HbA1c has been the gold standard for monitoring long-term glycaemic management since 1976, and it is one method used to diagnose diabetes. HbA1c testing should be performed routinely at initial assessment. Monitoring is usually recommended at three-month intervals (four per year); however, with stable diabetes, a six-month interval may be appropriate.
HbA1c measurement and natural test variation
HbA1c can be measured and reported using two different standards:
- as a percentage measure of the glycated N‐terminal residue of the β-chain of haemoglobin (eg 7%)
- in units of mmol/mol, according to the International Federation of Clinical Chemistry (IFCC) standardised reporting (eg 53 mmol/mol).
In Australia, the variability in laboratory HbA1c test results is acceptably low.6 However, there may be some variability,7,8 which needs to be considered when monitoring long-term glucose management and that there are limitations to the utility of HbA1c in accurately reflecting day-to-day or week-to-week glycaemic variability. Conditions that affect HbA1c results also need to be considered (see below).
Conditions that affect HbA1c results
A number of conditions can cause HbA1c discordance, where HbA1c does not accurately reflect mean blood glucose.
Any condition that shortens erythrocyte survival or decreases mean erythrocyte age will falsely lower HbA1c test results, regardless of the assay method used.
The presence of abnormal haemoglobin variants can occur in people of Mediterranean, African or South-East Asian heritage. Screening for haemoglobinopathies before HbA1c testing should be considered.8 If a haemoglobinopathy is suspected, then haemoglobin electrophoresis is suggested.
Some important clinical situations may indicate the presence of a haemoglobinopathy, such as when:
- results of SMBG have a poor correlation with HbA1c results
- an HbA1c result is discordant with measured alternative laboratory glycaemic values
- an HbA1c result is >15% or <4%
- a person’s HbA1c test result is radically different from a previous test result following a change in laboratory HbA1c measurement methods.
Other causes of HbA1c discordance are presented in Box 1.
Alternative forms of diabetes monitoring, such as SMBG, CGM and flash glucose monitoring (refer to ‘Use of technology in type 2 diabetes management’), should be considered for people with conditions that can affect HbA1c results.
Note that fructosamine as an alternative longer-term glucose measure may not be suitable in people with iron deficiency anaemia, because this condition raises both HbA1c and fructosamine; conversely, iron infusion spuriously lowers both HbA1c and fructosamine.9–11
The shorter fructosamine time window is not sufficient for determining a long-term prognosis.1 The fructosamine test measures glycated proteins (not glycated haemoglobin) that circulate in the blood for only 14–21 days. Anything affecting serum proteins may invalidate the test.12
Box 1. Other causes of HbA1c discordance
Abnormally low HbA1c can be caused by:
- anaemia
- haemolytic anaemia – congenital (eg spherocytosis, elliptocytosis)
- haemoglobinopathies
- acquired haemolytic anaemias (eg drug-induced, such as with dapsone, methyldopa)
- recovery from acute blood loss
- blood transfusions, iron infusions
- chronic blood loss
- chronic renal failure (variable)
- advanced liver disease and cirrhosis.13
Abnormally high HbA1c can be caused by:
- iron deficiency anaemia9
- splenectomy
- alcoholism.14
HbA1c is an unreliable measure of glycaemic management in the first four weeks of pregnancy.
Advantages and limitations of HbA1c
Clinical management of diabetes has been using HbA1c as a marker for healthy goals, complication prevention and management. However, HbA1c may be affected by various clinical physiological and pathological conditions, and this measure may lack sensitivity related to in-day and between-day glucose variability. Because HbA1c only provides an ‘average’ measure related to HbA1c over the past two to three months, various glycaemic excursion patterns may lead to the same HbA1c result, thus not accurately reflecting periods spent in hypoglycaemia and hyperglycaemia.15–18