influenced, or perceived to be influenced, by financial factors rather than evidence. The high degree of separation between prescribing and dispensing in general practice allows for objective prescribing, free of financial interests. The reason this exists is to ensure patients’ needs come first,” Dr Jones said.

He said there was value in incorporating clinical pharmacists into general practice settings, with a focus on medication safety initiatives, but the RACGP did not support primary care initiatives in pharmacies with no link to general practice. 


Media enquiries

Journalists and media outlets seeking comment and information from the RACGP can contact John Ronan, Ally Francis and Stuart Winthrope via:

Advertising

Advertising