Management of type 2 diabetes: A handbook for general practice

Defining and diagnosing type 2 diabetes

Download chapter

Last revised: 17 Sep 2020

Grade: C

Individuals who are not at high risk of type 2 diabetes should be screened for risk of diabetes every three years from 40 years of age using the Australian type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool (AUSDRISK)

Grade: Good Practice Point

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people should be screened annually with blood testing (fasting plasma glucose, random venous glucose or glycated haemoglobin [HbA1c]) from 18 years of age

Individuals with any one of the following risk factors:

  • AUSDRISK score of ≥12
  • all people with a history of a previous cardiovascular event (acute myocardial infarction or stroke)
  • women with a history of gestational diabetes mellitus
  • women with polycystic ovary syndrome
  • patients on antipsychotic drugs

should be screened

  • with fasting blood glucose (FBG) or HbA1c (Grade B)
  • every 3 years (Grade C)
Individuals with impaired glucose tolerance test or fasting glucose (not limited by age) should be screened:
  • with FBG or HbA1c (Grade B)
  • every 12 months (Grade C)
These recommendations are drawn from the most recent recommendations from organisations including the National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC), the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN), Diabetes Canada, the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and other relevant sources. Refer to ‘Explanation and source of recommendations’ for explanations of the levels and grades of evidence.

Diabetes is a group of disorders and the 10th leading cause of death in Australia.3 There are four clinical classes of diabetes:4

  • type 1 diabetes – results from ß-cell destruction due to an autoimmune process usually leading to insulin deficiency
  • type 2 diabetes – results from a progressive insulin secretory defect on the background of insulin resistance
  • gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) – defined as glucose intolerance with onset or first recognition during pregnancy
  • other specific types of diabetes – for example, monogenic diabetes and diabetes secondary to other causes (refer below).

Type 2 diabetes is a chronic and progressive medical condition that results from two major metabolic dysfunctions: insulin resistance followed by pancreatic islet cell dysfunction, causing a relative insulin deficiency. These occur due to modifiable lifestyle-related risk factors interacting with non-modifiable and genetic risk factors.5

The relative insulin deficiency leads to chronic hyperglycaemia and multiple disturbances in carbohydrate, protein and fat metabolism.5

Type 2 diabetes is the most common form of diabetes in Australia. Five per cent of adults have a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes, although this is likely to be an underestimate of the true prevalence.6 Additionally, almost one in six adults are affected by impaired glucose tolerance (IGT) or impaired fasting glucose (IFG).3

Clinical suspicion for type 2 diabetes needs to remain high, as type 2 diabetes is often asymptomatic and is increasingly developing in younger people (refer to the section ‘Early-onset type 2 diabetes’).4 Causes of secondary diabetes, such as diseases of the exocrine pancreas (eg pancreatic cancer, cystic fibrosis, haemochromatosis), metabolic, or drug-induced causes (eg treatment of human immunodeficiency virus [HIV]), should also be considered in the presence of symptoms suggestive of diabetes.3

Type 2 diabetes in specific populations

There is a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes among Australians from lower socioeconomic backgrounds compared with higher socioeconomic groups,6 and certain ethnic groups are more at risk: people with Pacific Islander, Southern European or Asian backgrounds are more than twice as likely as other Australians to develop diabetes within five years.7

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people are almost four times more likely to have diabetes than non-Indigenous Australians,6 and type 2 diabetes is a direct or indirect cause of 20% of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people deaths.8 Furthermore, the average age of diabetes onset is younger for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people than non-Indigenous Australians,9 and in some populations, Aboriginal children and adolescents have rates of type 2 diabetes that are 6–20 times higher than non-Indigenous youth.10

Assessing diabetes risk

Patients should be assessed for diabetes risk every three years from 40 years of age using the Australian type 2 diabetes risk assessment tool (AUSDRISK; Table 1).1

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander point

Given the high background prevalence of type 2 diabetes in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults, AUSDRISK has limited use as a screening tool in this population.

Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander people should instead proceed directly to blood testing for diabetes, in conjunction with other opportunistic screening (such as for cardiovascular risk assessment) from 18 years of age.2

An AUSDRISK score of ≥12 or more is considered ‘high risk’ for developing type 2 diabetes (Table 1). The following people are also considered at high risk, regardless of AUDRISK score:1,11

  • people aged ≥40 years who are overweight or obese
  • people of any age with IGT or IFG
  • people with a first-degree relative with diabetes
  • all patients with a history of a cardiovascular event (eg acute myocardial infarction, angina, peripheral vascular disease or stroke)
  • people of high-risk ethnicity/background (eg Pacific Islands, Indian subcontinent)
  • women with a history of GDM
  • women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)
  • people taking antipsychotic medication
  • Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander people.

It is recommended that all patients at high risk are tested every three years for diabetes with either FBG or HbA1c (refer to ‘Diagnosing diabetes in asymptomatic patients’).1,11 People with IGT or IFG should be tested annually.1 For recommended management of people at high risk of developing diabetes, refer to the section ‘Preventing progression to type 2 diabetes’.

Refer to the section ‘Type 2 diabetes, reproductive health and pregnancy’ for recommendations on screening in pregnancy.

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander point

Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander adults who are obese are seven times as likely as those of normal weight or underweight to have diabetes (17% compared with 2.4%).2

The AusDiab study found that body mass index (BMI), waist circumference and waist-to-hip ratio all had similar correlations with diabetes and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk.12 However, a later study of diabetes risk in an Aboriginal community found that in women, central obesity (defined as waist circumference ≥88 cm) or BMI ≥25 kg/m2 were better predictors of type 2 diabetes and CVD risk; many women with ‘normal’ BMIs were found to be centrally obese. For men, a BMI ≥25 kg/m2 was a better predictor than BMI ≥30 or waist circumference ≥102 cm.13

Table 1.

Table 1.

 AUSDRISK tool for assessing type 2 diabetes risk7

Impaired fasting glucose and impaired glucose tolerance

The definition of diabetes is based on a collection of symptoms and agreed glycaemic measures associated with escalating retinopathy risk. Patients with elevated glucose not high enough to be diagnosed with type 2 diabetes might have either IFG or IGT, also known as ‘dysglycaemic states’ or ‘intermediate hyperglycaemia’. IFG is identified by a FBG test, and IGT can be identified by a two-hour oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) – refer to Figure 1.14

These states are not considered benign, and they reflect a risk of developing diabetes in the future; however, IFG and IGT have been shown to regress over three years in 18% of cases, if patients follow standard (ie non-intensive) lifestyle recommendations.15

As CVD risk is distributed across a continuum of post-challenge glucose levels, any degree of post-challenge hyperglycaemia may be associated with the development of premature CVD.16

Refer also to the section ‘Preventing progression to type 2 diabetes’.

Three laboratory tests can be used to diagnose type 2 diabetes:

  • FBG
  • HbA1c
  • OGTT.

Notes about the use of each in making a diagnosis can be found in Table 2.

Diagnostic criteria differ depending on whether a patient is symptomatic or asymptomatic (refer below). Asymptomatic patients should be assessed for diabetes risk prior to testing, and screened as shown in Figure 1.

 Diagnostic tests for type 2 diabetes

Table 2.

Diagnostic tests for type 2 diabetes

Figure 1.

Figure 1.

Screening and diagnosing type 2 diabetes in asymptomatic people1,21–23

Diagnosing diabetes in symptomatic patients

The presence of symptoms suggestive of hyperglycaemia (refer below to ‘Clinical symptoms suggestive of diabetes’) with one of the following is confirmatory of a diagnosis of diabetes:

  • a patient presenting with hyperglycaemic crisis
  • a single elevated FBG ≥7.0 mmol/L
  • single HbA1c ≥6.5%
  • a random blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L.

A second laboratory test is not required to confirm the diagnosis, unless diagnostic uncertainty remains.

Clinical symptoms suggestive of diabetes

Symptoms of diabetes include:

  • lethargy, polyuria, polydipsia
  • frequent fungal or bacterial infections
  • blurred vision
  • loss of sensation (ie touch, vibration, cold)
  • poor wound healing
  • weight loss.

Clinical signs of insulin resistance

Signs of insulin resistance may include the following:24

  • Acanthosis nigricans – typically characterised by hyperpigmentation (darkening of skin pigment) and usually accompanied by a velvety change in texture of the affected skin. Common sites are the neck and axillae.
  • Skin tags – benign (non-cancerous) skin growths on the body or face. They can be smooth or wrinkled, skin-coloured or just slightly darker than skin colour and can vary in size.
  • Central obesity – defined by a high waist-to-hip ratio, waist-to-thigh ratio and waist circumference.
  • Hirsutism – excess facial and body hair, particularly on women.

Box 1 provides information about testing insulin levels.

Box 1. Testing insulin levels to assess insulin resistance

  • There is no role for routinely testing insulin levels to assess insulin resistance in IGT, IFG or in the evaluation of type 2 diabetes.
  • Patients with signs of insulin resistance should be screened for diabetes with FBG or HbA1c.

Diagnosing diabetes in asymptomatic patients

People who do not have symptoms of hyperglycaemia but who fall in the high-risk categories cited above, or people for whom there is clinical suspicion of diabetes, should be tested using FBG, HbA1c or OGTT (Box 2).

A second concordant laboratory result is required to confirm a diagnosis of diabetes in asymptomatic patients (Figure 1). It is recommended that the same laboratory test be repeated, using a new blood sample, for a greater likelihood of concurrence.

Box 2. Diagnostic criteria for type 2 diabetes in asymptomatic patients

  • HbA1c ≥6.5% (48 mmol/mol) on two separate occasions


  • FBG ≥7.0 mmol/L or random blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L confirmed by a second abnormal FBG on a separate day


  • OGTT before (fasting) and two hours after an oral 75 g glucose load is taken. Diabetes is diagnosed as FBG ≥7.0 mmol/L or two-hour post-challenge blood glucose ≥11.1 mmol/L

These tests are undertaken on venous blood samples.

Discordant testing

Due to the different physiological measures of glycaemia, confirmatory tests at times may give discordant results, especially if the second diagnostic test used is not the same as the initial one. For example, HbA1c levels may not be elevated in acute glycaemic states in newly diagnosed diabetes, such that a value of <6.5% (48 mmol/mol) does not exclude diabetes in the presence of an elevated blood glucose testing (≥7.0 mmol/L fasting or ≥11.1 mmol/L random).

When the results of more than one type of test are discordant, the result that is above the diagnostic cut-off point should be repeated to make the diagnosis.

Problems with the testing process, such as incorrect fasting or laboratory error, can also lead to discordant results.

Alternative types of diabetes include the following.

Type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes is typically considered a disease of children and the young; however, the majority of people with type 1 diabetes are adults, and as many as 42% of type 1 diabetes cases have their onset in people between 30 and 60 years of age.25

Consider type 1 diabetes if there is the presence of:

  • ketosis/ketonuria (which may be absent)
  • polyuria, polydipsia
  • acute weight loss (>5% in less than four weeks)
  • <50 years of age
  • personal and family history of autoimmune disease
  • acute onset of symptoms.

If suspicious of type 1 diabetes:

  • Management of hyperglycaemia should not be delayed, and should include immediate assessment for possible ketosis and metabolic disorders such as hyperosmolar states while seeking specialist endocrinology assessment. If blood ketone level is >1.5 mmol/L, seek help immediately. Blood ketones >0.5 mmol/L are abnormal in the presence of hyperglycaemia. Refer to the RACGP’s position statement on emergency management of hyperglycaemia in primary care.
  • Consider non-urgent confirmatory tests for glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) and/or insulinoma antigen-2 (IA-2) antibodies. These will be present in 90% of patients with type 1 diabetes. When measuring antibodies, higher rates of false negative results occur early in the development of type 1 diabetes. However, false negative results decrease when two different antibody tests are measured.
  • Consider testing for plasma C-peptide level.26 Levels <0.2 nmol/L on non-fasting sampling support the diagnosis of type 1 diabetes; however, the diagnostic accuracy of this test varies in early-onset type 1 diabetes. Specialist endocrinology evaluation will assist in the case of diagnostic uncertainty.

Latent autoimmune diabetes of adults

Latent autoimmune diabetes of adults (LADA – also called ‘type 1.5’ diabetes) is diabetes with ß-islet cell antibodies that occurs more commonly in adulthood. LADA often presents similarly to type 2 diabetes, but it involves a more rapid course of ß-cell destruction, a poorer metabolic response to non-insulin therapy and a more rapid progression to requiring insulin to control hyperglycaemia due to ß-cell failure.27

Monogenic diabetes

Monogenic diabetes is a collection of single-gene mutation disorders that account for 1–2% of diabetes cases. Cases usually develop before 25 years of age and are often non-insulin requiring. Monogenic diabetes can be misdiagnosed as either type 1 or type 2 diabetes.28

Monogenic diabetes is genetically heterogeneous, but all forms are dominantly inherited, unless they occur as a result of a de novo mutation. There is variance among the forms, with two main types: neonatal diabetes mellitus, occurring in the first six months of life (rare), and maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY). MODY subtypes may vary in the severity of hyperglycaemia. The most prevalent subtypes are due to mutations in the genes HNF1A, GCK and HNF4A. Not all forms of the MODY phenotype have yet been defined.29 Suspected cases should be referred to a specialist endocrinologist, and management options and possible genetic diagnosis should be considered.30

Gestational diabetes mellitus

Refer to the section ‘Gestational diabetes mellitus’.

  1. Colagiuri S, Davies D, Girgis S, Colagiuri R. National evidence based guideline for case detection and diagnosis of type 2 diabetes. Canberra: Diabetes Australia and the National Health and Medical Research Council, 2009.
  2. National Aboriginal Community Controlled Health Organisation and The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. National guide to a preventive health assessment for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people. 3rd edn. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2018.
  3. Shaw J, Tanamas S, editors. Diabetes: The silent pandemic and its impact on Australia. Melbourne: Baker IDI Heart and Diabetes Institute, 2012.
  4. American Diabetes Association. Classification and diagnosis of diabetes. Diabetes Care 2019;42:S13–S28.
  5. Nolan C, Damm P, Prentki M. Type 2 diabetes across generations: From pathophysiology to prevention and management. Lancet 2011;378(9786):169–81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60614-4.
  6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Diabetes. Cat. no. CVD 82. Canberra: AIHW, 2019.
  7. Chen L, Magliano DJ, Balkau B, et al. AUSDRISK: An Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool based on demographic, lifestyle and simple anthropometric measures. Med J Aust 2010;192(4):197–202.
  8. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. The health and welfare of Australia’s Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples 2015. Cat. no. IHW 147. Canberra: AIHW, 2015.
  9. Azzopardi P, Brown A, Zimmet P, et al. Type 2 diabetes in young Indigenous Australians in rural and remote areas: Diagnosis, screening, management and prevention. Med J Aust 2012;197 (1):32–36.
  10. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Type 2 diabetes in Australia’s children and young people: A working paper. Diabetes Series no. 21. Cat. no. CVD 64. Canberra: AIHW, 2014.
  11. The Royal Australian College of General Practitioners. Guidelines for preventive activities in general practice. 9th edn. East Melbourne, Vic: RACGP, 2016.
  12. Daniel M, Rowley K, McDermott R, Mylvaganam A, O’Dea K. Diabetes incidence in an Australian Aboriginal population. An 8-year follow-up study. Diabetes Care 1999;22(12):1993–98.
  13. Bambrick H. Relationships between BMI, waist circumference, hypertension and fasting glucose: Rethinking risk factors in Indigenous diabetes. Australian Indigenous Health Bulletin 2005;5.
  14. Barry E, Roberts S, Oke J, Vijayaraghavan S, Normansell R, Greenhalgh T. Efficacy and effectiveness of screen and treat policies in prevention of type 2 diabetes: Systematic review and meta-analysis of screening tests and interventions. BMJ 2017;356:i6538.
  15. Perreault L, Kahn S, Christophi C, Knowler WC, Hamman RF; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Regression from pre-diabetes to normal glucose regulation in the Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Care 2009;32(9):1583–88.
  16. Twigg SM, Kamp MC, Davis TM, et al. Prediabetes: A position statement from the Australian Diabetes Society and Australian Diabetes Educators Association. Med J Aust 2007;186(9):461–65.
  17. Sugimoto T, Hashimoto M, Hayakawa I, et al. Alterations in HbA1c resulting from the donation of autologous blood for elective surgery in patients with diabetes mellitus. Blood Transfus 2014;12:S209–S13.
  18. Schindler C, Birkenfeld A, Hanefeld M, et al. Intravenous ferric carboxymaltose in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and iron deficiency: CLEVER trial study and design protocol. Diabetes Ther 2018;9(1):37–47.
  19. Selvin E, Steffes MW, Zhu H, et al. Glycated hemoglobin, diabetes, and cardiovascular risk in nondiabetic adults. N Engl J Med 2010;362(9):800–11.
  20. Sarwar N, Aspelund T, Eiriksdottir G, et al. Markers of dysglycaemia and risk of coronary heart disease in people without diabetes: Reykjavik prospective study and systematic review. PLoS Med 2010;7:e1000278.
  21. World Health Organization. Use of glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: WHO, 2011.
  22. d’Emden MC, Shaw JE, Colman PG, et al. The role of HbA1c in the diagnosis of diabetes mellitus in Australia. Med J Aust 2012;197(4):220–21.
  23. Diabetes Canada Clinical Practice Guidelines Expert Committee. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and management of diabetes in Canada. Can J Diabetes 2018;42:S1–S325.
  24. Gonzalez-Saldivar G, Rodriguez-Gutierrez R, Ocampo-Candiani J, González-González JG, Gómez-Flores M. Skin manifestations of insulin resistance: From a biochemical stance to a clinical diagnosis and management. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb) 2017;7(1):37–51.
  25. Thomas N, Jones S, Weedon M, et al. Frequency and phenotype of type 1 diabetes in the first six decades of life: A cross-sectional, genetically stratified survival analysis from UK Biobank. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol 2018;6(2):122–29.
  26. Jones AG, Hattersley AT. The clinical utility of C-peptide measurement in the care of patients with diabetes. Diabet Med 2013;30:803–17.
  27. Naik RG, Brooks-Worrell BM, Palmer JP. Latent autoimmune diabetes in adults. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2009;94:4635–44.
  28. Amed S, Oram R. Maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): Making the right diagnosis to optimize treatment. Can J Diabetes 2016;40:449–54.
  29. Timsit J, Saint-Martin C, Dubois-Laforgue D, Bellanné-Chantelot C. Searching for maturity-onset diabetes of the young (MODY): When and what for? Can J Diabetes 2016;40(5):455–61.
  30. Kavvoura FK, Owen KR. Maturity onset diabetes of the young: Clinical characteristics, diagnosis and management. Pediatr Endocrinol Rev 2012;10:234–42.