National guide to a preventive health assessment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people


Chapter 1. Lifestyle
Alcohol
☰ Table of contents


Recommendations: Alcohol

Preventive intervention type

Who is at risk?

What should be done?

How often?

Level/ strength of evidence

References

Screening

All people aged ≥15 years Ask about the quantity and frequency of alcohol consumption to detect risky/high-risk drinkers (Box 1)

Useful tools for assessment of physical activity include the UK General Practice Physical Activity Questionnaire (refer to ‘Resources’)
During the annual health assessment or in response to potential alcohol-related disease IA–IB 7, 47
More frequent assessment is recommended for high-risk groups (Box 3) Opportunistic and as part of annual health assessments I–IIIB 47
Use structured questionnaires such as Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT), AUDIT-C* or Indigenous Risk Impact Screen (IRIS) to assess drinking (refer to ‘Resources’; note that these tools may require some adaptation to local community needs) As part of an annual health assessment, or opportunistic IA–IB 18,  39,  48
People aged 10-14 years Consider sensitive and age-appropriate alcohol intake screening in children and adolescents between the ages of 10 and 14 (refer to Chapter 4: The health of young people)

Parental or carer involvement may be required and referral should be considered
As part of an annual health assessment or in response to potential alcohol-related disorders/other risky behavior II 9,  1149
People with risky or high-risk drinking levels Review for comorbid physical or mental health disorders and other chronic disease risk factors

Perform comprehensive alcohol assessment such as AUDIT-C and consider brief intervention.

For those with dependence, consider specialist referral where necessary
As part of an annual health assessment IA 18,  47,  50

Behavioural

People with hazardous and harmful drinking levels Offer brief interventions for the reduction of alcohol consumption as first-line treatment. Consider using tools such as FLAGS and 5As approach (refer to Box 2 and Chapter 1: Lifestyle, ‘Introduction’)

Note: Brief intervention alone is not sufficient for people with severe alcohol-related problems or alcohol dependence. Strongly consider more extended intervention and/or referral
Opportunistic and as part of an annual health assessment IA 18,  47,  50
Women who are pregnant, breastfeeding, seeking preconception counselling Advise to abstain from alcohol, explain the risks to the unborn child and emphasise the benefits of not drinking (refer to Box 1 and ‘Resources’)

Advise breastfeeding mothers abstinence from alcohol is the safest option, especially in the first month post-partum. For those choosing to drink, alcohol intake should be limited to no more than two standard drinks per day. Try to breastfeed before drinking. Continue to promote breastfeeding
Pregnant women – at all antenatal visits, as appropriate

For all others, opportunistic screening as part of an annual health assessment
IA 18,  19,  22

Environmental

 

Promote community-led strategies to reduce alcohol supply, including advocacy for:
  • ‘dry communities’ in areas with high numbers of alcohol-related harms
  • restrictions to liquor licensing hours or changes to other licensing conditions
  • better, proactive policing of responsible service of alcohol
  • community development initiatives
  • initiatives to engage young people
  • school or classroom-based  educational sessions
  GPP 39, 51,  52,  53
*Using AUDIT-C, it is recommended that those who reach a cut-off score of equal to or greater than 5 are deemed to be ‘at risk’, those with a score equal to or greater than 6 ‘high risk’, and those with a score equal to or greater than 9 are potentially alcohol dependent.33

Box 1. National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) guidelines for safer alcohol use19

  1. For healthy men and women, drinking no more than two standard drinks on any day reduces the lifetime risk of harm from alcohol-related disease or injury.
  2. For healthy men and women, drinking no more than four standard drinks on a single occasion reduces the risk of alcohol-related injury arising from that occasion.
  3. For children and young people under 18 years of age, not drinking alcohol is the safest option.
    • Parents and carers should be advised that children under 15 years of age are at the greatest risk of harm from drinking and that for this age group, not drinking alcohol is especially important.
    • For young people aged 15−17 years, the safest option is to delay the initiation of drinking for as long as possible.
  4. Maternal alcohol consumption can harm the developing fetus or breastfeeding baby.
    • For women who are pregnant or planning a pregnancy, not drinking is the safest option.
    • For women who are breastfeeding, not drinking is the safest option

Box 2. The FLAGS framework for brief intervention18

Feedback

  1. Provide individualised feedback about the risks associated with continued drinking, based on current drinking patterns, problem indicators and health status.
  2. Discuss the potential health problems that can arise from risky alcohol use.

Listen

  1. Listen to the patient’s response.
  2. This should spark a discussion of the patient’s consumption level and how it relates to general population consumption and any false beliefs held by the patient.

Advice

  1. Give clear advice about the importance of changing current drinking patterns and a recommended level of consumption.
  2. A typical five-minute to 10-minute brief intervention should involve advice on reducing consumption in a persuasive but non-judgemental way.
  3. Advice can be supported by self-help materials, which provide information about the potential harms of risky alcohol consumption and can provide additional motivation to change.

Goals

  1. Discuss the safe drinking limits and assist the patient to set specific goals for changing patterns of consumption.
  2. Instil optimism in the patient that his or her chosen goals can be achieved.
  3. It is in this step, in particular, that motivation-enhancing techniques are used to encourage patients to develop, implement and commit to plans to stop drinking.

Strategies

  1. Ask the patient to suggest some strategies for achieving these goals.
  2. This approach emphasises the individual’s choice to reduce drinking patterns and allows them to choose the approach best suited to their own situation.
  3. The individual might consider setting a specific limit on alcohol consumption, learning to recognise the antecedents of drinking, and developing skills to avoid drinking in high-risk situations, pacing one’s drinking and learning to cope with everyday problems that lead to drinking.

 

Box 3. High-risk groups that require more frequent screening and close attention

  • Adolescents and young adults
  • Pregnant women/those planning pregnancy
  • Illicit drug users/other substance misusers
  • Those with a family history of alcohol dependence
  • People with mental illness
  • Those with medical conditions that may be worsened by alcohol consumption; conditions include:
    • cardiovascular disease (CVD)
    • arrhythmia
    • liver disease
    • diabetes
    • hypertension



Background


Consumption of harmful quantities of alcohol is a leading risk factor contributing to global disease burden and is associated with over 200 diseases and injuries, particularly dependence, liver cirrhosis, cancer and both accidental and non-accidental injury.1 Alcohol consumption is associated with the majority of disease burden from road traffic accidents and with social problems such as aggression and violence, family breakdown and child abuse or neglect.2 Consequentially, alcohol-related harm is not merely a relevant issue for individual drinkers but also affects families and the broader community.1

While alcohol consumption at any level may increase the risk of ill-health and injury (Box 1), there are some reported benefits from low-level consumption for some conditions and in some population subgroups; however, this remains a controversial topic of much debate.3 Habitual low-level daily drinking (one standard drink for women, two standard drinks for men) is associated with reductions in all-cause mortality, diabetes, coronary artery disease and stroke in certain age groups, but this is when comparing regular low-level drinking with heavy episodic (or binge) drinking.4 Low-level drinking has been associated with slightly increased risk of breast cancer;5 however, at high-risk levels, the chance of harm increases exponentially, particularly for all-cause mortality, cardiovascular diseases including non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation, a variety of cancers6 and both ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke. It is therefore not recommended for healthcare professionals to actively advise low-level alcohol consumption given its strong potential for alcohol dependence even in low-risk individuals.

Surveys in the US have shown alcohol consumption in young people aged 9–18 years is common, with reported use of alcohol increasing ten-fold from 7% of 12-year-olds to 70% of 18-year-olds.7,8 Drinking in adolescence is associated with increased risk of injury and high-risk health behaviours, such as unprotected sex. It is also a risk factor for suicide and for dependency later in life.9 Alcohol use in Australian young people is correlated with the number of licensed outlets in the area.10 The prevalence of drinking in this age group is often underestimated and consequentially undetected,9 emphasising the importance of routinely screening for alcohol consumption in primary care settings. There are currently no validated age-appropriate screening tools. However, recent development of web-based and smart-phone screening and intervention applications may be useful in these age groups.11 It is important to note that hazardous adolescent use of alcohol may be associated with psychosocial and intergenerational trauma.12

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are less likely than the general Australian population to drink, but the prevalence of harmful drinking and alcohol-related morbidity and mortality is much greater. In 2012–13, 28%13 of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults had not consumed alcohol in the previous 12 months, compared with 15% of non-Indigenous adults; however, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults are twice as likely to binge drink compared to non-Indigenous adults (17% versus 8%).14 In 2014–15, 14.7% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people exceeded the lifetime risk guidelines for alcohol consumption, versus 17.5% of non-Indigenous people.15,16 Within the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander population there is a high association between alcohol consumption and contact within the criminal justice system, especially for males; those males who exhibited high-level/risky alcohol consumption are 29% more likely than those with low-level alcohol consumption to have been arrested in the previous five years.16,17

Alcohol crosses the placenta and can cause harm to a developing fetus, therefore current guidelines recommend no level of drinking is safe in the peri-conception period, during pregnancy or when breastfeeding.18,19 Alcohol use in pregnancy is associated with a range of behavioural disorders and fetal alcohol spectrum disorder (refer to Chapter 3: Child health, ‘Fetal alcohol spectrum disorder’). Despite the potential harms from alcohol consumption during pregnancy, survey data suggest it is common.20 In 2014–15, 9.8% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander mothers drank alcohol during pregnancy, although this had decreased substantially from previous surveys (eg 19.6% in 2008). Overall, 56% of Australian women reported drinking during pregnancy, and 26% of these continued to drink after becoming aware of the pregnancy.21 A recent review suggested an inefficiency in current public health methods to tackle alcohol use during pregnancy, and recommended that further research, particularly in the field of public health evaluation of current methods, is required.22


Interventions


The Australian guidelines are currently being revised, but four existing recommendations are outlined in Box 1. There is strong evidence for screening in primary care to identify individuals consuming risky levels of alcohol, using quantity–frequency estimates. Combined with brief intervention, this technique has been associated with decreased alcohol consumption by an average of four standard drinks per week.23,24 Brief interventions have been shown to be effective in patients with unhealthy drinking patterns, but there is little evidence for effectiveness in those with dependence.25 For those patients, more intensive intervention is usually required.

Brief interventions include methods such as those highlighted in the FLAGS (Feedback, Listen, Advice, Goals, Strategy) framework for brief intervention (Box 2); these are most appropriate and effective in nondependent drinkers who are drinking at risky levels.26 Screening and brief intervention has a strong evidence base and in addition to environmental primary prevention measures such as reducing the availability and accessibility of alcohol, is the most effective method for decreasing an individual’s alcohol consumption.18,27 Screening in primary care settings can, importantly, detect those whose current drinking places them at increased risk of morbidity and mortality.28 Barriers for screening and brief interventions include lack of confidence/knowledge from healthcare workers, lack of organisational support and financial incentive, and perceived patient embarrassment/discomfort with discussing alcohol.29 Despite this, studies have shown that patients are generally accepting of their doctor enquiring about alcohol consumption. Furthermore, training may assist health workers with gaining more confidence and knowledge surrounding brief interventions. The FLAGS framework (Box 2) is recommended by The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners (RACGP) as part of the management of problematic drinking.30

Given alcohol-related harm tends to present late, systematic screening is recommended. There remains no clear evidence regarding the optimal frequency of screening for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Screening can be performed via a simple patient history as part of routine consultation, or using brief questionnaires as an aid. The recommended and most sensitive of the screening tools is the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) tool (refer to ‘Resources’), which assesses level of drinking, dependency and experience of harm.31,32 The AUDIT-C tool provides a shorter version for circumstances where time is limited. Neither tool has been specifically, nor reliably, validated in the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations. However, some studies have demonstrated their value33,34 and currently they are the most commonly used tools in this population.35 Using AUDIT-C, it is recommended that those who reach a cut-off score of equal to or greater than 5 are deemed to be ‘at risk’, those with a score equal to or greater than 6 ‘high risk’, and those with a score equal to or greater than 9 are potentially alcohol dependent.33

Alternatively, the Indigenous Risk Impact Screen (IRIS) (refer to ‘Resources’) tool can be used. It comprises 13 questions designed to assist in identifying drug and alcohol problems, along with mental health risks, in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people.36 The IRIS tool has proven to be consistent with other screening tools such as AUDIT and is recommended as a brief screening tool for use with the Aboriginal and Torres
Strait Islander people.28,37

The CAGE tool has been used in many Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health settings to screen for hazardous drinking, but has been reported to have very low sensitivity for detecting risky or hazardous drinking.38 According to the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality in the US, it is not recommended as a screening test for identifying risky or hazardous drinking or for screening for the full spectrum of alcohol misuse.31 Measures such as liver function tests should not be relied on as a primary screen for alcohol dependency and should only be used as adjuncts owing to their low sensitivity and specificity.18

Positive outcomes when tackling risky drinking in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations are more likely to be attained if screening  and interventions are delivered in a respectful, non-judgemental and culturally appropriate manner.39 Current alcohol screening and intervention techniques need to be adapted for use in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander populations, rather than simply transferred; this involves collaboration and partnerships with communities, in the setting of community control.39,40
Effective alcohol management programs (AMPs) have an important role to play in reducing alcohol-related harms, and they do not merely restrict alcohol sales. AMPs are more likely to be successful when they are introduced voluntarily and led by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander agencies. They should be fully implemented and comprehensive, and should include a number of activities and resources to support individuals and communities to build capacity and make meaningful changes.41

Community engagement and control, particularly for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, has been shown to be an effective prevention method, along with harm reduction strategies such as community patrols and sobering-up shelters.42 It is important to note that informal communication and counselling methods such as ‘yarning’ are highly valued in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities.43 Imposed programs to address alcohol consumption, such as having alcohol-managed communities, have not proven effective in tackling problem drinking in Aboriginal in Torres Strait islander populations in Queensland; indeed, there have been unintended effects of binge drinking and cannabis use observed.42,44,45 There is emerging evidence surrounding the benefits of using modern technologies such as text messaging, phone counselling and online resources as health promotion, screening and intervention tools. Young Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people have expressed a preference for use of technologies as a contact method for formal help-seeking services.43 Studies in other populations have shown that text message interventions can reduce alcohol consumption in young adults.46
 

Resources

National guide to a preventive health assessment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people

 





 
 
  1. World Health Organisation. Global status report on alcohol and health 2014.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  2. Dube SR, Anda RF, Felitti VJ, Croft JB, Edwards VJ, Giles WH. Growing up with parental alcohol abuse. Child Abuse Negl 2001;25(12):1627–40.
  3. Roerecke M, Rehm J. Alcohol consumption, drinking patterns, and ischemic heart disease: A narrative review of meta-analyses and a systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of heavy drinking occasions on risk for moderate drinkers. BMC Med 2014;12(1):e28–20.
  4. O’Keefe JH, Bhatti SK, Bajwa A, DiNicolantonio JJ, Lavie CJ. Alcohol and cardiovascular health: The dose makes the poison ... or the remedy. Mayo Clin Proc 2014;89(3):382–93.
  5. Chen WY, Rosner B, Hankinson SE, Colditz GA, Willett WC. Moderate alcohol consumption during adult life, drinking patterns, and breast cancer risk. JAMA 2011;306(17):1884–14.
  6. Bagnardi V, Rota M, Botteri E, et al. Alcohol consumption and site-specific cancer risk: A comprehensive dose–response metaanalysis. Br J Cancer 2014;112(3):580–93.
  7. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Alcohol alert. An update – New clinician’s guide 2005.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  8. Chung T, Smith GT, Donovan JE, et al. Drinking frequency as a brief screen for adolescent alcohol problems. Pediatrics 2012;129(2):205–12.
  9. National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism. Alcohol screening and brief intervention for youth: A practitioner’s guide 2015.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  10. Azar D, White V, Coomber K, et al. The association between alcohol outlet density and alcohol use among urban and regional Australian adolescents. Addiction 2017;111(1):65–72.
  11. Patton R, Deluca P, Kaner E, Newbury-Birch D, Phillips T, Drummond C. Alcohol screening and brief intervention for adolescents: The how, what and where of reducing alcohol consumption and related harm among young people. Alcohol Alcohol 2014;49(2):207–12.
  12. Kelly J, Harrison R, Palmer A. Trauma and youth alcohol and drug use: Findings from a youth outpatient treatment service. JAYS 2016;1(2):1–2.
  13. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander health survey: First results, Australia, 2012–13. ABS: 2013. [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  14. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Substance use among Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. Canberra: AIHW, 2011.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  15. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National health survey: First results, 2014–15. ABS: 2015.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  16. Australian Bureau of Statistics. National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander social survey, 2014–15. ABS: 2016.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  17. Australian Bureau of Statistics. The health and welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples. ABS: 2010. Available at  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  18. Haber P, Lintzeris N, Proude E, Lopatko O. Guidelines for the treatment of alcohol problems. Canberra: Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing, 2009. [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  19. National Health and Medical Research Council. Australian guidelines: To reduce health risks from drinking alcohol. Canberra: NHMRC, 2009.
  20. Hutchinson D, Moore EA, Breen C, Bums L, Mattick RP. Alcohol use in pregnancy: Prevalence and predictors in the longitudinal study of Australian children. Drug Alcohol Rev 2017;32(5):475–82.
  21. Foundation for Alcohol Research and Education. FARE 2017. Available at www.fare.org.au/wp-content/uploads/research/AlcoholConsumption-During-Pregnancy-Final.pdf [Accessed February 2018].
  22. Crawford-Williams F, Fielder A, Mikocka-Walus A, Esterman A. A critical review of public health interventions aimed at reducing alcohol consumption and/or increasing knowledge among pregnant women. Drug Alcohol Rev 2015;34(2):154–61.
  23. Kaner E, Bland M, Cassidy P, et al. Effectiveness of screening and brief alcohol intervention in primary care (SIPS trial): Pragmatic cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ 2013;346:e8501.
  24. Tam CWM, Knight A, Liaw S-T. Alcohol screening and brief interventions in primary care – Evidence and a pragmatic practice-based approach. Aust Fam Physician 2016;45(10):767–70.
  25. Saitz R. Alcohol screening and brief intervention in primary care: Absence of evidence for efficacy in people with dependence or very heavy drinking. Drug Alcohol Rev 2010;29(6):631–40.
  26. McQueen JM, Ballinger C, Howe TE. Factors associated with alcohol reduction in harmful and hazardous drinkers following alcohol brief intervention in Scotland: A qualitative enquiry. BMC Health Serv Res 2017;17(1):838–17.
  27. Pennay A, Lubman DI, Frei M. Alcohol: Prevention, policy and primary care responses. Aust Fam Physician 2014;43(6):356–61.
  28. Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing. Alcohol treatment guidelines for Indigenous Australians. Canberra: DoHA, 2007.
  29. Johnson M, Jackson R, Guillaume L, Meier P, Goyder E. Barriers and facilitators to implementing screening and brief intervention for alcohol misuse: A systematic review of qualitative evidence. J Public Health 2011;33(3):412–21.
  30. Demirkol A, Conigrave K, Haber P. Problem drinking – Management in general practice. Aust Fam Physician 2011;40(576-582):1–6.
  31. Babor TF, Higgins-Biddle JC, Saunders JB, Monteiro MG. Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) instrument. 2nd edn. Geneva: World Health Organisation, 2002.
  32. Jonas DE, Garbutt JC, Brown JM, et al. Screening, behavioral counseling, and referral in primary care to reduce alcohol misuse. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, 2012.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  33. Calabria B, Clifford A, Shakeshaft AP, et al. Identifying Aboriginal-specific AUDIT-C and AUDIT-3 cutoff scores for at-risk, high-risk, and likely dependent drinkers using measures of agreement with the 10-item Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test. Addict Sci Clin Pract 2014;9(1):17–11.
  34. Noble N, Paul C, Conigrave K, Lee K, Blundell S, Turon H. Does a retrospective seven-day alcohol diary reflect usual alcohol intake for a predominantly disadvantaged Australian Aboriginal population? Subst Use Misuse 2017;50(3):1–6.
  35. Health NTDO. The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (Audit – C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinkers (2011). Darwin: Department of Health, 2011.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  36. Ober C. Indigenous Risk Impact Screen and Brief Intervention (IRIS). Social and Emotional Wellbeing and Mental Health Services in Aboriginal Australia, 2016.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  37. Schlesinger C, Ober C, Mccarthy M, Watson J, Seinen A. The development and validation of the Indigenous Risk Impact Screen (IRIS): A 13-item screening instrument for alcohol and drug and mental health risk. Drug Alcohol Rev 2007;26(2):109–17.
  38. US Preventive Services Task Force. Alcohol misuse: Screening and Behavioral Counselling Interventions in Primary Care. USPSTF, 2013.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  39. Wilson M, Gray A, Stearne A, Saggers S. Review of the harmful use of alcohol amongst Indigenous Australians. Australian Indigenous Health Info, 2010.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  40. Gray D, Wilson M, Allsop S, Saggers S, Wilkes E, Ober C. Barriers and enablers to the provision of alcohol treatment among Aboriginal Australians: A thematic review of five research projects. Drug Alcohol Rev 2014;33(5):482–90.
  41. The Royal Australasian College of Physicians and The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Psychiatrists’ Alcohol Policy. Sydney, 2016.  [Accessed February 2018].
  42. Gray D, Wilkes E. Closing the Gap Clearing House: Reducing alcohol and other drug related harm. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, 2010.
  43. Price M, Dalgleish J. Help-seeking among indigenous Australian adolescents: Exploring attitudes, behaviours and barriers. Youth Studies Australia 2013;2(1):10–8.
  44. Robertson JA, Fitts MS, Clough AR. Unintended impacts of alcohol restrictions on alcohol and other drug use in Indigenous communities in Queensland (Australia). Int J Drug Policy 2017;41:34–40.
  45. Clough AR, Margolis SA, Miller A, et al. Alcohol management plans in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) Australian communities in Queensland: Community residents have experienced favourable impacts but also suffered unfavourable ones. BMC Public Health 2017;17(1):59–21.
  46. Suffoletto B, Kristan J, Callaway C, et al. A text message alcohol intervention for young adult emergency department patients: A randomized clinical trial. Ann Emerg Med 2014;64(6):664–4.
  47. National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Prevention and early identification of alcohol-use disorders. NICE, 2015.  [Accessed 3 November 2017].
  48. Shakeshaft A, Clifford A, Shakeshaft M. Reducing alcohol related harm experienced by Indigenous Australians: Identifying opportunities for Indigenous primary health care services. Aust N Z J Public Health 2010;34 Suppl 1:S41–5.
  49. Dir AL, Coskunpinar A, Cyders MA. A meta-analytic review of the relationship between adolescent risky sexual behavior and impulsivity across gender, age, and race. Clin Psychol Rev 2014;34(7):551–62.
  50. O’Donnell A, Anderson P, Newbury-Birch D, et al. The impact of brief alcohol interventions in primary healthcare: A systematic review of reviews. Alcohol Alcohol 2013;49(1):66–78.
  51. Margolis SA, Ypinazar VA, Muller R. The impact of supply reduction through alcohol management plans on serious injury in remote indigenous communities in remote Australia: A ten-year analysis using data from the Royal Flying Doctor Service. Alcohol Alcohol 2008;43(1):104–10.
  52. Liu T, Ferris J, Higginson A, Lynham A. Systematic review of Australian policing interventions to reduce alcohol-related violence – A maxillofacial perspective. Addict Behav Rep 2016;4:1–12. National Preventative Health Taskforce Workgroup. Technical report 3: Preventing alcohol-related harm in Australia: A window of opportunity. Canberra: National Preventative Health Taskforce, 2009.