References

RACGP Assessment Framework
  1. Disclaimer
  2. References

Last revised: 22 Jul 2025

  1. Danilovich N, Kitto S, Price DW, Campbell C, Hodgson A, Hendry P. Implementing Competency-Based Medical Education in Family Medicine: A Narrative Review of Current Trends in Assessment. Fam Med. 2021;53(1):9-22. doi: 10.22454/FamMed.2021.453158.
  2. Lee GB, Chiu AM. Assessment and feedback methods in competency-based medical education. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2022;128(3):256-262. doi: 10.1016/j.anai.2021.12.010.
  3. Hays RB, Wilkinson T, Green-Thompson L, et al. Managing assessment during curriculum change: Ottawa Consensus Statement. Med Teach 2024;46(7):874–884. doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2024.2350522
  4. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural and Health Training Framework. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2024. [Accessed 14 February 2025]
  5. Chandra A. Ethical issues and proposed solutions in conducting practical assessment of medical students involving patients. Indian J Med Ethics 2024;IX(3):217-222. doi: 10.20529/IJME.2024.034.
  6. Valentine N, Durning SJ, Shanahan EM, Schuwirth L. Fairness in Assessment: Identifying a Complex Adaptive System. Perspect Med Educ. 2023;12(1):315-326. doi: 10.5334/pme.993.
  7. Downing SM. Validity: on the meaningful interpretation of assessment data. Med Educ 2003:37(9):830-837.
  8. Ajjawi R, Tai J, Dollinger M, Dawson P, Boud D, Bearman M. From authentic assessment to authenticity in assessment: broadening perspectives. Assess Eval High Edu  2023;49(4):499–510. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2023.2271193
  9. Ahpra & National Boards. A consistent baseline definition of cultural safety for the National Scheme. Canberra: National Registration and Accreditation Scheme; 2019
  10. Norcini J, Anderson MB, Bollela V, et al. 2018 Consensus framework for good assessment. Med Teach 2018;40(11):1102-1109. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2018.1500016
  11. Cheung WJ, Bhanji F, Gofton W, et al. Design and Implementation of a National Program of Assessment Model – Integrating Entrustable Professional Activity Assessments in Canadian Specialist Postgraduate Medical Education. Perspect Med Educ 2024;13(1):44–55. doi: Org/10.5334/pme.956
  12. Heeneman S, de Jong LH, Dawson LJ, et al. Ottawa 2020 consensus statement for programmatic assessment – 1. Agreement on the principles. Med Teach 2021;43(10):1139-1148. doi: 10.1080/0142159X.2021.1957088
  13. Tai J, Ajjawi R, Bearman M, Boud D, Dawson P, Jorre de St Jorre T. Assessment for inclusion: rethinking contemporary strategies in assessment design. High Educ Res Dev 2022;42(2):483–497. doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2022.2057451
  14. Long S, Rodriguez C, St-Onge C, Tellier PP, Torabi N, Young M. Factors affecting perceived credibility of assessment in medical education: A scoping review. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2022 Mar;27(1):229-262. doi: 10.1007/s10459-021-10071-w. Epub 2021 Sep 27. PMID: 34570298.
  15. Patil SY, Gosavi M, Bannur HB, Ratnakar A. Blueprinting in assessment: A tool to increase the validity of undergraduate written examinations in pathology. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2015 Aug;5(Suppl 1):S76-9. doi: 10.4103/2229-516X.162286. PMID: 26380218; PMCID: PMC4552073.
  16. Van Der Vleuten CPM, Schuwirth LWT. Assessing professional competence: from methods to programmes. Med Educ 2005;3(3):309-317. Doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2005.02094.x
  17. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.  Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Cultural and Health Training Framework. East Melbourne, Vic:RACGP, 2024. 
  18. Jones E, Priestley M, Brewster L, Wilbraham SJ, Hughes G, Spanner, L. Student wellbeing and assessment in higher education: the balancing act. Assess Eval High Educ 2020;46(3):438–450. doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2020.1782344
  19. Everymind. Every Doctor, Every Setting: A national framework to guide coordinated action on the mental health of doctors and medical students. Newcastle:NSW, 2019 [Accessed 11 April 2025]
  20. Abelson S, Ketchen Lipson S, Eisenberg D. What works for improving mental health in gigher education. Washington, USA:American Council on Education, 2023 [Accessed 11 April 2025]
  21. Baik C, Kennedy G. Assessment principles to Support Student Wellbeing. Centre for the study of higher education, University of Melbourne. 2024. [Accessed 11 April 2025]
  22. Finn GM, Tai J, Nadarajah VD. Inclusive assessment in health professions education: Balancing global goals and local contexts. Med Educ 2025;59(1):88-96. doi: 10.1111/medu.15535.
  23. De Jong LH, Bok HGJ, Schellekens LH, Kremer WDJ, Jonker FH, van der Vleuten CPM. Shaping the right conditions in programmatic assessment: how quality of narrative information affects the quality of high-stakes decision-making. BMC Med Educ 2022;22:409. doi.org/10.1186/s12909-022-03257-2
  24. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.  Progressive assessment and workplace-based assessment program guide, WBA tools, Early assessment for safety and learning (EASL). East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2024. [Accessed 14 February 2025]
  25. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Progressive assessment and workplace-based assessment program guide, WBA tools, Program objectives. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2024. [Accessed 14 February 2025]
  26. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners.  Assessments and Examinations Candidate Handbook, Part 2: RACGP Fellowship examinations, Introduction. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2024. [Accessed 14 February 2025]
  27. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Pre-Employment Structured Clinical Interview (PESCI) Policy. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2024.


 

Advertising