White Book

Chapter 4

Intimate partner abuse: responding and counselling strategies

Key messages

  • Intimate partner abuse is strongly associated with mental health issues, which should be treated by health practitioners with a good understanding of violence against women 3
  • Women and their children are at increased risk at the time of separation. This process needs to be carefully planned to maintain safety 65
  • Intimate partner abuse is an issue for the whole community. Health practitioners have a role to play 3and need to see themselves as part of the wider intervention – domestic violence services, legal, police, housing – that needs to occur to support survivors
 
Table 1

Table 1

Coding scheme used for levels of evidence and grades of recommendation 

Explanation
Body of evidence can be trusted to guide practice in most situations

Recommendation
A range of counselling approaches, including motivational interviewing strategies, provide support and are effective in assisting women to discuss safety and reduce depressive symptoms in general practice

Explanation
Body of evidence can be trusted to guide practice in most situations

Recommendation 
Health practitioners should offer to refer women who have post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and who are no longer experiencing violence for trauma-informed cognitive behavioural therapy (CBT)

Explanation
Body of evidence can be trusted to guide practice in most situations

Recommendation 
Pregnant women who disclose intimate partner abuse should be offered empowerment counselling and advocacy support by trained health practitioners

Explanation
Body of evidence can be trusted to guide practice in most situations

Recommendation 
Health practitioners should offer children who have been exposed to intimate partner abuse a referral for psychotherapeutic counselling or small group therapy

Once we have overcome the many barriers to identification ( Chapter 2 ), there is a role for ongoing follow-up, support and referral. GPs working in the Northern Territory need to be aware of the mandatory reporting requirements for domestic and family violence.

Key ingredients to effective engagement, counselling and support include:

  • continuity of care
  • a sensitive, non-judgemental approach to enquiry
  • a good understanding of available community resources and barriers that these women face
  • ongoing support  (refer to Chapter 2 ).

In a consultation with a victim of intimate partner abuse, you should:

  • demonstrate that you believe the patient
  • provide a strong statement that violence is never okay
  • make an assessment of their risk and safety (including any children) ( refer to Chapter 3 )
  • provide information about possible referral and support services
  • make an offer of ongoing support.

There are a number of challenges for GPs responding to intimate partner abuse, including feeling overwhelmed and managing personal experiences of abuse ( refer to Chapter 14 ).

A range of responding and counselling strategies may assist patients experiencing intimate partner abuse. GPs interested in mental health may undertake this work themselves – while other GPs will prefer to refer patients to domestic violence services, social workers, psychologists, women’s services, and other community workers. GPs need to decide on their own skill and comfort level in this area and seek further training and resources.

GPs working in rural areas, with fewer services, might offer their patients phone counselling through the national telephone service 1800RESPECT. They could consider offering access to this at their practice if the patient had no other opportunity to make a call or would be at risk if they tried to do this from home. This service can also offer help and information about services to the GP and practice.

This chapter outlines how we can respond to, follow-up and counsel our patients in a time-efficient manner. It also includes how to work appropriately with other services and refer to other practitioners to enable pathways to safety and healing.

The counselling strategies we use need to be:

  • effective
  • appropriate and possible in a GP setting
  • acceptable to patients and GPs
  • cognisant of the issues of disclosure and engagement.

In addition to safety assessment and planning ( Chapter 3 ), effective counselling strategies that can assist survivors include CBT, motivational interviewing66–69 and an understanding of the behaviour change process.70–79

Motivational interviewing (MI) is a patient-centred clinical intervention intended to assist in strengthening motivation and readiness for action.67 With intimate partner abuse, a woman’s ability to change her situation may be very limited. It is important that MI is done with safety as the foremost concern for women and their children.

One goal of MI is to elicit and reinforce ‘change talk’ from the patient.67,69,80 In MI, the focus is on reflections and questions on topics that relate to ambivalence and action – what might promote action and what makes it difficult or inhibits it. The skillful MI counsellor is attuned to change-relevant content in the patient’s behaviour and communication. Their thoughtful reflective listening statements help to facilitate action. At the same time, adopting the spirit of MI helps to affirm explicitly the client’s autonomy and choice with respect to what, whether, and how to change.

A core component of the MI approach is the MI spirit – a mix of skilful counselling style blended with a clear patient-centred approach. Key elements of the MI spirit include:69

  • A collaborative, rather than authoritarian, approach – the GP actively fosters and encourages power sharing in the interaction in such a way that the patient’s ideas substantially influence the direction and outcome of the interview. Gaining a better understanding of the patient’s ideas, concerns, expectations and preferences through using the MI approach increases shared decision making. Information is actively shared and the patient is supported to consider options and to achieve informed preferences.
  • Evocation – the focus is on the patient’s own motivation rather than trying to instil it. The GP works proactively to evoke the patient’s own reasons for action and ideas about how change should happen. All patients have goals, values and aspirations. Part of the MI approach is to connect health-related behaviour with the things that patients care about.
  • Honouring and respecting the patient’s autonomy – the MI process actively supports autonomy by building good relationships, respecting both individual expertise and competence and interdependence on others. Patients can and do make choices and it is ultimately their right to choose what they wish to do – patient self-determination is respected. Specifically, patients have the right to follow their own preferences and make their own decisions even if these are regarded as problematic by others.

MI is different to the transtheoretical model of behaviour change. The latter is intended to provide a comprehensive conceptual model of how and why changes occur, whereas MI is a specific clinical method to enhance personal motivation for change.81

The transtheoretical model of behaviour change (TTM) is commonly referred to as the ‘stages of change’ model and has been used in many clinical settings to determine patient readiness for action, including intimate partner abuse and other types of abuse and violence.2,82–84 While the stages of change model can be useful, transition through the model is not usually linear. External factors, for example, social isolation or a lack of finances, may inhibit a woman being able to make any changes to her situation. More importantly, there is limited rigorous evidence of the effectiveness of the stages of change approach as the preferred counselling approach for women who are victims of intimate partner abuse.2,83,85 It is preferable to maintain a degree of flexibility rather than adopting a rigid approach when choosing intervention strategies.86

The stages of change, as applied to intimate partner abuse, can be categorised into five components outlined below. It is important to keep in mind the limitations outlined above.

  • Pre-contemplative – the woman is not aware that she has a problem or holds a strong belief that it is her fault. Awareness is a key issue that you will wish to work on with your patient.
    • Suggest the possibility of a connection between symptoms and feelings of fear using the woman’s terms.
  • Contemplation – she has identified a problem but remains ambivalent about whether or not she wants to or, more importantly, is able to make changes. If the perpetrator is also a patient of the GP, this may generate ambivalence in the GP.
    • Encourage possibilities for change should she decide she needs them. Point out that you are available to help and support her on the journey.
  • Preparation/decision – the catalyst for change has arisen, whether it is concern for children or a realisation her partner won’t change. Change talk is more apparent.
    • Explore resources. Respect her decision about what she wants to do – for example, talk to family/friends/counsellor, leave the relationship, obtain a restraining order.
  • Action – a plan devised in the previous stage is put into action.
    • Offer support to carry out the plan and ensure safety planning is in place.
  • Maintenance – the woman’s commitment to the above actions is firm.
    • Praise whatever she has managed to do and support her decision.
  • Returning/relapsing – the woman may feel compelled to reverse action. Reasons include finding life too stressful, having limited or no access to children or resources.
    • Support her even if she returns to the relationship, doesn’t see a counsellor or fails to report abuse. Reassure her that this pattern of behaviour is common for women.

Getting started – raising the issue

Raising the issue can be challenging ( refer to Chapter 2 ). Women are not likely to disclose abuse unless directly asked87 and many GPs don’t ask.88 Understanding the factors that contribute to disclosure and engagement in discussion is the first step in the process. It is also important to have an index of suspicion, especially with some typical presentations. For example, it may be a patient you have seen for years for depression, persistent headaches or vague somatic complaints. Begin to explore the possibility that they are experiencing violence or have experienced violence in the past with general and then specific questions ( refer to Chapter 3 ).

It may be important that you simply suggest the possibility of a connection between what may be happening at home or in the past and their presenting symptoms.

Often people who have these types of health problems are experiencing difficulties at home. Is this happening to you?

Sometimes these symptoms can be associated with having been hurt in the past. Did that ever happen to you?

It is useful at this, and any, time to signal your support and acknowledgement that any violence is not acceptable. It is ineffective at this point to suggest leaving the relationship, but any message of support and identifying that alternatives exist, may be a trigger for action.2,72,85,87 Remember that women are at greatest risk of being a victim of homicide around the time of leaving. Therefore, planning when, and how, to leave needs to be done carefully to maintain safety.

There are a number of barriers ( refer to Chapter 2 ) to disclosure, particularly in small or rural communities – for example, not wanting the GP to think badly of the perpetrator, particularly if there is a family doctor who also sees other family members. There is often also a fear of repercussions and consequences, particularly in small, interconnected and isolated communities where anonymity cannot be maintained. Women in rural and remote areas may also find it more difficult to seek help or end a violent relationship. A range of factors may compound the isolation that survivors already experience as part of the abuse, such as:

  • access to services
  • concerns about maintaining confidentiality and anonymity
  • the stigma attached to the (public) disclosure of violence
  • lack of transport and telecommunications.89,90

Table 8 outlines some of the contributors to both disclosure and engagement.

Table 8. Strategies to increase disclosure, engagement and readiness for action in women who experience intimate partner abuse

Table 8

Strategies to increase disclosure, engagement and readiness for action in women who experience intimate partner abuse 

Exploring ambivalence

Many women who are abused express ambivalence about taking action, even if they have identified a concern (or perhaps even a problem).

Yes, I know my husband beats me occasionally, but in between he’s okay. He’s not nasty to the children and he treats me well.

Yes, my father was very hard on us … but we were really a happy family.

’Yes, but’ is the classic phrase associated with ambivalence. Part of the person wants to acknowledge the abuse and another part does not.

It is useful to encourage patients to look at possibilities should they decide to do something. Just pointing out that there are options, that violence in any form is wrong and that they do not have to put up with it, will help to establish trust, build self-esteem and identify you as a supportive agent.100

Whatever you decide to do about the situation, if you think I can help, please let me know. I am happy to discuss this with you and we can explore the options together.

To gain some understanding of how a relationship is perceived by your patient, you could get her to fill out a healthy relationship tool and motivational interviewing tool. Ask her to rate how the relationship is going, on a scale from 1 to 10. If she rates it as only 1 or 2, ask what she would need to happen to change this to a 4 or 5. This should provide some insight into what the woman thinks might contribute to a turning point.

Similarly, if she rates it as a 7 or more out of 10, try to get a more complete picture of her situation by asking her why the rating was a 7 and not a 2 or 3. This should give you a sense of why this relationship is important to the patient. Asking what would make it a 9 or 10 may also shed light on what else needs to happen. A decision-balance matrix is also a constructive tool to explore a patient’s ambivalence about her partner and the relationship.80 Emphasise that the reasons entered in the boxes should be her own reasons, not what someone else has told her.

The GP needs to consider both dimensions of exploring a ‘decision balance’ – the emotional as well as the cognitive. On an intellectual level the woman may have a clear understanding of her circumstances and may acknowledge that she should leave. However, the fear associated with leaving the relationship and coping alone may be incredibly strong, and she may feel emotionally ill equipped for the enormous physical and emotional effort involved in making the changes.

Fear and the sense of powerlessness engendered by intimate partner abuse can be a prevailing deterrent for survivors trying to move forward and away from abusive partners. Often regaining confidence and emotional strength can be a gradual process, so that even small advances are initially viewed as real hurdles. GPs need to be aware that moving out of an abusive relationship may take quite some time; sometimes years. The GP can be an important source of ongoing support and strength if they are non-judgemental of the rate of change and supportive of the decisions and choices the survivor makes along the way.

Useful interventions include:

  • affirming the abuse is occurring – that is, believing the patient
  • assessing the risk to safety of the patient and any children
  • assessing the level and quality of social support available
  • documenting the abuse
  • educating the patient about abuse and the cycle of violence and how it affects health
  • exploring options
  • discussing a safety plan
  • knowing resources for domestic violence support agencies
  • making appropriate referrals.

What finally prompts women to take legal action, leave or change?

Most victims have to begin to reject their own reasons for staying in the relationship. The abused woman needs to stop believing that violence is normal. This may be a greater problem with women whose own parents have been violent. In order to be able to leave or take legal action a woman needs to:

  • stop excusing her partner of being sick, mentally ill, alcoholic, unemployed or under great stress
  • stop blaming herself, and stop believing she is bad, provocative or responsible for the violence
  • stop believing and hoping that if she is good her partner will not abuse her
  • stop pretending that nothing is wrong, and hiding or minimising her injuries
  • stop believing her children would be disadvantaged if she and they were to leave
  • stop believing that her partner will change
  • start believing that there are other options.

Turning points

Often something happens to tip the scales in favour of taking action. This may be triggered by a specific event or just an accumulation of experiences.

Common reasons given for reaching a turning point include:85

  • protecting others (eg children) from the abuse and the abuser. It may be that the perpetrator has started to hit the children. Many women in abusive home situations tolerate the violence ‘for the sake of the children’, but when they too are subjected to it, this can be the catalyst for change
  • increased severity or humiliation with abuse. The abuse may have escalated to a ‘new’ level. It may be that the first incidence of physical abuse has occurred or a more serious episode of physical abuse has occurred causing injury, or a serious threat has been made which leads to a change in the woman’s sense of her and her family’s personal safety if she does nothing
  • increased awareness of options and access to support and resources
  • fatigue or recognition that the abuser is not going to change
  • partner betrayal or infidelity.

Common ‘change talk’ statements when a women has reached a turning point may relate to desire to change (I would like to …), ability (I can ..., I might be able to ...), reasons (I would probably feel better if I ..., I’ve had enough), need (I ought to, I really should …) commitment (I am going to, something has got to change) and taking steps (this week I started to …).

It is important that the GP is aware of local and other resources the patient may have within their own social network and family. It is good to clarify:

  • What is it that the patient wants to do? Is this realistic and possible? The patient may need to explore alternative options.
  • How does she intend to go about it? Assess current level of risk and discuss a safety plan.
  • What role does she want you to play? Consider the legal issues – for example, documenting injury and impact and referrals to intimate partner abuse counselling and services).

The GP has a role when the patient has decided to act and taken some initial steps. Non-directive problem-solving techniques can help at this time (refer to Tool 5. Non-directive problem-solving/goal-setting tool).

Understanding and discussing her plan is helpful. Actions may include:

  • talking to family and friends
  • changing the locks on the house
  • going to see a counsellor
  • talking to someone at a refuge or shelter
  • leaving the relationship
  • taking out an intervention order
  • reporting the abuse to the police.

Maintaining change is often extremely difficult. Most of the time it does not become apparent what change actually means until it has been achieved. For example, if a woman leaves and finds it emotionally more difficult to be on her own than to deal with violence, she is likely to return. If through leaving she has been denied access to her children, she may also feel compelled to return.

Providing ongoing support and assistance is vital.

There are many reasons why people return to violent situations, but enjoyment of the violence is not one of them. It may be that several attempts to leave are made before long-term success is achieved. While it may seem that the patient is making an unwise choice, it is more productive to get a better understanding of why the patient chooses to stay. There may be very compelling reasons why the victim believes they cannot leave. Making judgements about the merit of the decision is rarely useful and may alienate the victim. It is useful for GPs to understand the circumstances why this has occurred and what the woman wants.

What happens to women after they leave?

Some women receive help from family and friends. Women’s shelters or refuges are available, although this support may be limited depending on location and whether a bed is available. In the situation of a patient leaving her partner, it may be at this point that you lose contact with the patient. The patient may move to safety at a friend or relative’s home, a refuge or out of the area, and there may be extremely good reasons why a survivor needs to sever links with her GP.

Problems experienced by women once they leave an abusive partnership include:

  • risk of further abuse
  • financial – many women experience a dramatic fall in living standard – for example, they have to claim the Supporting Parent’s Benefit
  • loneliness – the need for companionship and a sense of belonging is important to most women
  • the need to rebuild their lives and those of their children.

Many women re-partner, but the longer a woman stays in an abusive relationship, the harder it becomes to leave and re-establish a normal life. Some women carry the scars of physical, sexual and emotional abuse into the future. Anecdotally, around 50% of women who leave a relationship will return to that relationship at some point. Some may enter another abusive relationship. Few will recover totally from the experience.

Many women do not follow through with GP referrals. There are some things you can do to make it more likely that a woman seeks the help you have recommended. If she accepts a referral, here are some things you can do to make it easier for her:

  • Offer to call to make an appointment for her if this would be of help – for example, if she doesn’t have a phone or a safe place to make a call.
  • Provide her with the written information she needs – time, location, how to get there, name of the person she will see.
  • Tell her about the service and what she can expect from it.

If she expresses problems with going to a referral for any reason, help her to make a decision using non-directive problem-solving techniques. Barriers may include childcare, transport, fear that the partner may find out. Always check to see if she has questions or concerns, and to be sure she has understood.

If GPs want to undertake supportive counselling, there are specific techniques that are helpful, including MI and non-directive problem solving. Not all GPs will feel comfortable providing this. Active listening is a simple supportive intervention in itself. Warm referrals to other professionals can also assist women on a pathway to safety, healing and recovery.

Case study: Mary

Mary is a professionally employed woman in her late 40s who experienced significant intimate partner abuse during her (now-ended) 23-year marriage. Before leaving her abusive partner, the violence escalated and she reached a crisis where her physical safety was seriously threatened. She identified a turning point when she recognised her domestic situation was abusive.

A turning point for me in my journey out of my abusive marriage was gaining access to domestic violence literature. I remember sitting with a small publication in my hands and reading through a list of different types of abuse: emotional, psychological, social, financial, physical, and a list of common behaviours in these categories. I was in a state of shock because I could tick most of the categories and behaviours on the list as ‘my life’. The book also discussed the ‘cycle of violence’ and I could identify closely with the patterns it described. I had always considered myself an intelligent, well educated person but the ‘cycle of violence’ occurring in my life had created so much confusion that I was unable to put it all together and understand that this was systematic cyclic abuse being used to control me and that living with the stress was making me increasingly physically sick. I could not deny it to myself any longer.

Mary confiding in her GP and friends and their ongoing support was pivotal in changing her internal dialogue, providing the reality check she needed to confront the pattern of violence and become more confident and decisive about changing her circumstances.

It took a long, long time for me to give up the hope, the dream that things were going to change. I had adopted a strategy of forgetting abusive events as quickly as possible as a means of coping and surviving. It often came as an enormous shock when my GP or friends reminded me of an event or how I had felt at the time because I was editing my consciousness, trying desperately to dwell on the good things and kindnesses that always followed the abusive episodes that left me incredibly emotionally vulnerable and usually quite unwell physically.

During a particularly bad period in my marriage, my GP suggested that I see a psychiatrist. This was helpful because he affirmed that it was my domestic situation that was making me ill and that it was my husband who needed therapy. This was very empowering for me to hear. The medication [given to me by the psychiatrist] helped to stabilise my mood, and my personal strength and ability to think more clearly began to grow. My husband had repeatedly refused to seek any counselling or therapy during the 23 years we were together.

Later on, I confided in one of my university lecturers that my home situation was affecting me very badly and I was having problems coping with my course. She suggested I speak to a professional and referred me to a therapist she knew. The therapist worked intensively with me with a focus on the future. She helped me to explore ways that I could make changes and gain some control over my life. She helped me to set goals and identify tasks that needed to be done. She recommended a change in medication and encouraged me to open my own bank account and make extra keys and arrange somewhere I could go in an emergency. I suppose this is when I finally decided I would leave because I now believed I had the strength and support to do it.

Following the first incident of serious physical violence I saw my GP who documented my injuries and counselled me at length. She, better than anyone, knew my history and she was as frightened for me as I was for myself and told me that I must leave him now – she had never articulated her fears for me so strongly before. We discussed my options and explored my available supports and I left the appointment feeling completely numb and paralysed. However, I was now determined to leave and my thoughts were preoccupied with putting as much in place as possible in the 2 months leading up to the night the death threats occurred.

I can’t even remember what the trigger was on that Saturday night but he was very drunk and he had just lost the job he had recently started. I sat frozen with fear on my bed for hours while he screamed at me that he wanted to kill us both. I could not get out of the house but I managed to lock myself in a bedroom and waited till he left the house the next day before leaving the room. That day I went to see my mother to see if I could stay with her for a while but she was frightened. I went home and locked myself in my room again overnight. On Monday I went to work and spoke to a friend who is a GP and academic and he listened and counselled me at length. He advised me to contact the police to seek assistance, however, I was told there was nothing they could do while I was living in my home with my husband. I never went home again. I had nothing with me except my handbag and the clothes I was wearing.

In the first few weeks after leaving I was very ill, both physically and emotionally. The sense of loss and grief for the life I had known for the past 23 years was immense; my home, my garden, my pets and everything I had created was in that house. I could barely function, bursting into tears constantly night and day – I just couldn’t control it. I was extremely anxious. I couldn’t eat … I couldn’t sleep without drinking alcohol. I felt like there was an electric current vibrating through my whole body and I just wanted it all to stop. I found myself thinking that if I could get home again, this violent emotional upheaval and the painful physical symptoms would go away. This is not what I wanted, or how I wanted my life to go. It was the most awful, distressing time of my life. I felt like I would have accepted comfort from almost anywhere. I was incredibly vulnerable and frightened that my husband would follow through with his threats to suicide. I was terrified for my own personal safety and was very concerned that I was putting my mother’s safety at risk by staying with her.

This time I did not go back even though I considered it many times … I knew I would not survive if I did and the many small steps I had made towards independence with the help of a number of people, including my GP, meant that I now had the strength, health and support to leave.

Mary’s story: 7 years on

It is now 7 years since I left my abusive marriage. A couple of months after I left and had resettled into a new home, my husband broke into my house and attacked me. I honestly thought I was going to die that night. A friend arrived shortly after he had left and saw I was injured and badly shaken and insisted we call the police. They arrived quickly and this time they responded very differently because we were no longer living together. I laid charges against my husband and arranged a restraining order. While I had some sense of support from the police, I certainly did not feel safe as he had again threatened to kill us both. The following 6 months was the loneliest time in my life, being in that empty house alone and terrified he would come back again. Friends and family didn’t feel safe to visit me. I started to drink alcohol to cope and to numb my feelings. I drank too much for quite a long time. Friends and family became aware that I was drinking too much too regularly and confronted me about it and I did see a psychologist a few times. I just didn’t care that much about myself at the time to take health warnings seriously. I was so desperately upset and anxious most of the time. I felt awful so I self-medicated with alcohol. It was really my secret life. I never drank when I went out or when I was with company. But once I was inside my front door I would pour myself a glass of wine and often I couldn’t stop until I fell into bed after cleaning the house for hours almost obsessively.

I left my marriage and survived, but while the high risk period just after leaving is far behind me, I have ongoing health and psychological problems to this day. Recurring traumatic nightmares have been a persistent problem for me. It is not unusual for me to wake up screaming and incredibly distressed two to three times a week. I am acutely sensitive to aggression even on TV. Just witnessing aggression will trigger a traumatic nightmare. I have had persistent sleep problems also. I frequently wake up at night and cannot get back to sleep. Work and financial pressures can trigger episodes of anxiety that I feel totally incapable of getting under control. These episodes can last for weeks at a time when I live with an internal tremor, a fluttering feeling in my chest and pounding in my temples and enormous tension despite being on antidepressant medication. During such episodes my blood pressure rises considerably, I feel very very unwell, cannot sleep and my work and relationships suffer. I just start to hide and avoid anything that further exacerbates the tension and anxiety. I have had three serious episodes of ulcerative colitis over the past 7 years.

The impact on my professional life has been considerable, due to my health and sleep problems. I have needed to take quite a lot of sick leave at times.

Unfortunately my GP stopped practising a couple of years after my marriage ended, so for a long time I did not have a GP at all and did not see a doctor. I couldn’t face the prospect of starting over with a new GP and having to tell my story and make someone else understand the background to my health problems. I think it would have made a huge difference if I had had the ongoing support and care of my GP over the past 7 years.

I have recently found a new GP who has helped me to understand that I have a type of PTSD that needs to be treated and managed with medication and therapy. It was a relief really to have someone identify it as PTSD and start to explore options for treatment with me. I am beginning to gain more of a sense of control, that things are not so hopeless, and that in time I will not feel so exhausted and overwhelmed. I have been somewhat immobilised by the tiredness. I felt I couldn’t plan for the future because I just didn’t have any energy. I really can’t say I have been happy or that I have enjoyed life for a very long time. All I have been able to manage is to keep putting one foot in front of the other to keep life together.

My advice to anyone going through post separation after living in an abusive domestic environment is to maintain those precious relationships that will be your lifeline – including your GP. Keep regular contact with your doctor so you get the support you need to manage the inevitable health issues you will more than likely experience. I feel incredibly fortunate to have had the support of my mother and a wonderful group of female friends and some special work colleagues who have stood by me but looking back, I should have sought out more professional help along the way. It could possibly have reduced the health impacts of intimate partner abuse a great deal for me.

Looking back now I realise what a pivotal role my GP had in my journey out of my abusive marriage. One of the most powerful techniques she used with me was reminding me of why I had come to see her the last time and asking how things had gone over the following week or two. It forced me to remember and face the considerable distress and effect on my health being caused by my husband and to relate it to the current situation and state of my mental and physical health.

I also think that is it was really helpful to imagine that someone else, someone I love, was experiencing the same treatment that I was and to be asked how I would feel about that. I seemed to have a far greater ability to put behaviour into acceptable versus non acceptable categories when it was associated with someone else. Perhaps my GP’s greatest gift to me apart from managing my health problems was helping me to achieve coherence with regard to my current situation and a possible alternative future. I know she was instrumental in saving my life and I cannot emphasise enough the importance of the role she played.

Resources

Please refer to Appendix 7 for resources nationally and in your area.

Further information

When she talks to you about the violence – a tool kit for GPs on domestic violence that was developed in NSW.

Supporting patients experiencing family violence – resource from Australian Medical Association (AMA).

When she talks to you about the violence – video resource developed by AMA NSW.

  1. Rivas C, Ramsay J, Sadowski L, et al. Advocacy interventions to reduce or eliminate violence and promote the physical and psychoso-cial well-being of women who experience intimate partner abuse. Cochrane Review. The Cochrane Library, 2014.
  2. Taft A, O’Doherty L, Hegarty K, et al. Screening women for intimate partner violence in healthcare settings. Cochrane Review. The Cochrane Library, 2013.
  3. World Health Organization. Responding to intimate partner violence and sexual violence against women: WHO clinical and policy guidelines. Geneva: WHO, 2013.
  4. Taft AJ, Hegarty KL, Feder GS. Tackling partner violence in families. Med J Aust 2006;185:535–6.
  5. Hegarty KL, O’Doherty LJ, Taft AJ, et al. Effect of screening and brief counselling for abused women on quality of life, safety planning and mental health: A primary care cluster randomised controlled trial (weave). Lancet 2013;382:249–58.
  6. Feder GS, Hutson M, Ramsay J, et al. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:22–37.
  7. MacMillan HL, Wathen CN, Barlow J, et al. Interventions to prevent child maltreatment and associated impairment. Lancet 2009;373:250–66.
  8. National Health and Medical Research Council. NHMRC additional levels of evidence and grades for recommendations for developers of guidelines. Canberra: NHMRC, 2009.
  9. Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, et al. The world report on violence and health. Lancet 2002;360:1083–8.
  10. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Personal Safety. Canberra: ABS, 2012.
  11. World Health Organization. A global response to elder abuse and neglect: building primary health care capacity to deal with the problem worldwide: main report. Geneva: WHO, 2008.
  12. Taft A, Hegarty K, Flood M. Are men and women equally violent to intimate partners? Aust NZ J Public Health 2001;25:498–500.
  13. Krug EG, Dahlberg LL, Mercy JA, et al, editors. World report on violence and health. Geneva: WHO, 2002.
  14. Reilly JM, Gravdal JA. An ecological model for family violence prevention across the life cycle. Fam Med 2012;44:332–5.
  15. Heise LL. Violence against women: an integrated, ecological framework. Violence Against Women 1998;4:262–90.
  16. Victorian Health Promotion Foundation. National Survey on Community Attitudes to Violence Against Women 2009. Changing cultures, changing attitudes – preventing violence against women. A summary of findings. Carlton: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation, 2009.
  17. Mouzos J, Makkai T. Women’s experience of male violence: Findings from the Australian component of the International Violence Against Women survey. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 2004.
  18. O’Donnell C, Smith A, Madison J. Using demographic risk factors to explain variations in the incidence of violence against women. J Interpers Violence 2002;17:1239–62.
  19. Kitzmann KM, Gaylord NK, Holt AR, et al. Child witnesses to domestic violence: a meta-analytic review. J Consult Clin Psychol 2003;71:339–52.
  20. Newman L. The last frontier: Practice guidelines for the treatment of complex and trauma informed care and service delivery: ASCA, 2012.
  21. Felitti VJ, Anda RF. The relationship of adverse childhood experiences to adult medical disease, psychiatric disorders and sexual be-haviour: Implications for healthcare. In: Lanius RA, Vermetten E, Pain C, editors. The Impact of Early Life Trauma on Health and Dis-ease. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2010. p. 77–87.
  22. Hegarty K. What is intimate partner abuse and how common is it? In: Roberts G, Hegarty K, Feder G, editors. Intimate partner abuse and health professionals: new approaches to domestic violence. London: Elsevier, 2006. p. 19–40.
  23. Vos T, Astbury J, Piers L, et al. Measuring the impact of intimate partner violence on the health of women in Victoria, Australia. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2006;84:739–44.
  24. Bedi G, Goddard C. Intimate partner violence: what are the impacts on children? Aust Psychol 2007;42:66–77.
  25. Feder G, Ramsay J, Dunne D, et al. How far does screening women for domestic (partner) violence in different healthcare settings meet criteria for a screening programme? Systematic reviews of nine UK National Screening Committee criteria. Health Technology As-sessment 2009;13:iii–iv, xi–xiii, 1–113, 37–347.
  26. Tan E, O’Doherty L, Hegarty K. GPs’ communication skills: a study into women’s comfort to disclose intimate partner violence. Aust Fam Physician 2012;41:513–7.
  27. Hegarty K, Taft A. Overcoming the barriers to disclosure and inquiry of partner abuse for women attending general practice. Aust NZ J Public Health 2001;25:433–7.
  28. Hegarty K, Gunn J, Chondros P, et al. Physical and social predictors of partner abuse in women attending general practice: a cross-sectional survey. Br J Gen Pract 2008;58:484–7.
  29. VicHealth. Preventing violence before it occurs: A framework and background paper to guide the primary prevention of violence against women in Victoria. Melbourne: VicHealth, 2007.
  30. World Health Organisation. Global and regional estimates of violence against women: Prevalence and health effects of intimate partner violence and non-partner sexual violence. Geneva: WHO, 2013.
  31. Upston B, Durey R. Everyone’s business: a guide to developing workplace programs for the primary prevention of violence against women. Melbourne: Women’s Health Victoria, 2012.
  32. Powell A. Review of bystander approaches in support of preventing violence against women. Melbourne: Victorian Health Promotion Foundation/VicHealth, 2011.
  33. Bonds DE, Ellis SD, Weeks E, et al. A practice-centered intervention to increase screening for domestic violence in primary care practic-es. BMC Fam Pract 2006;7:63.
  34. Campbell JC. Health consequences of intimate partner violence. Lancet 2002;359:1331–36.
  35. Black MC. Intimate partner violence and adverse health consequences: Implications for clinicians. Am J Lifestyle Med 2011;5:428.
  36. Hegarty K, Gunn J, Chondros P, et al. Association between depression and abuse by partners of women attending general practice: de-scriptive, cross sectional survey. BMJ 2004;328:621–4.
  37. Waalen J, Goodwin MM, Spitz AM, et al. Screening for intimate partner violence by health care providers: barriers and interventions. Am J Prev Med 2000;19:230–7.
  38. Parkinson D. Partner rape and rurality. Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, 2008.
  39. Relf MV, Glass N. Gay and lesbian relationships and intimate partner abuse. In: Roberts G, Hegarty K, Feder G, editors. Intimate partner abuse and health professionals: New approaches to domestic violence. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier; 2006. p. 213–28.
  40. Mouzos J. Femicide: The killing of women in Australia 1989–1998. Research and Public Policy Series. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 1999.
  41. Wallace A. Homicide: The social reality. Sydney: New South Wales Bureau of Crime Statistics and Research, 1986.
  42. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Average Weekly Earnings, Australia, Nov 2013 – 6302.0. Canberra: ABS, 2013.
  43. Feder GS, Hutson M, Ramsay J, et al. Women exposed to intimate partner violence: expectations and experiences when they encounter health care professionals: a meta-analysis of qualitative studies. Arch Intern Med 2006;166:22–37.
  44. Gazmararian J, Lazorick S, Spitz A. Prevalence of violence against pregnant women. JAMA 1996;275:1915–20.
  45. Gazmararian J. Violence and reproductive health: current knowledge and future research directions. Matern Child Health 2000;4:79–84.
  46. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey 2008. Canberra: AGPS, 2010.
  47. Weatherburn D, Snowball L. Is there a cultural explanation for Indigenous violence? A second look at the NATSISS. In: Hunter B, Biddle N, editors. Survey Analysis for Indigenous Policy in Australia: Social Science Perspectives. Canberra: ANU E Press, 2012.
  48. McNair RP. Lesbian health inequalities: a cultural minority issue for health professionals. Med J Aust 2003;178:643–5.
  49. McNair RP, Kavanagh A, Agius P, Tong B. The mental health status of young adult and mid-life non-heterosexual Australian women. Aust N Z J Public Health 2005;29:265–71.
  50. Blosnich JR, Bossarte RM. Comparisons of intimate partner violence among partners in same-sex and opposite-sex relationships in the United States. Am J Public Health 2009;99:2182–4.
  51. Irwin J. (Dis)counted Stories: Domestic Violence and Lesbians. Qualitative Social Work 2008;7:199–215.
  52. McNair R. A guide to sensitive care for lesbian, gay and bisexual people attending General Practice. Melbourne: The University of Mel-bourne, 2012.
  53. McNair RP, Hegarty K. Guidelines for the primary care of lesbian, gay, and bisexual people: a systematic review. Ann Fam Med 2010;8:533–41.
  54. Laing L. Risk Assessment in Domestic Violence: Australian Domestic and Family Violence Clearninghouse, 2004.
  55. Campbell JC. Helping women understand their risk in situations of intimate partner violence. J Interpers Viol 2004;19:1464–77.
  56. Coker AL, Bethea L, Smith PH, et al. Missed opportunities: intimate partner violence in family practice settings. Prev Med 2002;34:445–54.
  57. Campbell JC, Sharps P, Glass N. Risk assessment for intimate partner homicide. In: Pinard GF, Pagani L, editors. Clinical assessment of dangerousness: Empirical contributions. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
  58. Family violence risk assessment and risk management. Department for Victorian Communities, 2007.
  59. Campbell J. Nursing Assessment for Risk of Homicide with Battered Women. Adv Nurs Sci 1986;8:36–51.
  60. Renner LM, Slack KS. Intimate partner violence and child maltreatment: understanding intra- and intergenerational connections. Child Abuse Negl 2006;30:599–617.
  61. Ernst AA, Weiss SJ, Enright-Smith S, et al. Positive outcomes from an immediate and ongoing intervention for child witnesses of intimate partner violence. Am J Emerg Med 2008;26:389–94.
  62. Hardesty J, Campbell JC. Safety planning for abused women and their children. In: Jaffe PG, Baker LL, Cunningham AJ, editors. Protect-ing children from domestic violence: strategies for community intervention. New York: Guilford Press, 2004. p. 89–101.
  63. Ferris L, Norton P, Dunn E, et al. Guidelines for managing domestic abuse when male and female partners are patients of the same phy-sician. JAMA 1997;278:851–7.
  64. Women’s Legal Services NSW. When she talks to you about the violence: A toolkit for GPs in NSW. 2013
  65. Campbell JC, Sharps P, et al. Medical lethality assessment and safety planning in domestic violence cases. Family and Community Vio-lence 2003;5:101–11.
  66. Neighbors C, Walker DD, Roffman RA et al. Self-determination theory and motivational interviewing: Complementary models to elicit voluntary engagement by partner-abusive men. Am J Fam Ther 2008;36:126–36.
  67. Rollnick S, Miller W, Butler C. Motivational interviewing in Health Care. New York: Guilford Press, 2008.
  68. Arkowitz H, Westra HA. Introduction to the special series on motivational interviewing and psychotherapy. J Clin Psychol 2009;65:1149–55.
  69. Miller WR, Rose GS. Toward a theory of motivational interviewing. Am Psychol 2009;64:527–37.
  70. Burke JG, Denison JA, Gielen AC, et al. Ending intimate partner violence: an application of the transtheoretical model. Am J Health Behav 2004;28:122–33.
  71. Chang JC, Cluss PA, Ranieri L, et al. Health care interventions for intimate partner violence: what women want. Womens Health Issues 2005;15:21–30.
  72. Chang JC, Dado D, Ashton S, et al. Understanding behavior change for women experiencing intimate partner violence: mapping the ups and downs using the stages of change. Patient Educ Couns 2006;62:330–9.
  73. Frasier PY, Slatt L, Kowlowitz V, et al. Using the stages of change model to counsel victims of intimate partner violence. Patient Educ Couns 2001;43:211–7.
  74. Jewkes R. Intimate partner violence: the end of routine screening. Lancet 2013;382:190–1.
  75. Johnson NL, Johnson DM. Correlates of Readiness to Change in Victims of Intimate Partner Violence. J Aggress Maltreat Trauma 2013;22:127–44.
  76. Kistenmacher BR, Weiss RL. Motivational interviewing as a mechanism for change in men who batter: a randomized controlled trial. Vio-lence Vict 2008;23:558–70.
  77. Schrager JD, Smith LS, Heron SL, et al. Does stage of change predict improved intimate partner violence outcomes following an emer-gency department intervention? Acad Emerg Med. 2013;20:169–77.
  78. Sheehan KA, Thakor S, Stewart DE. Turning points for perpetrators of intimate partner violence. Trauma Violence Abuse 2012;13:30–40.
  79. Zalmanowitz SJ, Babins-Wagner R, Rodger S, et al. The association of readiness to change and motivational interviewing with treatment outcomes in males involved in domestic violence group therapy. J Interpers Violence 2013;28:956–74.
  80. Apodaca TR, Longabaugh R. Mechanisms of change in motivational interviewing: a review and preliminary evaluation of the evidence. Addiction 2009;104:705–15.
  81. Miller WR, Rollnick S. Ten things that motivational interviewing is not. Behav Cogn Psychother 2009;37:129–40.
  82. Burke JG, Mahoney P, Gielen A, et al. Defining appropriate stages of change for intimate partner violence survivors. Violence Vict 2009;24:36–51.
  83. Alexander PC, Tracy A, Radek M, et al. Predicting stages of change in battered women. J Interpers Violence 2009;24:1652–72.
  84. Burkitt KH, Larkin GL. The transtheoretical model in intimate partner violence victimization: stage changes over time. Violence Vict 2008;23:411–31.
  85. Chang JC, Dado D, Hawker L, et al. Understanding turning points in intimate partner violence: factors and circumstances leading women victims toward change. J Womens Health (Larchmt) 2010;19:251–9.
  86. West R. Time for a change: putting the Transtheoretical (Stages of Change) Model to rest. Addiction 2005;100:1036–9.
  87. Hegarty KL, O’Doherty LO, Astbury J, et al. Identifying intimate partner violence when screening for health and lifestyle issues among women attending general practice. Aust J Prim Health 2012;18:327–31.
  88. Ramsay J, Rutterford C, Gregory A, et al. Domestic violence: knowledge, attitudes, and clinical practice of selected UK primary healthcare clinicians. Br J Gen Pract 2012;62:647–55.
  89. Mitchell L. Domestic violence in Australia – an overview of the issues. Canberra: Parliament of Australia, Department of Parliamentary Ser-vices, 2011.
  90. Alston M, Allan J, Dietsch E, et al. Brutal neglect: Australian rural women’s access to health services. Rural Remote Health 2006;6:475.
  91. Sprague S, Madden K, Simunovic N, et al. Barriers to screening for intimate partner violence. Women Health 2012;52:587–605.
  92. Tiwari A, Leung WC, Leung TW, et al. A randomised controlled trial of empowerment training for Chinese abused pregnant women in Hong Kong. BJOG 2005;112:1249–56.
  93. Kiely M, El-Mohandes AA, El-Khorazaty MN, et al. An integrated intervention to reduce intimate partner violence in pregnancy: a random-ized controlled trial. Obstet Gynecol 2010;115:273–83.
  94. Petersen R, Moracco KE, Goldstein KM, et al. Moving beyond disclosure: women’s perspectives on barriers and motivators to seeking assistance for intimate partner violence. Women Health 2004;40:63–76.
  95. Burge SK, Schneider FD, Ivy L. Patients’ advice to physicians about intervening in family conflict. Ann Fam Med 2005;3:248–54.
  96. Katerndahl DA, Burge SK, Ferrer RL, Becho J, Wood R. Complex dynamics in intimate partner violence: a time series study of 16 women. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry 2010;12.
  97. Klevens J, Kee R, Trick W, et al. Effect of screening for partner violence on women’s quality of life: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA 2012;308:681–9.
  98. Musser PH, Murphy CM. Motivational interviewing with perpetrators of intimate partner abuse. J Clin Psychol 2009;65:1218–31.
  99. Tetterton S, Farnsworth E. Older women and intimate partner violence: effective interventions. J Interpers Violence 2011;26:2929–42.
  100. Battaglia TA, Finley E, Liebschutz JM. Survivors of intimate partner violence speak out: trust in the patient-provider relationship. J Gen Intern Med 2003;18:617–23.
  101. Rees S, Silove D, Chey T, et al. Lifetime prevalence of gender-based violence in women and the relationship with mental disorders and psychosocial function. JAMA 2011;306:513–21.
  102. Aldridge ML, Browne KD. Perpetrators of spousal homicide: a review. Trauma Violence Abuse 2003;4:265–76.
  103. Laslett, A-M., Catalano, P., Chikritzhs, Y., Dale, C., Doran, C., Ferris, J., Jainullabudeen, T., Livingston, M, Matthews, S., Mugavin, J., Room, R., Schlotterlein, M. and Wilkinson, C. (2010) The Range and Magnitude of Alcohol’s Harm to Others. Fitzroy, Victoria: AER Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, Turning Point Alcohol and Drug Centre, Eastern Health.
  104. Mintz H, Cornett F. When your patient is a batterer: what you need to know before treating perpetrators of domestic violence. Postgrad Med 1997;101:219–28.
  105. World Health Organization/London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Preventing intimate partner and sexual violence against women: taking action and generating evidence. Geneva: WHO, 2010.
  106. Danielson K, Moffitt T, Caspi A, et al. Comorbidity between abuse of an adult and DSM-III-R mental disorders: evidence from an epidemi-ological study. Am J Psychiatry 1998;155:131–3.
  107. Humphreys C, Regan L, River D, et al. Domestic violence and substance use: tackling complexity. Br J Soc Work 2005;35:1303–20.
  108. Sharps P, Campbell J, Campbell D, et al. The role of alcohol use in intimate partner femicide. Am J Addict 10:122–35.
  109. Thompson M, Kingree J. The roles of victim and perpetrator alcohol use in intimate partner violence outcomes. J Interpers Violence 2006;21:163–77.
  110. Taft A, Shakespeare J. Managing the whole family when women are abused by intimate partners: challenges for health professionals. In: Roberts G, Hegarty K, Feder G, editors. Intimate partner abuse and health professionals: New approaches to domestic violence. London: Churchill Livingstone Elsevier, 2006. p. 145–62.
  111. Gerbert B, Moe J, Caspers N. Physicians’ response to victims of domestic violence: Toward a model of care. Women Health 2002;35:1–22.
  112. Helfritz L, Stanford M, Conklin S, et al. Usefulness of self-report instruments in assessing men accused of domestic violence. Psychol Rec 2006;56:171–80.
  113. Adams D. Guidelines for doctors on identifying and helping their patients who batter. J Am Med Womens Assoc 1996;51:123–6.
  114. Taft A, Broom D, Legge D. General practitioner management of intimate partner abuse and the whole family: qualitative study. BMJ 2004;328:618.
  115. Miller D, Jaye C. GPs’ perception of their role in the identification and management of family violence. Fam Pract 2007;24:95–101.
  116. Featherstone B, Fraser C. Working with fathers around domestic violence: Contemporary debates. Child Abuse Review 2012;21:255–63.
  117. Smedslund G, Dalsbø T, Steiro A, et al. Cognitive behavioural therapy for men who physically abuse their female partner. Cochrane Re-view. The Cochrane Library, 2011.
  118. Urbis. Literature Review on Domestic Violence Perpetrators
  119. Hanson RF, Kievit LW, Saunders BE, et al. Correlates of adolescent reports of sexual assault: Findings from the National Survey of Ado-lescents. Child Maltreatment 2003;8:261–72.
  120. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Child Protection Australia 2011–12. Canberra: Australian Government, 2013.
  121. World Health Organization, International Society for the Prevention of Child Abuse and Neglect. Preventing child maltreatment: a guide to taking action and generating evidence. Geneva: WHO, 2006.
  122. Barlow J, Johnston I, Kendrick D, et al. Individual and group-based parenting programmes for the treatment of physical child abuse and neglect. Cochrane Review. The Cochrane Library, 2008.
  123. Sanders M, Markie-Dadds C, Turner K. Theoretical, scientific and clinical foundations of the Triple P-Positive Parenting Program: A pop-ulation approach to parenting competency. The Parenting and Family Support Centre: University of Queensland, 2003.
  124. Mikton CA. Child maltreatment prevention: a systematic review of reviews. Bulletin of the World Health Organization 2009;87:353–61.
  125. World Health Organization. Child maltreatment and alcohol. Geneva: WHO, 2006.
  126. World Health Organization. Child maltreatment fact sheet 2010
  127. Gilbert R, Widom CS, Browne K, et al. Burden and consequences of child maltreatment in high-income countries. Lancet 2009;373:68–81.
  128. Australian Institute of Family Studies. The economic costs of child abuse and neglect 2013
  129. Taylor P, Moore P, Pezzullo L, et al. The cost of child abuse in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Childhood Foundation and Child Abuse Prevention Research Australia, 2008.
  130. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Child deaths from abuse and neglect 2014
  131. Brown T, Tyson D, Fernandez P. Filicide in Australia. Addressing Filicide: The International Conference; Prato, Italy, 30–31 May 2013.
  132. Dawe S, Harnett P, Frye S. Improving outcomes for children living in families with parental substance misuse: What we know and what we should do. Canberra: Australian Institute of Family Studies, 2008.
  133. Perry BD. Examining child maltreatment through a neurodevelopmental lens: clinical applications of the Neurosequential Model of Therapeutics. J Loss Trauma 2009;14:240–55.
  134. Geeraert L, van den Noortgate W, Grietens H, et al. The effects of early prevention programs for families with young children at risk for physical child abuse and neglect: a meta-analysis. Child Maltreatment 2004;9:277–91.
  135. Zwi K, Woolfenden S, Wheeler D, et al. School-based education programmes for the prevention of child abuse. Cochrane Review. The Cochrane Library, 2009.
  136. Norman R, Munkhtsetseg B, Rumma D, et al. The long-term health consequences of child physical abuse, emotional abuse and neglect: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLos Med 2012;9:e1001349.
  137. Meredith V, Price-Robertson R. Alcohol misuse and child maltreatment. Australian Government, Australian Institute of Family Studies; 2011.
  138. Jensen TK, Gulbrandsen W, Mossige S, et al. Reporting possible sexual abuse: A qualitative study on children’s perspectives and the context for disclosure. Child Abuse Negl 2005;29:1395–413.
  139. Fontes LA, Plummer C. Cultural issues in disclosures of child sexual sbuse. J Child Sex Abus 2010;19:491–518.
  140. Foynes MM, Freyd JJ, DePrince AP. Child abuse: Betrayal and disclosure. Child Abuse Negl 2009;33:209–17.
  141. Macdonald G, Higgins J, Ramchandani P, et al. Cognitive-behavioural interventions for children who have been sexually abused. Cochrane Review. The Cochrane Library, 2012.
  142. Australian Institute of Family Studies. Mandatory reporting of child abuse and neglect. Commonwealth of Australia, 2013.
  143. Gini G. Associations between bullying behaviour, psychosomatic complaints, emotional and behavioural problems. J Paediatr Child Health 2008;44:492–7.
  144. Jones L, Bellis MA, Wood S, et al. Prevalence and risk of violence against children with disabilities: a systematic review and me-ta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet 2012;380:899–907.
  145. Ttofi MM, Farrington DP. Effectiveness of school-based programs to reduce bullying: a systematic and meta-analytic review. J Exp Crim-inol 2011;7:27–56.
  146. Williams LC, Stelko-Pereira AC. Let’s prevent school violence, not just bullying and peer victimization: a commentary on Finkelhor, Turner, and Hamby (2012). Child Abuse Negl 2013;37:235–6.
  147. Finkelhor D, Turner HA, Hamby SL. Bullying vs. school violence: A response to Williams and Stelko-Pereira (2013). Child Abuse Negl 2013;37:608–9.
  148. Ybarra ML, Boyd D, Korchmaros JD, et al. Defining and measuring cyberbullying within the larger context of bullying victimization. J Ad-olesc Health 2012;51:53–8.
  149. Menesini E, Nocentini A, Palladino BE, et al. Cyberbullying definition among adolescents: a comparison across six European countries. Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw 2012;15:455–63.
  150. Slee PT, Spears B, Campbell M, et al. Addressing bullying and cyberbullying in schools: Translating theory into practice. Centre for Stra-tegic Education, 2011.
  151. Fisher S, Sauter A, Slobodniuk L, et al. Sexting in Australia: The Legal and Social Ramifications. Melbourne: Parliament of Victoria Law Reform Committee Sexting Inquiry, 2012.
  152. Walker S, Sanci L, Temple-Smith M. Sexting: Young women’s and men’s views on its nature and origins. J Adolesc Health 2013;52:697–701.
  153. Butler D, Kift S, Campbell M, et al. School policy responses to cyberbullying: An Australian legal perspective. Int J Law Educ 2011;16:7–28.
  154. Finkelhor D, Turner HA, Hamby S. Let’s prevent peer victimization, not just bullying. Child Abuse Negl 2012;36:271–4.
  155. Tucker CJ, Finkelhor D, Turner H, et al. Association of sibling aggression with child and adolescent mental health. Pediatrics 2013;132:79–84.
  156. Skinner JA, Kowalski RM. Profiles of sibling bullying. J Interpers Violence 2013;28:1726–36.
  157. Wolke D, Skew AJ. Bullying among siblings. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2012;24:17–25.
  158. Craig W, Harel-Fisch Y, Fogel-Grinvald H, et al. A cross-national profile of bullying and victimization among adolescents in 40 countries. Int J Public Health 2009;54 Suppl 2:216–24.
  159. Due P, Holstein BE, Soc MS. Bullying victimization among 13 to 15-year-old school children: results from two comparative studies in 66 countries and regions. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2008;20:209–21.
  160. Gan SS, Zhong C, Das S, et al. The prevalence of bullying and cyberbullying in high school: a 2011 survey. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2013 22:1–5.
  161. Hemphill SA, Kotevski A, Tollit M, et al. Longitudinal predictors of cyber and traditional bullying perpetration in Australian secondary school students. Journal Adolesc Health 2012;51:59–65.
  162. Cross D, Shaw T, Hearn L, et al. Australian Covert Bullying Prevalence Study. Child Health Promotion Research Centre, Edith Cowan University, May 2009.
  163. Waseem M, Ryan M, Foster CB, et al. Assessment and management of bullied children in the emergency department. Pediatr Emerg Care 2013 29:389–98.
  164. Undheim AM, Sund AM. Bullying – a hidden factor behind somatic symptoms? Acta Paediatr (Oslo, Norway: 1992) 2011;100:496–8.
  165. Carr-Gregg M, Manocha R. Bullying – effects, prevalence and strategies for detection. Aust Fam Physician 2011;40:98–102.
  166. Daigle L, Beaver K, Turner M. Resiliency against victimization: Results from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent Health. J Crim Justice 2010;38.
  167. Cappadocia MC, Weiss JA, Pepler D. Bullying experiences among children and youth with autism spectrum disorders. J Autism Dev Dis-ord 2012;42:266–77.
  168. Sentenac M, Gavin A, Gabhainn SN, et al. Peer victimization and subjective health among students reporting disability or chronic illness in 11 Western countries. Eur J Public Health 2013;23:421–6.
  169. Mindmatters. Community matters-rural and remote issues. In: Bullying in rural settings. Canberra: Commonwealth Australia, 2010.
  170. Merrell K, Isava M. How effective are school bullying intervention programs? A meta-analysis of intervention research. Sch Psychol Q 2008;23:26–42.
  171. Vreeman RC, Carroll AE. A systematic review of school-based interventions to prevent bullying. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2007;161:78–88.
  172. Karna A, Voeten M, Little TD, et al. A large-scale evaluation of the KiVa antibullying program: grades 4–6. Child Dev 2011;82:311–30.
  173. Salmivalli C, Poskiparta E. Making bullying prevention a priority in Finnish schools: the KiVa antibullying program. New Dir Youth Dev 2012:41–53.
  174. Williford A, Boulton A, Noland B, et al. Effects of the KiVa anti-bullying program on adolescents’ depression, anxiety, and perception of peers. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2012;40:289–300.
  175. Williford A, Elledge LC, Boulton AJ, et al. Effects of the KiVa Antibullying program on cyberbullying and cybervictimization frequency among Finnish youth. J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2013;42:820–33.
  176. Leff SS, Waasdorp TE. Effect of aggression and bullying on children and adolescents: implications for prevention and intervention. Curr Psychiatry Rep 2013;15:343.
  177. Hensley V. Childhood bullying: a review and implications for health care professionals. Nurs Clin North Am 2013;48:203–13.
  178. Copeland WE, Wolke D, Angold A, et al. Adult psychiatric outcomes of bullying and being bullied by peers in childhood and adoles-cence. JAMA psychiatry 2013;70:419–26.
  179. Ortega R, Elipe P, Mora-Merchan JA, et al. The emotional impact of bullying and cyberbullying on victims: a European cross-national study. Aggress Behav 2012;38:342–56.
  180. Ramya SG, Kulkarni ML. Bullying among school children: prevalence and association with common symptoms in childhood. Indian J Pediatr 2011;78:307–10.
  181. Gini G, Pozzoli T. Association between bullying and psychosomatic problems: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics 2009;123:1059–65.
  182. Sansone RA, Sansone LA. Bully victims: psychological and somatic aftermaths. Psychiatry 2008;5:62–4.
  183. Campbell M, Slee PT, Spears B. Do cyberbullies suffer too? Cyberbullies’ perceptions of the harm they cause to others and to their own mental health. International School Psychology 2012;1:1–27.
  184. Campbell M, Spears B, Slee PT, et al. Victims’ perceptions of traditional and cyberbullying, and the psychosocial correlates of their vic-timisation. J Emotional Behavioural Difficulties 2012;17.
  185. Perren S, Dooley J, Shaw T, et al. Bullying in school and cyberspace: Associations with depressive symptoms in Swiss and Australian adolescents. Child Adolesc Psychiatry Ment Health 2010;4.
  186. Shetgiri R, Lin H, Flores G. Trends in risk and protective factors for child bullying perpetration in the United States. Child Psychiatry Hum Dev 2013;44:89–104.
  187. Kowalski RM, Limber SP. Psychological, physical, and academic correlates of cyberbullying and traditional bullying. J Adolesc Health 2013;53:S13–20.
  188. Espelage DL, De La Rue L. School bullying: its nature and ecology. Int J Adolesc Med Health 2012;24:3–10.
  189. Hemphill SA, Kotevski A, Herrenkohl TI, et al. Longitudinal consequences of adolescent bullying perpetration and victimisation: a study of students in Victoria, Australia. Crim Behav Ment Health 2011;21:107–16.
  190. Boynton-Jarrett R, Ryan LM, Berkman LF, et al. Cumulative violence exposure and self-rated health: longitudinal study of adolescents in the United States. Pediatrics 2008;122:961–70.
  191. Fekkes M, Pijpers FI, Fredriks AM, et al. Do bullied children get ill, or do ill children get bullied? A prospective cohort study on the rela-tionship between bullying and health-related symptoms. Pediatrics 2006;117:1568–74.
  192. Allison S, Roeger L, Reinfeld-Kirkman N. Does school bullying affect adult health? Population survey of health-related quality of life and past victimization. Aust N Z J Psychiatry 2009;43:1163–70.
  193. Sourander A, Jensen P, Ronning JA, et al. What is the early adulthood outcome of boys who bully or are bullied in childhood? The Finn-ish ‘From a Boy to a Man’ study. Pediatrics 2007;120:397–404.
  194. Niemela S, Brunstein-Klomek A, Sillanmaki L, et al. Childhood bullying behaviors at age eight and substance use at age 18 among males. A nationwide prospective study. Addict Behav 2011;36:256–60.
  195. Schreier A, Wolke D, Thomas K, et al. Prospective study of peer victimization in childhood and psychotic symptoms in a nonclinical population at age 12 years. Arch Gen Psychiatry 2009;66:527–36.
  196. Ttofi MM, Farrington DP, Losel F, et al. The predictive efficiency of school bullying versus later offending: a systematic/meta-analytic re-view of longitudinal studies. Crim Behav Ment Health 2011;21:80–9.
  197. Falb KL, McCauley HL, Decker MR, et al. School bullying perpetration and other childhood risk factors as predictors of adult intimate partner violence perpetration. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2011;165:890–4.
  198. Turner HA, Finkelhor D, Hamby SL, et al. Specifying type and location of peer victimization in a national sample of children and youth. J Youth Adolesc 2011;40:1052–67.
  199. Sijtsema JJ, Veenstra R, Lindenberg S, et al. Empirical test of bullies’ status goals: assessing direct goals, aggression, and prestige. Ag-gress Behav 2009;35:57–67.
  200. Reijntjes A, Vermande M, Olthof T, et al. Costs and benefits of bullying in the context of the peer group: a three wave longitudinal analy-sis. J Abnorm Child Psychol 2013;41:1217–29.
  201. Kulig JC, Hall BL, Kalischuk RG. Bullying perspectives among rural youth: a mixed methods approach. Rural Remote Health 2008;8:923.
  202. Karna A, Voeten M, Little TD, et al. Going to scale: a nonrandomized nationwide trial of the KiVa antibullying program for grades 1-9. J Consult Clinical Psychol 2011;79:796–805.
  203. Pepler D, Jiang D, Craig W, et al. Developmental trajectories of bullying and associated factors. Child Dev 2008;79:325–38.
  204. Wolke D, Samara MM. Bullied by siblings: association with peer victimisation and behaviour problems in Israeli lower secondary school children. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2004;45:1015–29.
  205. Holt KE, Kantor, Finkelhor D. Parent/child concordance about bullying involvement and family characteristics related to bullying and peer victimization. J School Violence 2008;8:42–63.
  206. Lamb J, Pepler DJ, Craig W. Approach to bullying and victimization. Can Family Physician 2009;55:356–60.
  207. Lyznicki JM, McCaffree MA, Robinowitz CB. Childhood bullying: implications for physicians. Am Fam Physician 2004;70:1723–8.
  208. Dawkins J. Bullying in schools: doctors’ responsibilities. BMJ 1995;310:274–5.
  209. Slee PT, Mohyla J. The PEACE Pack: an evaluation to reduce bullying in four Australian primary schools. Educational Research 2007;49:103–14.
  210. Committee on Injury V, and Poison Prevention. Policy statement – Role of the pediatrician in youth violence prevention. Pediatrics 2009;124:393–402.
  211. Usherwood T. Understanding the consultation. Open University Press, 999.
  212. Lee A, Coles J, Lee SJ, et al. Women survivors of child abuse – don’t ask, don’t tell. Aust Fam Physician 2012;41:903–6.
  213. Ogloff JR, Cutajar MC, Mann E, et al. Child sexual abuse and subsequent offending and victimisation: A 45 year follow-up study. Trends and issues in crime and criminal justice no.440. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, June 2012.
  214. De Visser RO, Smith AMA, Rissel CE, et al. Experiences of sexual coercion among a representation sample of adults. Aust N Z J Public Health 2003;27:198–203.
  215. Hayatbakhsh MR, Najman JM, Jamrozik K, et al. Childhood sexual abuse and cannabis use in early adulthood: Findings from an Austral-ian birth cohort study. Arch Sex Behav 2009;38:135–42.
  216. Higgins DJ, McCabe MP. Multiple forms of child abuse and neglect: Adult retrospective reports. Aggress Violent Behav 2001;6:547–78.
  217. Indermaur D. Young Australians and domestic violence. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 2001.
  218. Mamun AA, Lawlor DA, O’Callaghan MJ, et al. Does childhood sexual abuse predict young adult’s BMI? A birth cohort study. Obesity 2007;15:2103–10.
  219. Mazza D, Dennerstein L, Garamszegi CV, et al. The physical, sexual and emotional violence history of middle-aged women: A communi-ty-based prevalence study. Med J Aust 2001;175:199–201.
  220. Moore E, Romaniuk H, Olsson C, et al. The prevalence of childhood sexual abuse and adolescent unwanted sexual contact among boys and girls living in Victoria, Australia. Child Abuse Negl 2010;23:379–85.
  221. Mouzos J, Makkai T. Women’s experiences of male violence: Findings from the Australian component of the International Violence Against Women Survey (IVAWS). Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 2004.
  222. Najman JM, Dunne MP, Purdie DM, et al. Sexual abuse in childhood and sexual dysfunction in adulthood: An Australian population-based study. Arch Sex Behav 2005;34:517–26.
  223. Price-Robertson R, Smart D, Bromfield L. Family is for life: How childhood experiences within the family help or hinder the lives of young adults. Fam Matters 2010;85:7–17.
  224. Rosenman S, Rodgers B. Childhood adversity in an Australian population. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2004;39:695–702.
  225. Adults Surviving Child Abuse (ASCA). ASCA 1300 Professional Support Line Research, October 2013.
  226. Chartier MJ, Walker JR, Naimark B. Childhood abuse, adult health, and health care utilization: results from a representative community sample. Am J Epidemiol 2007;165:1031–8.
  227. Cutajar MC, Mullen PE, Ogloff JRP, et al. Psychopathology in a large cohort of sexually abused children followed up to 43 years. Child Abuse Negl 2010;34:813–22.
  228. Scott JG, Cohen D, DiCicco-Bloom B, et al. Understanding healing relationships in primary care. Ann Fam Med 2008;6:315–22.
  229. Holden T. ‘It’s still not my shame’ Adult survivors of childhood sexual abuse report, May 2002.
  230. Kezelman C, Stavropoulos P. The Last Frontier: Practice Guidelines for Treatment of Complex Trauma and Trauma Informed Care and Service Delivery. Sydney: Adults Surviving Child Abuse, 2012.
  231. Australian Institute of Criminology. Australian Crimes: Facts and figures. Canberra: Australian Institute of Criminology, 2013.
  232. Jozkowski KN, Sanders SA. Health and sexual outcomes of women who have experienced forced or coercive sex. Women Health 2012;52:101–18.
  233. Miller TR, Cohen MA, Wiersema B. Victim costs and consequences: A new look – National Institute of Justice Research Report. Maryland: US Department of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, 1996.
  234. Samuels JE, Thacker SB. Full Report of the Prevalence, Incidence, and Consequences of Violence Against Women. Findings From the National Violence Against Women Survey: National Institute of Justice, US Department of Justice. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2000.
  235. Hurley M, Parker H, Wells DL. The epidemiology of drug facilitated sexual assault. J Clin Forensic Med 2006;13:181–5.
  236. Tucker JS, Wenzel SL, Straus JB, Ryan GW, Golinelli D. Experiencing interpersonal violence: perspectives of sexually active, sub-stance-using women living in shelters and low-income housing. Violence Against Women 2005;11:1319–40.
  237. Murray S, Powell A. Sexual assault and adults with a disability. Enabling recognition, disclosure and a just response. Melbourne: Austral-ian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, 2008.
  238. VanZile-Tamsen C, Testa M, Livingston JA. The impact of sexual assault history and relationship context on appraisal of and responses to acquaintance sexual assault risk. J Interpers Violence 2005;20:813–32.
  239. Loh C, Gidycz CA. A prospective analysis of the relationship between childhood sexual victimization and perpetration of dating violence and sexual assault in adulthood. J Interpers Violence 2006;21:732–49.
  240. Morrison Z. Homelessness and sexual assault. Melbourne: Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, 2009.
  241. Quadara A. Sex workers and sexual assault in Australia. Melbourne: Australian Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, 2008.
  242. Tarczon C, Quadara A. The nature and extent of sexual assault and abuse in Australia. Melbourne: Australia Centre for the Study of Sexual Assault, 2012.
  243. Amowitz LL, Reis C, Lyons KH, et al. Prevalence of war-related sexual violence and other human rights abuses among internally dis-placed persons in Sierra Leone. JAMA 2002;287:513–21.
  244. Burgess AW, Holmstrom LL. Rape trauma syndrome. Am J Psychiatry 1974;131:981–6.
  245. Green AH. Child sexual abuse: immediate and long-term effects and intervention. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 1993;32:890–902.
  246. World Health Organization. Guidelines for medico-legal care of sexual violence survivors. Geneva: WHO, 2003.
  247. Mein JK, Palmer CM, Shand MC, et al. Management of acute adult sexual assault. Med J Aust 2003;178:226–30.
  248. Post L, Page C, Conner T, Prokhorov A, Fang Y, Biroscak BJ. Elder abuse in long-term care: types, patterns, and risk factors. Res Aging 2010;32:323–48.
  249. Johannesen M, LoGiudice D. Elder abuse: a systematic review of risk factors in community-dwelling elders. Age Ageing 2013;42:292–8.
  250. Australian Medical Association. AMA Position Statement on Care of Older People 1998 – amended 2000 and 2011, 2011.
  251. Glasgow K, Fanslow J. Family Violence Intervention Guidelines: Elder abuse and neglect. Wellington: Ministry of Health, 2006.
  252. World Health Organization. Elder maltreatment fact sheet. Geneva: WHO, 2011.
  253. Schofield MJ, Powers JR, Loxton D. Mortality and disability outcomes of self-reported elder abuse: a 12-year prospective investigation. J Am Geriatr Soc 2013;61:679–85.
  254. Kurrle S, Naughtin G. An overview of elder abuse and neglect in Australia. J Elder Abuse Negl 2008;20:108–25.
  255. Kurrle SE, Sadler PM, Cameron ID. Elder abuse – an Australian case series. Med J Aust 1991;155:150–3.
  256. Kurrle SE, Sadler PM, Lockwood K, Cameron I. Elder abuse: prevalence, intervention and outcomes in patients referred to four aged care assessment teams. Med J Aust 1997;166:119.
  257. Livermore P, Bunt R, Biscan K. Elder Abuse among Clients and Carers Referred to the Central Coast ACAT: a Descriptive Analysis. Aus-tralas J Ageing 2001;20:41–7.
  258. Acierno R, Hernandez MA, Amstadter AB, et al. Prevalence and correlates of emotional, physical, sexual, and financial abuse and poten-tial neglect in the United States: the National Elder Mistreatment Study. Am J Public Health 2010;100:292–7.
  259. National Centre on Elder Abuse. Fact Sheet: Elder Abuse Prevalence and Incidence. Washington: National Centre on Elder Abuse, 2005.
  260. Elder Abuse Prevention Project. Strengthening Victoria’s Response to Elder Abuse. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria, Department for Victorian Communities, 2005.
  261. The Senate Committee of Inquiry. Quality and equity in aged care report. Canberra: Commonwealth Government of Australia, 2005.
  262. Yaffe MJ, Tazkarji B. Understanding elder abuse in family practice. Can Fam Physician 2012;58:1336–40.
  263. Cupitt M. Identifying and addressing the issues of elder abuse: a rural perspective. J Elder Abuse Negl 1997;8:21–30.
  264. Eastgate G, van Deil M, Lennox N, Scheermeyer E. Women with intellectual disabilities – study of sexuality, sexual abuse and protection skills. Aust Fam Physician 2011;40:226–30.
  265. Eastgate G, Scheermeyer E, van Driel M, Lennox M. Intellectual disability, sexuality and sexual abuse prevention – a study of family mem-bers and support workers. Aust Fam Physician 2012;41:135–9.
  266. Hughes K, Bellis MA, Jones L, et al. Prevalence and risk of violence against adults with disabilities: a systematic review and me-ta-analysis of observational studies. Lancet 2012;379:1621–9.
  267. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Disability, ageing and carers. Australia: summary of findings 2009. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2011.
  268. Intellectual Disability Rights Service. Legal Advice, 2014
  269. Jenkins R, Davies R. Neglect of people with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil 2006;10:35–45.
  270. Khemka I, Hickson L, Reynolds G. Evaluation of a decision-making curriculum to empower women with mental retardation to resist abuse. Am J Ment Retard 2005;105:193–204.
  271. Barger E, Wacker J, Macy R, Parish S. Sexual assault prevention for women with intellectual disabilities: a critical review of the evidence. Intellect Dev Disabil 2009;47:249–62.
  272. Johnson K, Frawley P, Hillier L, et al. Living Safer Sexual Lives: Research and Action. Tizard Learning Disability Review 2002;7.
  273. National Disability Insurance Scheme Launch Transition Agency (National Disability Insurance Agency). National Disability Insurance Scheme
  274. Gordon S, Hallahan K, Henry D. Putting the picture together: Inquiry into response by government agencies to complaints of family vio-lence and child abuse in Aboriginal communities. Perth: State Law Publisher, 2002.
  275. Mow KE. Tjunparni: Family violence in Indigenous Australia. Canberra: ATSIC, 1992.
  276. Mullighan EP. Children on Anangu Pitjantjatjara Yankunytjatjara (APY) Lands Commission of Inquiry. A report into sexual abuse. Adelaide: South Australian Government, 2008.
  277. NSW Aboriginal Child Sexual Assault Taskforce. Breaking the silence: Creating the future. Addressing child sexual assault in Aboriginal communities in NSW. Sydney: NSW Government, 2006.
  278. Robertson B. The Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Women’s Taskforce on Violence Report. Brisbane: Queensland Government, 1999.
  279. Victorian Indigenous Family Violence Task Force. Victorian Indigenous Family Violence Task Force Final Report. Melbourne: Depart-ment of Victorian Communities, 2003.
  280. Wild R, Anderson P. Ampe Akelyernemane Meke Mekarle: Little Children are Sacred. Report of the Northern Territory Government Inquiry into the Protection of Aboriginal Children from Sexual Abuse. Darwin: Department of the Chief Minister, 2007.
  281. Victorian Government Department of Justice. Measuring Family Violence in Victoria – Victorian Family Violence Database: Seven Year Trend Analysis 1999–2006. Melbourne: Department of Justice, 2008.
  282. Berrios D, Grady D. Domestic violence: risk factors and outcomes. West J Med 1991;155:133–6.
  283. Campbell J, Lewandowski L. Mental and Physical Health Effects of Intimate Partner Violence on Women and Children. Psychiatr Clin North Am 1997;20:353–74.
  284. Langton M. The end of big men politics. Griffith Review 2008;22:13–38.
  285. Cripps K, Adams M. Family Violence: Pathways Forward. In: Dudgeon P, Milroy H, Walker R, editors. Working Together: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Mental Health and Wellbeing Principles and Practice. Canberra: Commonwealth of Australia, 2014:399–416.
  286. Australian Human Rights Commission. Social Justice Report 2011. Sydney: Australian Human Rights Commission, 2011.
  287. Cripps K. Enough family fighting: Indigenous community responses to addressing family violence in Australia and the United States. Melbourne: Monash University, 2004.
  288. Dibble U, Straus M. Some social structure determinants of inconsistency between attitudes and behaviour: The case of family violence. J Marriage Fam 1980;42:71–80.
  289. Gill C, Theriault L. Connecting social determinants of health and woman abuse: A discussion paper. Charlottetown: University of Prince Edward Island, 2005.
  290. Malcoe L, Duran B. Intimate partner violence and injury in the lives of low-income Native American women. In: Fisher B, editor. Develop-ments in research practice and policy: Violence against women and family violence. Washington: US Department of Justice, 2004.
  291. Malcoe L, Duran B, Montgomery J. Socioeconomic disparities in intimate partner violence against Native American women: A cross-sectional study. BMC Medicine 2004;2.
  292. Oetzel JG, Duran B. Intimate partner violence in American Indian and/or Alaska Native communities: A social ecological framework of de-terminants and interventions. The American Indian and Alaska Native Mental Health Research: A Journal of the National Center. 2004;11:49–68.
  293. Raphael J, Tolman R. Trapped by poverty/trapped by abuse: New evidence documenting the relationship between domestic violence and welfare. Chicago: Taylor Institute and the University of Michigan Research Development Center on Poverty, Risk and Mental Health, 1997.
  294. Cripps K, Bennett C, Gurrin L, Studdert D. Victims of violence among Indigenous mothers with dependent children. Med J Aust 2009;191:481–5.
  295. Day A, Howells K, Nakata M, et al. The development of culturally appropriate anger management programs for Indigenous people in Aus-tralian prison settings. Int J Offender Rehab Comp Criminol 2006;50:520–39.
  296. White M. Pathways to a good life well lived: Community-owned recovery plan for overcoming suicidal despair in the Fitzroy Valley. Fitz-roy Crossing: Marninwarntikura Fitzroy Women’s Resource and Legal Centre, Marra Worra Worra Aboriginal Corporation, Nindilingarri Cultural Health and Kimberley Aboriginal Law and Cultural Centre, 2011.
  297. Raj A, Silverman JG, McCleary-Sills J, Liu R. Immigration policies increase south Asian immigrant women’s vulnerability to intimate part-ner violence. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2005;60:26–32.
  298. Baba Y, Murray SB. Spousal abuse: Vietnamese reports of parental violence. J Sociol Soc Welf 2003;30:97.
  299. Khosla AH, Dua D, Devi L, Sud SS. Domestic violence in pregnancy in North Indian women. Indian J Med Sci 2005;59:195–9.
  300. The Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture Inc. Caring for Refugee patients in General Practice: A Desktop Guide. 4th edn. The Victorian Foundation for Survivors of Torture Inc, 2012.
  301. Echevarria A, Johar A. Beyond bitter moments: Non-English speaking women’s access to support services for survivors of domestic vio-lence. Fairfield West: Ettinger House, 1987.
  302. Australian Bureau of Statistics. 2071.0 – Reflecting a Nation: Stories from the 2011 census, 2012–2013. Cultural Diversity in Australia. Can-berra: ABS, 2012 [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  303. Garcia-Moreno C, Jansen HAFM, Ellsberg M, et al. Prevalence of intimate partner violence: findings from the WHO multicountry study on women’s health and domestic violence. Lancet 2006;368:1260–9. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  304. Silverman JG, Decker MR, Saggurti N, Balaiah D, Raj A. Intimate partner violence and HIV infection among married Indian women. JAMA 2008;300:703–10. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  305. Vung ND, Ostergren PO, Krantz G. Intimate partner violence against women in rural Vietnam – different socio-demographic factors are associated with different forms of violence: Need for new intervention guidelines? BMC Public Health 2008;8. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  306. Raj A, Liu R, McCleary-Sills J, Silverman JG. South Asian victims of intimate partner violence more likely than non-victims to report sexual health concerns. J Immigr Health 2005;7:85–91. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  307. Raj A, Silverman JG. Intimate partner violence against South Asian women in greater Boston. J Am Med Womens Assoc 2002;57:111–4. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  308. Abramsky T, Watts CH, Garcia-Moreno C, et al. What factors are associated with recent intimate partner violence? Findings from the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence. BMC Public Health 2011;11. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  309. Ellsberg M, Jansen HA, Heise L, et al. Intimate partner violence and women’s physical and mental health in the WHO multi-country study on women’s health and domestic violence: an observational study. Lancet 2008;371:1165–72. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  310. Kumar S, Jeyaseelan L, Suresh S, et al. Domestic violence and its mental health correlates in Indian women. Br J Psychiatry 2005;187:62–7. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  311. Rodriguez M, Saba G. Cultural competence and intimate partner abuse: health care interventions. In: Roberts G, Hegarty K, Feder G, edi-tors. Intimate partner abuse and health professionals: New approaches to domestic violence. London: Churchill Livingstone Else-vier, 2006. p. 179–96. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  312. Hegarty K, Taft A, Feder G. Violence between intimate partners: working with the whole family. BMJ 2008;337. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  313. Mezey G, King M, MacClintock T. Victims of violence and the general practitioner. Br J Gen Pract 1998;48:906–8. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  314. NSW Health Department. NSW Health – Domestic Violence Policy Discussion Paper. Gladesville: NSW Dept Health, 1999. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  315. Coles J, Dartnall E, Astbury J. Preventing the pain when working with family and sexual violence in primary care. Int J Fam Med 2013;2013:7. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  316. Rowe L, Kidd M. First do no harm: being a resilient doctor in the 21st century. North Ryde: McGraw-Hill Australia, 2009. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  317. Weiner E, Swain G, Wolf B, Gottlieb M. A qualitative study of physicians’ own wellness-promotion practices. West J Med 2001;174:19–23. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  318. Clode D, Boldero J. Keeping the doctor alive – a self care guide book for medical practitioners. Melbourne: The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners, 2005. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  319. Hudnall-Stamm B. Secondary traumatic stress: self-care issues for clinicians, researchers and educators. Lutherville: Sidran Press, 1995. [Accessed 18 October 2013].
  320. National Centre for Posttraumatic Stress Disorder. Working with trauma survivors: what workers need to know. National Centre for Post-traumatic Stress Disorder. Washington: Department for Veteran’s Affairs, 2007 [Accessed May 2014].
  321. Saakvitne K, Pearlman L. Transforming the pain: a workbook on vicarious traumatisation. London: Norton; 1996. [Accessed May 2014].
  322. Bloom S. Caring for the Caregiver: Avoiding and Treating Vicarious Traumatization. In: Giardino A, Datner E, Asher J, editors. Sexual As-sault, Victimization Across the Lifespan. Maryland Heights: GW Medical Publishing, 2003. p. 459–70. [Accessed May 2014].
  323. Benson J, Thistlethwaite J. Mental Health Across Cultures. A practical guide for health professionals. Abingdon: Radcliffe Publishing Ltd, 2009. [Accessed May 2014].
  324. Snowdon T, Benson J, Proudfoot J. Capacity and the quality framework. Aust Fam Physician 2007;36:12–4. [Accessed May 2014].
  325. Stevenson A, Phillips C, Anderson K. Resilience among doctors who work in challenging areas: a qualitative study. Brit J Gen Pract 2011:404–10. [Accessed May 2014].
  326. Edwards N, Kornacki M, Silversin J. Unhappy doctors: what are the causes and what can be done? BMJ 2002;324:835–38. [Accessed May 2014].
  327. Freeborn D. Satisfaction, commitment, and psychological well-being among HMO physicians. West J Med 2001;174:13–28. [Accessed May 2014].
  328. Figley C. Coping with traumatic stress disorder in those who treat the traumatized. New York: Brunner/Mazel, 1995. [Accessed May 2014].
  329. Adults Surviving Child Abuse (ASCA). Best practice guidelines for working with adults surviving child abuse (Accessed 2014).
  330. Taft A, Small R, Humphreys C, Hegarty K, Walter R, Adams C, Agius P. Enhanced maternal and child health nurse care for women experi-encing intimate partner/family violence: protocol for MOVE, a cluster randomised trial of screening and referral in primary health care. BMC Public Health 2012;12:811
  331. Gath DH, Mynors-Wallis LM. Problem-solving treatment in primary care. In: Clark DM, Fairburn CG, editors. Science and practice of cog-nitive behaviour therapy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997.