Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander family abuse and violence in context
This chapter discusses Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander FAV. In this chapter we refer to the commonly used Australian Human Rights Equality Commission definition of family violence because it is inclusive of cultural and spiritual abuse:8
‘Family violence involves any use of force, be it physical or non-physical, which is aimed at controlling another family or community member and which undermines that person’s well-being. It can be directed towards an individual, family, community or particular group. Family violence is not limited to physical forms of abuse, and also includes cultural and spiritual abuse. There are interconnecting and trans-generational experiences of violence within Indigenous families and communities.’
It is important to recognise that FAV is not part of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander culture.5,9 Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander FAV is complex, and is influenced by historical factors inherent with European settlement.5 (Figure 16.1).
It is accepted that high levels of FAV in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities are attributable to the many interrelated elements that are associated with colonisation, kinship disruption, disconnection from land and culture, and constant trauma.5
Factors such as unemployment, poverty and over-incarceration of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples also contribute to higher rates of violence.9 Furthermore, trauma is complex for Australia’s Indigenous populations, particularly when they have been denied the ability to grieve and heal for a long time.10
To learn more about intergenerational trauma, watch this short video from the Healing Foundation.
One form of violence stemming from colonisation is lateral violence. The term ‘lateral violence’ describes the way people in positions of powerlessness, covertly or overtly, direct their dissatisfaction ‘inward’: towards each other, towards themselves, and towards less-powerful family members – older people, women and especially children.11 Lateral violence occurs worldwide in all minority communities. It has grown in prominence in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities in recent years.
Healthcare providers such as GPs and practice nurses need to understand that the removal of children and many subsequent policies have created mistrust of governments, policy-makers and the healthcare profession.5,9 Although all FAV victims/survivors have reasons for avoiding help-seeking, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples have additional reasons than non-Indigenous Australians.4,12 Barriers specific to Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples include shame, fear and culturally inappropriate service provision.
Recent evidence suggests that Indigenous peoples (globally) report poor experiences with healthcare providers when accessing care for FAV.2 A lack of cultural awareness, problems with communication, mistrust and perceiving the environment to be unsafe contribute to the poor experiences and expectations reported.2
GPs, primary healthcare teams and Aboriginal health services have a role in changing this outcome.
Prevalence
FAV in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities across Australia is disproportionately high in comparison to the non-Indigenous Australian population.13,14 Additionally, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women are more likely to experience serious forms of violence such as physical assault.14 FAV is the biggest single factor contributing to the disparities in health outcomes between Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and non-Indigenous women.13 An example of this is higher rates of hospitalisation: in some parts of Australia, 73% of mothers admitted to hospital because of FAV were identified as Aboriginal.15
Despite the higher rates of violence, the 2014–15 National Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Social Survey found that only one in four women who are physically injured seek help from a healthcare professional.
FAV is also responsible for 34% of the total fatal burden observed in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women, a rate that is 10% higher than women who do not identify as Indigenous.16
Although the main victims/survivors of FAV are women and children, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men are also at increased risk of being victims of family violence, and are nine times more likely than non-Indigenous counterparts to be hospitalised from family-violence related assault (refer to Table 16.1).17
Table 16.1. Male hospitalisation rates for family violence-related assaults, by Indigenous status, 2014–1517 |
|
Rate of assaults (per 100 000 population)
|
Age group (years)
|
Indigenous
|
Non-Indigenous
|
0–14
|
42.1
|
5.1
|
15–24
|
166.8
|
11.4
|
25–34
|
415.7
|
13.6
|
35–44
|
431.8
|
12.7
|
45–54
|
285.2
|
10.4
|
55–64
|
106.2
|
7.5
|
65+
|
47.4
|
6.0
|
Source: based on Steering Committee for the Review of Government Service Provision data, Overcoming Indigenous Disadvantage 2016
Much of the violence perpetrated against Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women comes from men from a broad range of backgrounds; it is not always perpetrated by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men.
The relationships of the people who are perpetrating the abuse and violence in Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families can be complex. As shown in Figure 16.2, people who use or experience FAV can be family members of all sorts, other community members, or even a date.