National guide to a preventive health assessment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people


Chapter 4. The health of young people
Illicit drug use
☰ Table of contents


Recommendations: Preventing child maltreatment – Supporting families to optimise child safety and wellbeing

Preventive intervention type

Who is at risk?

What should be done?

How often?

Level/ strength of evidence

References

Immunisation

All young people (aged 12–24 years) Review hepatitis B immunisation and immune status and offer vaccination where indicated (refer to Chapter 14: Sexual health and blood-borne viruses) As per Australian standard vaccination schedule GPP 70

Screening

All young people Assess for presence of risk factors for illicit drug use (Box 1) As part of annual health check GPP 1, 8, 9293
Young people with risk factors for drug use (Box 1) Administer one of the following questionnaires to ascertain drug use:
  • CRAFFT screening tool (age ≤21 years)
  • Indigenous Risk Impact Screen (IRIS) tool (age ≥18 years)
  • Substances and Choices Scale (age 13–18 years)
(Refer to ‘Resources’)
Opportunistic and as followup of annual health check IIB 1, 8, 71, 72, 73, 92
Test for blood-borne viruses and sexually transmitted infection (STI) (refer to Chapter 14: Sexual health and blood-borne viruses) GPP 94

Behavioural

Young people with multiple risk factors for drug use (Box 1) Refer for preventive case management where services are available* Opportunistic IB 60
Young people who are using illicit drugs Provide brief interventions (eg in conjunction with administration of one of the above screening questionnaires) (refer also to Chapter 1: Lifestyle, ‘Introduction’, 5As framework) Opportunistic IIIB 72, 95
Refer to drug education programs based on social learning theories (eg Life Skills Training program, peer education, youth sport and recreation programs) Opportunistic IIB 60, 78, 79
Families of young people who are using illicit drugs Consider referral where appropriate to parent education programs and family intervention therapy to encourage healthy family development and reduction of parent–adolescent conflict Opportunistic IIB 83,84,85
Young people who are using injecting drugs Refer to needle and syringe exchange programs where appropriate Opportunistic IB 87

Environmental

 

Promote school completion   GPP 80, 81, 96
  Promote access to community and school-based drug education programs (based on social learning theories) IB 60,97
  Promote youth-friendly primary healthcare services GPP 1, 60, 77, 98
  Support increased access to youth workers
Support community-driven illicit drug use prevention programs (especially valuable for inhalant abuse)
IIB 78
  Support and promote community engagement strategies such as mentorship IB 60
  Support supervised injecting centres IIB 88,89,90,91
*Preventive case management involves the coordinated delivery of intensive services tailored to meet a range of developmental needs. It requires intensive case management through coordinating family intervention, after-school activity, mentoring, tutoring, individual psychiatric assessment and counselling. The approach therefore requires complex coordination across a range of service types such as health, juvenile justice, education and substance abuse. Key aspects are to assess needs, identify relevant services, coordinate service delivery and monitor outcomes. The young person (and if possible, the family) should be involved in developing the service delivery objectives.60 This can be similar to developing a care plan for people with chronic conditions.

Box 1. Risk factors for illicit drug use 56,60,61

Individual influences

  • Not completing secondary school
  • Unemployment
  • Delinquency
  • Residing in remote and very remote areas
  • Favourable attitudes to drug use
  • Sensation seeking and adventurous personality
  • Relationships with peers involved in drug use
  • Low involvement in activities with adults

Family influences

  • Parental conflict
  • Parent–adolescent conflict
  • Parental attitudes to drug use and rules around drug use
  • Alcohol and drug problems in the family

Environmental influences

  • Perceived and actual level of community drug use
  • Community disadvantage and disorganisation
  • Availability of illicit substances within the community
  • Positive media portrayal of drug use
  • Decreased presence of law enforcement


Background


Illicit drug use includes either use of illegal drugs, or inappropriate use of other substances.56 Prescription drug abuse is out of scope for this chapter. Alcohol use is covered in Chapter 1. In 2014–15, 28% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged 15–24 years reported that they had used an illicit substance in the previous 12 months. When compared with non-Indigenous youth, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth are almost twice as likely to be recent users of illicit drugs (28% compared with 16.3%), more likely to engage in risky drug use and poly-drug use, experience greater drug-related harm and are more likely to begin use at a younger age.30,56 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people living in non-remote areas were more likely than those in remote areas to have used an illicit substance in the previous year (23% compared with 19%) or earlier in their life (24% compared with 17%).
Cannabis is the most common substance used among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander and nonIndigenous people who use illicit drugs. Although the rate of cannabis use has remained stable between 2010 and 2013, the overall rate of cannabis use among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples is twice that of the non-Indigenous population (19% compared to 10%).57,58 Additionally, cannabis use in non-urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples has been ‘found to be endemic, with over 70% of males and 20% of females being current users’.59

There are no accurate data on the prevalence of volatile substance use (VSU) in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Young people aged 14–19 years are more likely than those in other age groups to have used inhalants or volatile substances and are more likely to use it frequently (once or more per month).60 Seventy-five per cent of inhalant use occurs in a person’s own home or at a friend’s home.56 The risk of inhalant use is increased in the presence of social disadvantage and family dysfunction. The use of inhalants by marginalised youth tends to be motivated by the need to relieve boredom and cope with emotional distress.56,60

Within remote Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in Western Australia, Northern Territory, South Australia and Far North Queensland, there has been an overall decline in VSU over the last ten years.61

However, youth aged 10–24 years form the majority of current users.61 In some Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, one study found that young people engaged in VSU as an expression of power (eg through its ability to provoke outrage and to control body weight through suppressing appetite).62 Aside from the acute hallucinogenic and behavioural derangement problems, the most serious long-term effect of VSU is irreversible neurological damage leading to cognitive impairment. Prenatal exposure is associated with low birthweight, prematurity, developmental delays, neurobehavioural problems and physical malformations.62 There is also emerging evidence that VSU is associated with periodontal disease and failure to thrive, and increases the risk for subsequent and earlier drug use.63,64

The 2013 National Drug Strategy Household Survey data indicate that in the general population, the average age of injecting drug users has risen from 26 to 36 years.56 A study commissioned by the Aboriginal Drug and Alcohol Council of South Australia, involving an urban Aboriginal population, found no significant differences between those aged >25 years and those aged <25 years in terms of drug use patterns. However, this was not a peer-reviewed study and there is still the problem of injecting drug use and the related harm. The report states that ‘the implication of this finding is that those under 25 years may have comparatively poorer outcomes in future years compared to their older counterparts’.65 Among the general population, sources of needles and syringes for injecting drug users are chemists (64.5%), needle and syringe programs (37.2%), friends (25%) and hospital or doctor (14.9%).56 Crystal methamphetamine (ice) use is an emerging issue for some remote and regional Aboriginal communities.66

Young people most commonly acquire illicit drugs through a friend, acquaintance or relative. Curiosity, peer pressure – including having a sense of identity and belonging – and wanting to do something exciting are the most common reasons for initiating illicit drug use. Reasons for continuing drug use are to enhance experiences, or for the excitement. Reasons for not initiating drug use are not being interested, and concerns about health, addiction and the law.56,62

There are social, legal and health-related harms associated with illicit drug use. Poly-drug use is not common among youth in general, but when it occurs is a major risk factor for subsequent drug-related harm.60,67 Harm is experienced by the individual and others. For example, in 2013, 8.3% of the population had been a victim of an illicit drug-related incident. Verbal abuse was the most frequently reported incident overall, and the proportion experiencing physical abuse by someone under the influence of illicit drugs rose from 2.2% in 2010 to 3.1% in 2013. The 2010 and 2013 National Drug Strategy Household Surveys found that illicit drug users were more likely to be diagnosed or treated for a mental illness and report high or very high levels of psychological distress compared with those who had not used an illicit drug in the previous 12 months.56 Specifically, there was a further increase in the proportion of recent users with a mental illness between 2010 and 2013.56 The biggest cause of drug-related hospitalisations was due to mental and behavioural disorders associated with amphetamine use. This hospitalisation rate was more than three times higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples than non-Indigenous people.56 In 2010–14, the rate of druginduced deaths was 1.9 times higher for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples living in New South Wales, Queensland, Western Australia, South Australia and the Northern Territory than for non-Indigenous people.30,56,68 For Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people, there are additional harms since substance dependence further compounds social deprivation, poverty, decreased cultural learning, alienation and the cycle of chronic ill health.62

Cannabis use is associated with lower educational attainment, use of other illicit drugs and criminal offending.59 Regular intoxication may interrupt crucial psychosocial development such as identity formation, interpersonal and occupational skill development. Long-term use in adolescents has been associated with decreased neurocognitive function, such as decreased intelligence quotient scores. Early exposure (before 16 years of age), has been associated with impaired attention, smaller overall brain volume, and reduction in frontal cortex volume leading to increased impulsivity.59 There have been conflicting views on whether cannabis use leads to mental health disorders. Authoritative experts concur that ‘adolescents are more likely to show serious adverse effects, that the age of onset is inversely correlated with those effects and that continuous, heavy usage of cannabis is associated with these effects’.59,60 Risk factors for cannabis dependency in adolescents are earlier age of initiation and frequency of use. There is almost a five-fold increased risk of developing dependence in those using at least weekly. Compared to adult users, young people have higher rates of binge and opportunistic cannabis use, a shorter duration between first exposure and dependence, and shorter intervals between first and second drug diagnosis.69

Risk factors for problematic drug use are highlighted in Box 1. Factors that reduce the risk of illicit drug use include a high degree of family attachment, effective parental communication and supervision, and religious participation.
The resolutions from the 4th National Indigenous Drug and Alcohol Conference in 2016 include the following recommendations to address the problem of illicit drug use among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander youth:65

  • the Australian Government Department of Prime Minister and Cabinet and Department of Health set aside funding for primary prevention activities that is available to organisations as separate core funding
  • funding for alternatives to youth detention be made available as a matter of urgency
  • specific funding for youth (12–18 years) programs such as youth residential rehabilitation be made available as a matter of urgency
  • the Australian Government reinstate funding for education programs, similar to those identified in the previous National School Drug Education Strategy.


Interventions


Evidence of effectiveness of preventive interventions

Australia is an international leader in addressing drug-related problems with the tri-pronged approach of supply reduction, demand reduction and harm reduction/minimisation. This section focuses on primary and secondary prevention interventions in the domains of demand reduction and harm minimisation. Supply reduction strategies are generally beyond the scope of primary healthcare services and are therefore not addressed here.

Immunisation

Immunisation against hepatitis B is a harm minimisation strategy to protect against the consequences of injecting drug use with contaminated needles (refer to Chapter 14: Sexual health and blood-borne viruses).70

Screening

Screening can be performed to assess individuals at risk of illicit drug use or to identify use. Illicit drug use is initiated and maintained by a complex array of biological, cognitive, psychological and sociocultural processes. Hence all of these domains should be assessed. Adolescent self-reporting of cannabis use is generally reliable, but reporting of other illicit drugs may be less reliable.69 Assessment should therefore be performed in a non-judgemental manner. In addition, illicit drug use questions are less threatening when asked in the context of a general health interview. This is best done via a comprehensive social emotional wellbeing (SEW) assessment.1,27,69 Such assessments can either be done in a routine manner17 or opportunistically in young people presenting with respiratory disorders and mental health problems, which are common presentations among cannabis users.69

The following specific screening tools have been developed to identify substance use.

The CRAFFT screening tool is a behavioural health screening tool for use with children and young people under the age of 21 years.71 It is recommended by the American Academy of Pediatrics’ Committee on Substance Abuse for use with adolescents. It consists of a series of six questions developed to screen adolescents for high-risk alcohol and other drug use disorders simultaneously. It is a short, effective screening tool meant to assess whether a longer conversation about the context of use, frequency, and other risks and consequences of alcohol and other drug use is warranted. The tool can be self-administered or administered by a clinician. It has been translated into six languages (refer to ‘Resources’ for links to the English versions).
The Indigenous Risk Impact Screen (IRIS) and brief intervention is a 13-item, two-factor screen that assesses alcohol and other drug use and associated mental health issues. It has been validated for use with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people aged ≥18 years and is included in the Department of Health and Ageing Alcohol treatment guidelines for Indigenous Australians.72 Training is a necessary prerequisite to use of the IRIS tool and is currently being provided through Queensland Health.

The Substances and Choices Scale is a tool developed in New Zealand and validated for use in people aged 13–18 years.71,73 It can also be used for repeat measures to assess change over time.

 

Behavioural

The majority of problematic illicit drug use occurs in young people with high levels of risk factors (Box 1). Programs to prevent initiation of illicit drug use should commence with younger children.60,67 There is evidence supporting the implementation of drug education, especially if based on social learning theories. Although there is limited evidence, preventive case management tailored to a young person’s developmental needs is an appealing approach for those with multiple risk factors for illicit drug use.60 Important aspects of this approach are to assess needs, identify relevant services, coordinate service delivery and monitor outcomes. It requires complex coordination across a range of service types.60 Examples include the Multisystemic Therapy (MST) and Children at Risk (CAR) programs in the US. Key elements of these programs include developing service delivery objectives in consultation with the young person and their family; collaboration between various services (eg community health, juvenile justice, drug abuse, education); and ongoing monitoring of progress. They typically require intensive case management, coordinating family intervention, after-school activity, mentoring, tutoring, individual psychiatric assessment and counselling.

Brief interventions, such as those that form part of the culturally validated IRIS program, are cautiously supported and recommended, as there is limited evidence that motivational interviewing reduces substance use.74,75 There is no evidence currently, to support brief school-based interventions.76

Environmental

The legacy of colonisation and public health interventions involving forcible isolation, incarceration, and punitive measures needs to be taken into account in addressing illicit drug use. Improved access to youthfriendly primary care services is important and has been recommended by the National Indigenous Drug and Alcohol Committee. Youth workers also have potential to positively impact on Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander young people’s resilience, although this strategy has not been formally evaluated.77

Community support and engagement is particularly important for illicit drug use programs, because of multifactorial risks and the need for multidisciplinary resources. Such factors are especially critical in addressing inhalant use, in particular petrol sniffing.78 Strategies that are devised without community input run the risk of being rejected.79 Successful community engagement strategies include mentorship, encouraging school completion, encouraging a positive school ethos, and youth sport and recreation programs.80–82 Mentorship is aimed at developing positive social relationships between young people and adults in order to support healthy role modelling. This is a promising approach and warrants further research.60 Parenting programs and other family-based interventions aimed at encouraging healthy family development and reducing parent–adolescent conflict show promise but also need further research.83–85 Youth worker brokerage programs in Central Australia are currently being evaluated.86

Successful school-based drug education programs are those based on social learning theory and that take into account causes of drug use and adolescent developmental pathways. The Life Skills Training program, peer education, and youth sport/recreation programs are recommended approaches that warrant further research.60

There is good evidence to support needle and syringe exchange programs and supervised injection centres87–91 (refer to Chapter 14: Sexual health and blood-borne viruses).
 

Resources

 
National guide to a preventive health assessment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

 





 
 
  1. Chown P, Kang M, Sanci L, Newnham V, Bennett DL. Adolescent health GP resource kit: Enhancing the skills of general practitioners in caring for young people from culturally diverse backgrounds. 2nd edn. Westmead, NSW: NSW Centre for the Advancement of Adolescent Health and Transcultural Mental Health Centre, 2008.  [Accessed 20 November 2017].
  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Young Australians: Their health and wellbeing 2011. Cat. no. PHE 140. Canberra: AIHW, 2011. [Accessed 20 November 2017].
  3. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. Definition of youth. Geneva: UNDESA, [date unknown].  [Accessed 20 November 2017].
  4. World Health Organization. Adolescents: Health risks and solutions – Fact sheet. Geneva: WHO, 2017.  [Accessed 20 November 2017].
  5. World Health Organization. Promoting and safeguarding the sexual and reproductive health of adolescents. Geneva: WHO, 2006.
  6. Institute of Medicine and National Research Council. Investing in the health and well-being of young adults. Washington, DC: The National Acadamies Press, 2015.
  7. Hwang LY, Tebb KP, Shafer MB, Pantell RH. Examination of the treatment and follow-up care for adolescents who test positive for Chlamydia trachomatis infection. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med 2005;159:1162–66.
  8. Carr-Gregg MR, Enderby KC, Grover SR. Risk-taking behaviour of young women in Australia: Screening for health-risk behaviours. Med J Aust 2003;178(12):601–04.
  9. Bradford S, Rickwood D. Psychosocial assessments for young people: A systematic review examining acceptability, disclosure and engagement, and predictive utility. Adolesc Health Med Ther 2012;3:111–25.
  10. Ham P, Allen C. Adolescent health screening and counseling. Am Fam Physician 2012;86(12):1109–16.
  11. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Contraceptive services for under 25s. Public health guideline [PH51]. UK: NICE, 2014.  [Accessed 20 November 2017].
  12. Duncan P, Frankowski B, Carey P, et al. Improvement in adolescent screening and counseling rates for risk behaviors and developmental tasks. Pediatrics 2012;130(5):e1345–51.
  13. Oscós-Sánchez MA, White D, Bajorek E, et al. SAFE TEENS: Facilitators of and barriers to adolescent preventive care discussions. Fam Med 2008;40(2):125–31.
  14. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census 2011. Australia: ABS, 2011. [Accessed 20 November 2017].
  15. van der Sterren A, Greenhalgh E, Knoche D, Winstanley M. Prevalence of tobacco use among Aboriginal peoples and Torres Strait Islanders. In: Scollo MM, Winstanley MH. Tobacco in Australia: Facts and issues. Melbourne: Cancer Council Victoria, 2016.
  16. Queensland Health. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adolescent sexual health guideline. Brisbane: Queensland Health, 2013.  [Accessed 20 November 2017].
  17. Elster A. Guidelines for adolescent preventive services. US: United States Preventive Services Task Force, updated 2017.  [Accessed 20 February 2017].
  18. UK Department of Health. You’re welcome – Quality criteria for young people friendly health services. London: Department of Health, 2011.
  19. Walker R. The Youth Education Peers (YEP) Project final report. Perth: Youth Affairs Council of Western Australia, 2011.
  20. Beall S. Talking with teens: Successfully screening for high-risk behavior. J Soc Pediatr Nurs 2000;5(3):139–42.
  21. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality. Guide to clinical preventive services, 2014. Recommendations of the US Preventive Services Task Force. Pub. no. 14-05158. Rockville, MD: AHRQ, 2014.
  22. Klein DA, Goldenring JM, Adelman WP. HEEADSSS 3.0: The psychosocial interview for adolescents updated for a new century fueled by media. Ohio: Modern Medicine Network, 2014.
  23. Christie D, Viner R. Adolescent development. BMJ 2005;330(7486):301–04.
  24. NSW Ministry of Health. Youth Health 2015: Report on the annual survey of the NSW Youth Health Policy 2011–16. North Sydney, NSW: NSW Ministry of Health, 2016. [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  25. Graybeal C. Strengths-based social work assessment: Transforming the dominant paradigm. Families in Society: Journal of Contemporary Social Services 2001;82(3):233–42.
  26. Brough M, Bond C, Hunt J. Strong in the city: Towards a strength based approach in Indigenous health promotion. Health Promot J Austr 2004;15(3):215–20.
  27. Nori A, Piovesan R, O’Connor J, Rigney D, McMillan MM, Brown N. ‘Y Health – Staying Deadly’: An Aboriginal Youth focussed Translational Action Research Project. Canberra: ANU, 2014.
  28. Goldenring J, Rosen D. Getting into adolescent heads: An essential update. Contemporary Pediatrics 2004:21:64.
  29. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia’s mothers and babies 2014 – In brief. Cat. no. PER 87. Canberra: AIHW, 2016.
  30. Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet. Overview of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health status, 2015. Perth: Australian Indigenous Health InfoNet, 2016.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  31. World Health Organization. Adolescent pregnancy: Fact sheet. Geneva: WHO, 2016.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  32. State of Victoria. Teenage pregnancy. Vic: Better Health Channel, [date unknown].  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  33. Hutchinson M, Joyce A, Cheong M. Induced abortions in Western Australia 2010–2012. Fourth report of the Western Australian abortion notification system. WA: DoH, 2013.
  34. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey, 2004–05. Cat. no. 4715.0. Canberra: ABS, 2006; p. 47.
  35. Walker D, Torres P, Gutierrez J, Flemming K, Bertozzi S. Emergency contraception use is correlated with increased condom use among adolescents: Results from Mexico. J Adolesc Health 2004;35(4):329–34.
  36. Killoran A, McCormick G. Towards an integrated approach to sexual health services: The contribution of NICE guidance on one-toone interventions to prevent STIs and under 18 conceptions. Health Educ J 2010;69(3):297–310.
  37. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Sexually transmitted infections and under-18 conceptions: Prevention. Public health guideline [PH3]. UK: NICE, 2007.
  38. Minnesota Department of Health. Anticipatory guidance 13–21 years. St Paul, MN: Minnesota Department of Health, 2017.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  39. Polis CB, Schaffer K, Blanchard K, Glasier A, Harper CC, Grimes DA. Advance provision of emergency contraception for pregnancy prevention: A meta-analysis. Obstet Gynecol 2007;110(6):1379–88.
  40. American Psychological Association. Developing adolescents: A reference for professionals. Washington, DC: APA, 2002.
  41. Robinson E. Young people and their parents: Supporting families through changes that occur in adolescence. Australia: Child Family Community Australia, 2006.
  42. Robinson E, Power L, Allan D. What works with adolescents? Family connections and involvement in interventions for adolescent problem behaviours. AFRC Briefing no. 16. Melbourne: Australian Institute of Family Studies, 2010.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  43. Hofmeyr GJ, Singata M, Lawrie TA. Copper containing intra-uterine devices versus depot progestogens for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010;(6):CD007043.
  44. Tang JH, Lopez LM, Mody S, Grimes DA. Hormonal and intrauterine methods for contraception for women aged 25 years and younger. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD009805.
  45. Deans EI, Grimes DA. Intrauterine devices for adolescents: A systematic review. Contraception 2009;79(6):418–23.
  46. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Long-acting reversible contraception. Clinical guideline [CG30]. UK: NICE, 2005.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  47. Power J, French R, Cowan FM. Subdermal implantable contraceptives versus other forms of reversible contraceptives or other implants as effective methods for preventing pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2007;(3):CD001326.
  48. Lopez LM, Newmann SJ, Grimes DA, Nanda K, Schulz KF. Immediate start of hormonal contraceptives for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2008;(2):CD006260.
  49. McGaurr L. Young Australians and sexual health. Canberra: Australian Clearinghouse for Youth Studies, 2015.
  50. Lopez LM, Grey TW, Chen M, Tolley EE, Stockton LL. Theory‐based interventions for contraception. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2016;11:CD007249.
  51. Thomas J, Vigurs C, Oliver K, et al. Targeted youth support: Rapid Evidence Assessment of effective early interventions for youth at risk of future poor outcomes. London: Institute of Education University of London, 2008.
  52. DiCenso A, Guyatt G, Willan A, Griffith L. Interventions to reduce unintended pregnancies among adolescents: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials. BMJ 2002;324(7351):1426–30.
  53. Speizer IS, Magnani RJ, Colvin CE. The effectiveness of adolescent reproductive health interventions in developing countries: A review of the evidence. J Adolesc Health 2003;33(5):324–48.
  54. World Health Organization. Core competencies in adolescent health and development for primary care providers: Including a tool to assess the adolescent health and development component in pre-service education of health-care providers. Geneva: WHO, 2015.
  55. Family Health International. Behavior change – A summary of four major theories. Durham, NC: FHI, 2004.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  56. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. National Drug Strategy Household Survey detailed report: 2013. Cat. no. PHE 183. Canberra: AIHW, 2014.
  57. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health survey 2012–13. Canberra: ABS, 2013. Available at  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  58. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The health and welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples: 2015. Cat. no. IHW 147. Canberra: AIHW, 2015.
  59. Al Iede M, Nunn K, Milne B, Fitzgerald DA. The consequences of chronic cannabis smoking in vulnerable adolescents. Paediatr Respir Rev 2017;24:44–53.
  60. Loxley W, Toumbourou JW, Stockwell T, et al. The prevention of substance use, risk and harm in Australia: A review of the evidence. Monograph prepared by the National Drug Research Institute and the Centre for Adolescent Health. Canberra: Department of Health and Ageing, 2004.
  61. d’Abbs P, Shaw G. Monitoring trends in the prevalence of petrol sniffing in selected Australian Aboriginal communities 2011–2014: Final report. Darwin: Menzies School of Health Research, 2016.
  62. Marel C, MacLean SJ, Midford R. Review of volatile substance use among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Perth: Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet, 2015.
  63. Jamieson L, Gunthorpe W, Cairney S, Sayers S, Roberts-Thomson K, Slade G. Substance use and periodontal disease among Australian Aboriginal young adults. Addiction 2010;105(4):719–26.
  64. Crossin R, Cairney S, Lawrence AJ, Duncan JR. Adolescent inhalant abuse leads to other drug use and impaired growth; implications for diagnosis. Aust N Z J Public Health 2017;41(1):99–104.
  65. Aboriginal Drug and Alcohol Council. Conference resolutions: Paper presented at 4th National Indigenous Drug and Alcohol Conference, 2016. Adelaide: Aboriginal Drug and Alcohol Council, 2016.
  66. Commonwealth of Australia. Final report of the National Ice Taskforce. Australia: Department of the Prime Minister and Cabinet, 2015. Available at www.pmc.gov.au/sites/default/files/publications/national_ice_taskforce_final_report.pdf [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  67. Stockwell T, Gruenewald P, Toumbourou J, Loxley W, eds. Preventing harmful substance use: The evidence base for policy and practice. West Sussex, UK: John Wiley & Sons, 2005.
  68. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Health Survey 2012–13. Canberra: ABS, 2014.
  69. Bashford J. Screening and assessment for cannabis use disorders. Background paper for Management of cannabis use disorder and related issues: A clinician’s guide. Sydney: National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre, 2009.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  70. Australian Technical Advisory Group on Immunisation. The Australian immunisation handbook. 10th edn. Canberra: Department of Health, 2017.
  71. New Zealand Guidelines Group. Identification of common mental disorders and management of depression in primary care. Wellington: New Zealand Guidelines Group, 2008.
  72. Department of Health and Ageing. Alcohol treatment guidelines for Indigenous Australians. Canberra: DoHA, 2007.
  73. Christie G, Marsh R, Sheridan J, et al. The substances and choices scale (SACS) – The development and testing of a new alcohol and other drug screening and outcome measurement instrument for young people. Addiction Sep 2007;102(9):1390–98.
  74. Schlesinger CM, Ober C, McCarthy MM, Watson JD, Seinen A. The development and validation of the Indigenous Risk Impact Screen (IRIS): A 13-item screening instrument for alcohol and drug and mental health risk. Drug Alcohol Rev 2007;26(2):109–17.
  75. Smedslund G, Berg RC, Hammerstrøm KT, et al. Motivational interviewing for substance abuse. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2011;(5):CD008063.
  76. Carney T, Myers BJ, Louw J, Okwundu CI. Brief school-based interventions and behavioural outcomes for substance-using adolescents. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(2):CD008969.
  77. Gray D, Stearne A, Wilson M, Doyle M. Indigenous-specific alcohol and other drug interventions: Continuities, changes and areas of greatest need. Canberra: Australian National Council on Drugs, 2010.
  78. MacLean S, d’Abbs P. Petrol sniffing in Aboriginal communities: A review of interventions. Drug Alcohol Rev 2002;21(1):65–72.
  79. Gray D, Saggers S. Indigenous Australian alcohol and other drug issues: Research from the National Drug Institute. Perth: National Drug Research Institute, 2002.
  80. McCain MN, Mustard JF. Reversing the brain drain: Early years study: Final report. Toronto: Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, 1999.
  81. Shonkoff JP, Phillips DA, eds. From neurons to neighborhoods: The science of early childhood development. Washington, DC: NRCIM, 2000.
  82. Shonkoff JP, Meisels SJ, eds. Handbook of early childhood intervention. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  83. Centre for Reviews and Dissemination. Parenting programmes for preventing tobacco, alcohol or drugs misuse in children <18: A systematic review. Database of Abstracts of Reviews of Effects, 2011.
  84. Toumbourou J, Gregg M. Impact of an empowerment-based parent education program on the reduction of youth suicide risk factors. J Adolesc Health 2002;31(3):277–85.
  85. Bry B, Catalano R, Kumpfer K, Lochman J. Scientific findings from family prevention intervention research. In: Ashery R, Robertson E, Kumpfer K, eds. Drug abuse prevention through family interventions: NIDA research monograph 177. Rockville, MD: US Department of Human Services, 1998; p. 103–29.
  86. Marel C, Mills K, Shakeshaft A, Shand F, Teesson M. Evaluation of the CAYLUS Youth Worker Brokerage: Executive summary 2014–2016. NSW: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, 2016.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  87. Contributors to the Cochrane Collaborative and the Campbell Collaboration. Evidence from systematic reviews of research relevant to implementing the ‘wider public health’ agenda. York: NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, 2000.
  88. Kaldor J, Lapsley H, Mattick R, Weatherburn D. Six month process report on the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, 2002.
  89. Kaldor J, Lapsley H, Mattick R, Weatherburn D, Kimber J, MacDonald M. Twelve-month process evaluation report on the Medically Supervised Injecting Centre. Sydney: National Drug and Alcohol Research Centre, 2002.
  90. Salmon A, van Beek I, Amin J, Kaldor J, Maher L. The impact of a supervised injecting facility on ambulance call-outs in Sydney, Australia. Addiction 2010;105(4):676–83.
  91. MSIC Evaluation Committee. Final report on the evaluation of the Sydney Medically Supervised Injecting Centre. Sydney: MSIC Evaluation Committee, 2003.
  92. Ma Jun WY, Stafford RS. US adolescents receive suboptimal preventive counseling during ambulatory care. J Adolesc Health 2005;36(5):441e441–47.
  93. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Drug misuse prevention: Targeted interventions. UK: NICE, 2017.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  94. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Hepatitis B and C testing: People at risk of infection. UK: NICE, 2012.  [Accessed 21 November 2017].
  95. Martin G. Adolescents. Background paper for Management of cannabis use disorder and related issues: A clinician’s guide. Sydney: National Cannabis Prevention and Information Centre, 2009.
  96. Shonkoff JP, Meisels SJ, eds. Handbook of early childhood intervention. 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
  97. Faggiano F, Minozzi S, Versino E, Buscemi D. Universal school-based prevention for illicit drug use. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2014;(12):CD003020.
  98. Westerman T. Engaging Australian Aboriginal youth in mental health services. Australian Psychologist 2010;45(3):212–22.
  99. Sanci L. Adolescent health care principles. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2001.
  100. Australian Bureau of Statistics. The health and welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, 2008. Cat. no. 4704.0. Canberra: AIHW and ABS, 2008.  [Accessed 20 May 2013].
  101. Browne J, Laurence S, Thorpe S. Acting on food insecurity in urban Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities: Policy and practice interventions to improve local access and supply of nutritious food. Perth: Australian Indigenous HealthInfoNet, 2009.  [Accessed 20 May 2013].
  102. Menzies School of Health. Resources: Child health clinical audit. Darwin: Menzies School of Health, 2014.  [Accessed 18 December 2017].
  103. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Measuring the social and emotional wellbeing of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. Cat. no. IHW 24. Canberra: AIHW, 2009: 5–6.