Skip to main content

Skin cancer

July 2012

FocusSkin cancer

Dermatoscopy in routine practice

'Chaos and Clues'

Volume 41, No.7, July 2012 Pages 482-487

Dermatoscopy in routine practiceCliff Rosendahl MBBS, is a general practitioner, Capalaba and lecturer, the School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland.

Alan Cameron MBBS, is Senior Lecturer, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland

Ian McColl MbChB, FACD, is a specialist dermatologist, Tugun, Queensland

David Wilkinson BSc(Hons), MbChB, MSc, PhD, DSC, FRACGP, FAFPHM, FRCP, is Dean of Medicine and Head, School of Medicine, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland.

Background

Skin cancer is a major cause of mortality and morbidity in Australia, and primary care doctors can, and should, treat most cases.

Objective

In this article we outline one method for the effective use of dermatoscopy in diagnosing melanoma and other skin malignancies in general practice.

Discussion

The use of a dermatoscope in clinical practice has been shown to increase diagnostic accuracy and is considered the standard of care in assessing patients with pigmented skin lesions. Its use is also being increasingly applied to the diagnosis of nonpigmented skin lesions. Like any clinical tool, training is required for effective use. ‘Chaos and clues’ is a straightforward method of rapidly assessing suspicious pigmented skin lesions using a dermatoscope; its use can lead to improved diagnosis of melanoma and other skin malignancies.

Nearly 1500 Australians die each year from melanoma.1 While primary prevention may see this number fall in coming decades, the best way to prevent these deaths today is to diagnose and excise melanomas before they metastasise. Early diagnosis should also reduce morbidity from other skin malignancies. Every clinical examination, regardless of its primary purpose, is an opportunity to detect melanoma and other skin cancers early.

Skilled use of dermatoscopy has been shown to increase diagnostic accuracy for both melanocytic and nonmelanocytic skin malignancies2–5 and this improvement can be seen with surprisingly short training periods.6 The evidence for dermatoscopy is such that it is now regarded as standard of care for the management of pigmented skin lesions.7 As general practitioners manage over half of the skin cancer cases in Australia,8 they should be as familiar with using the dermatoscope as the stethoscope, and this familiarity is within the reach of all interested practitioners.

Dermatoscopes and dermatoscopy

A dermatoscope is more than a magnifying lens and light source. By eliminating reflection from the skin surface, the dermatoscope allows better visualisation of the patterns formed by pigment and blood vessels – critical features in the diagnosis of skin lesions. This can be done using fluid to couple the lens to the skin or by cross-polarisation of light source and lens. Colour rendition varies with the different types of instruments,9 hence familiarity with your chosen device is important.

How can I use dermatoscopy to enhance my practice?

There are no evidence based guidelines about what lesions to examine, but we believe 'the more, the better'. Some lesions, such as unequivocal seborrhoeic keratosis, can be diagnosed by their macroscopic appearance, but all visible lesions that cannot be confidently diagnosed should be examined with a dermatoscope. Any lesion that 'breaks the pattern' of the patient's other lesions – by being isolated, larger or just 'different' – needs careful examination. Pattern recognition applies at all levels of lesion assessment: clinical, dermatoscopic and histological. Malignant tissue behaves and grows chaotically. Therefore a lesion that appears different to other lesions clinically may also show asymmetry and disorder when viewed by the clinician with a dermatoscope or by the pathologist with a microscope.

While dermatoscopy is increasingly being applied successfully to the diagnosis of nonpigmented lesions,10,11 this article considers only pigmented lesions.

How do I interpret the dermatoscopic image?

With respect to diagnostic algorithms it has been stated: 'A method which cannot be taught is barely a method at all'. We agree that a teachable and tested method of dermatoscopic diagnosis is superior to an intuitive approach.

Published methods of dermatoscopic diagnosis include: the classic pattern analysis,12 CASH,13 the ABCD method of dermatoscopy,14 the 7-point checklist,15 the Menzies method,16 the 3-point checklist',17 the revised pattern analysis18 and a short modification of revised pattern analysis called 'chaos and clues'.5 Most of these methods involve numerical calculations, and only revised pattern analysis and chaos and clues have been assessed for all pigmented skin malignancies, including the nonmelanocytic ones: pigmented basal cell carcinoma (pBCC) and pigmented squamous cell carcinoma (pSCC). pSCC in situ – also known as pigmented intra-epidermal carcinoma (pIEC) is a lesion that commonly mimics melanoma.

The chaos and clues algorithm was evaluated in a study of 463 consecutively treated pigmented skin lesions (including 29 melanomas, 20 of which were in situ) in a general practice in Australia and was found to have a sensitivity of 90.6% and a specificity of 62.7% for the diagnosis of malignancy of any type.5

The structure of the chaos and clues algorithm and its use in everyday practice is simple. It starts with the method and language used to describe lesions, the same method and language that was developed for the revised pattern analysis.18

There are only five basic elements used to describe pigmented structures, which are objectively defined using the following geometric terms (Figure 1):

  • line: a two dimensional continuous object with length greatly exceeding width
  • pseudopod: a line with a bulbous end
  • circle: a curved line equidistant from a central point
  • clod: any well circumscribed, solid object larger than a dot; clods may take any shape
  • dot: an object too small to have a discernable shape.
Figure 1. Structures seen with a dermatoscope

Figure 1. Structures seen with a dermatoscope
Lines (A), pseudopods (B), circles (C), clods (D), dots (E). Lines can be reticular (F), branched (G), parallel (H), radial (I), curved (J)

Lines are further classified into five types: reticular, branched, parallel, radial and curved, as these have diagnostic significance.

Blood vessels are also described using similar well defined terminology19 (Figure 2).

Figure 2. Vessel patterns

Figure 2. Vessel patterns
Vessel structure (left): dots (A), clods (B), lines (C), looped (D), curved (E), serpentine (F), helical (G), coiled (H)
Vessel arrangement (right): random (A), clustered (B), serpiginous (C), linear (D), centred (E), radial (F), reticular (G), branched (H)

A pattern is formed by multiple repetitions of a basic element over a sufficient portion of a lesion to be recognised on a rapid scanning assessment. An area large enough to constitute a pattern, but with no basic element dominating, is called 'structureless'.

In contrast to patterns, a clue to malignancy may be a small feature whose detection requires close inspection.

Colour has great diagnostic significance in dermatoscopy. The main pigments are melanin and haemoglobin, and the colours produced are shown in Figure 3. Although melanin is black, it appears as different colours depending on how deeply in the skin it is located.20 Very superficially it looks black, but deeper in the epidermis it appears brown. In the dermis, melanin appears either grey or blue. Therefore in many circumstances, these colours indicate the presence of melanin pigment deeper in the skin than expected, which can be a clue to invasive malignancy.

Figure 3. The interpretation of colours seen with a dermatoscope

Figure 3. The interpretation of colours seen with a dermatoscope

Chaos and Clues

The chaos and clues algorithm9 is shown in Figure 4.

Figure 4. The chaos and clues algorithm

Figure 4. The chaos and clues algorithm
* Exceptions: changing lesions on adults, dermatoscopic grey on head or neck, pigmented nodular lesions, parallel ridge pattern (palms or soles)

Chaos

The first step is to dermatoscopically assess the pigmented lesion for 'chaos', defined as 'asymmetry of structure or colour'. Chaos is assessed by pattern not shape (Figure 5a–d). As perfect symmetry is biologically rare, some deviation from geometrical symmetry must be expected. It is helpful to imagine a piece of carpet that can be cut in any shape but which maintains a uniform pattern. It would be regarded as having no chaos regardless of how irregular the shape was and regardless of the presence of a little dust on one part.

If no chaos is present, with the exceptions listed in Figure 4, the examiner moves to the next lesion. With increasing experience the assessment of chaos can be performed more rapidly.

If chaos is present, the examiner then searches carefully for eight clues to malignancy. If one or more of these clues are found, an adequate (preferably excisional) biopsy is performed unless an unequivocal diagnosis of seborrhoeic keratosis can be made by pattern analysis.

Figure 5. Four lesions encountered on the one patient

Figure 5. Four lesions encountered on the one patient
Lesions A, B and C are symmetrical (lack chaos) when shape is disregarded.
Lesion D is asymmetrical (exhibits chaos) and had the clue to malignancy of pseudopods (arrow). An in situ melanoma was diagnosed

The eight clues to malignancy

The following eight clues to malignancy are featured in Figure 6 and 7.

201207Rosendahl-fig-6

Figure 6. Clues to malignancy in melanomas numbered according to the flowchart
1 – eccentric structureless (blue),
2 – thick lines reticular (arrow),
3 – grey dots,
4 – black dots, peripheral,
5 – radial lines, segmental (arrow),
6 – white lines,
7 – polymorphous vessels,
8 – parallel ridge pattern

Figure 7. Clues to malignancy in nonmelanocytic pigmented malignancies

Figure 7. Clues to malignancy in nonmelanocytic pigmented malignancies numbered according to the flowchart
1 – eccentric structureless (white) in a pIEC,
3 – blue clods in a pBCC,
5a and 5b – lines radial segmental (arrows) in two pBCCs,
6 – white lines in a pBCC,
7 – polymorphous vessels in a pBCC

Eccentric structureless area – any colour except skin colour

Structureless zones are commonly found centrally in benign lesions (most commonly congenital naevi and dermatofibromas). When not located centrally, a structureless zone is a clue to malignancy. It can occur in melanoma, pBCC and pIEC.

Thick lines reticular or branched

When the reticular and branched patterns are seen in benign lesions, the lines that form the pattern are clearly thinner than the spaces they enclose. When the lines are thicker than the spaces they enclose, this may be due to rete ridges being packed with melanin-laden melanocytes and it is a clue to malignancy, seen in melanoma.

Grey or blue structures

Grey or blue lines, circles, clods or dots are caused by melanin in the dermis which can be in neoplastic cells or in melanophages. In lesions with chaos, dermal melanin suggests malignancy. Grey and blue structures can occur in melanoma,21 pBCC22 or pIEC.23

Black dots or clods, peripheral

Black dots and clods are produced by aggregations of melanin in the superficial epidermis. Central black structures do occur in naevi, but when they are located peripherally they may be due to Pagetoid spread of melanin-laden melanocytes and melanoma should be suspected. This clue is not expected in pBCC or pIEC.23

Lines radial or pseudopods, segmental

Radial lines and pseudopods are seen in lesions undergoing rapid horizontal growth. When they are distributed around the entire circumference, a benign diagnosis (Reed naevus or recurrent naevus) is most likely. When radial lines occur segmentally (only some parts of the border) then melanoma or pBCC should be suspected. Radial lines converging centrally occur in pBCC, and when located centrally within a lesion converging to a central point, they are highly specific for pBCC.24 Pseudopods distributed segmentally are highly specific for melanoma.

White lines

In dermatoscopy, usually the more pigmented features are considered to form the pattern; less pigmented features are considered to constitute the 'background' against which these features are seen. The exception to this rule is white structures, which are whiter than the background they are seen against. To be considered 'white', and therefore a clue to malignancy, lines must be clearly whiter than surrounding normal skin. White lines are often due to fibrosis. Some white lines can be arranged in a perpendicular orientation to each other without crossing. These lines are brighter with polarising dermatoscopes and are specific for melanoma and pBCCs when seen in chaotic lesions.9 Extra specificity is gained by requiring reticular white lines (also known as negative or inverse network) to occur in association with pigmented reticular lines to rate as a clue.9

Polymorphous vessels

Vessels are called polymorphous when more than one pattern of vessels is seen in a lesion.19 In pigmented lesions with chaos, this is a clue to malignancy. In this context, the presence of dot vessels is suggestive of melanoma.

Lines parallel, ridges (acral) or chaotic (nails)

The typical dermatoscopic pattern of acral pigmented lesions is parallel lines, with the lines following the ridges and furrows that create palm and foot prints. Melanin pigment that is concentrated on the broader ridges which are defined by the eccrine duct openings, is a clue to melanoma even in the absence of chaos.25 While the clue of 'parallel ridge pattern' applies exclusively to pigmented lesions on acral skin, the other seven clues also still apply, even in acral lesions lacking the parallel ridge pattern.

Longitudinal nail pigmentation should always lead to a careful examination for clues to subungual melanoma.26

Case study

A woman, 31 years of age, accompanied her husband on a visit to his GP. She pulled her husband's shirt up to show the GP something she was concerned about on his back. The GP was able to reassure them about that, but a heart-shaped pigmented lesion on the wife's arm caught the GP's attention as it 'broke the pattern' by virtue of its unusual appearance (Figure 8a [arrow] and 8b). Dermatoscopy (Figure 8c) revealed what could not be appreciated with the naked eye. There was asymmetry (chaos) and the clues of grey structures (seen centrally) and lines radial, segmental (asterix). Excision biopsy was performed and the pathology reported an in situ melanoma.

Figure 8. Case study clinical view

Figure 8. Case study clinical view (A, B). Dermatoscopic appearance (C) reveals asymmetry (chaos) and the clues of grey structures (centrally) and lines radial, segmental (asterix)

Detecting symmetrical melanomas

No algorithm can have 100% accuracy and robotic adherence to even the best method will occasionally result in failure to diagnose malignancy. To reduce the risk of failure to diagnose melanoma, we have defined four exceptions to the rule that symmetrical lesions are benign.9 Any of the following lesions should be considered for biopsy unless unequivocal diagnosis of seborrhoeic keratosis can be made:

  • any changing lesion on an adult
  • any lesion on the head or neck with dermatoscopic grey appearance
  • any nodular pigmented lesion
  • any acral lesion with a parallel ridge pattern.

Possibly the biggest trap for beginners is failing to diagnose a clinically obvious malignancy because it lacks the dermatoscopic features they are expecting to see. Never be dissuaded from a confident clinical diagnosis by unimpressive dermatoscopic features.

Summary

Dermatoscopy is an essential tool for any doctor who encounters and treats skin cancer and the acquisition of a dermatoscope is the first step in a process that includes choosing a diagnostic method. A method based on objective criteria, such as chaos and clues, reduces the steepness of the learning curve and forms an excellent framework to organise growing clinical experience.

Conflict of interest: none declared.

References

  1. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2010. Cancer in Australia 2010: an overview. Cancer Series No. 60. Cat. no. CAN 56. Canberra: AIHW. Available at www.aihw.gov.au/publication–detail/?id=6442472459 [Accessed 1 October 2011].
  2. Vestergaard ME, Macaskill P, Holt PE, Menzies SW. Dermoscopy compared with naked eye examination for the diagnosis of primary melanoma: a meta-analysis of studies performed in a clinical setting. Br J Dermatol 2008;159:669–76.
  3. Kittler H, Pehamberger H, Wolff K, Binder M. Diagnostic accuracy of dermoscopy. Lancet Oncol 2002;3:159–65.
  4. Bafounta ML, Beauchet A, Aegerter P, Saiag P. Is dermoscopy (epiluminescence microscopy) useful for the diagnosis of melanoma? Results of a meta-analysis using techniques adapted to the evaluation of diagnostic tests. Arch Dermatol 2001;137:1343–50.
  5. Rosendahl C, Tschandl P, Cameron A, Kittler H. Diagnostic accuracy of dermatoscopy for melanocytic and nonmelanocytic pigmented lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 2011;64:1068–73.
  6. Westerhoff K, McCarthy WH, Menzies SW. Increase in the sensitivity for melanoma diagnosis by primary care physicians using skin surface microscopy. Br J Dermatol 2000;143:1016–20.
  7. Australian Cancer Network Melanoma Guidelines Revision Working Party. Clinical practice guidelines for the management of melanoma in Australia and New Zealand. Cancer Council Australia and Australian Cancer Network, Sydney and New Zealand Guidelines Group, Wellington 2008; p. xxii.
  8. Askew DA, Wilkinson D, Schluter PJ, Eckert K. Skin cancer surgery in Australia 2001–2005: the changing role of the general practitioner. Med J Aust 2007;187:210–4.
  9. Kittler H, Rosendahl C, Cameron A, Tschandl P. Dermatoscopy. Facultas Verlags-und Buchhandels AG facultas. wuv Universitätsverlag, Austria, 2011.
  10. Zalaudek I, Kreusch J, Giacomel J, Ferrara G, Catricala C, Argenziano G. How to diagnose nonpigmented skin tumors: review of vascular structures seen with dermatoscopy, part I. Melanocytic skin tumors. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;63:361–74; quiz 375–6.
  11. Zalaudek I, Kreusch J, Giacomel J, Ferrara G, Catricala C, Argenziano G. How to diagnose nonpigmented skin tumors: a review of vascular structures seen with dermatoscopy, part II. Nonmelanocytic skin tumors. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;63:377–86; quiz 387–8.
  12. Pehamberger H, Steiner A, Wolff K. In vivo epiluminescence microscopy of pigmented skin lesions, I: pattern analysis of pigmented skin lesions. J Am Acad Dermatol 1987;17:571–83.
  13. Henning JS, Dusza SW, Wang SQ, et al. The CASH (color, architecture, symmetry, and homogeneity) algorithm for dermoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 2007;56:45–52.
  14. Nachbar F, Stolz W, Merkle T, et al. The ABCD rule of dermatoscopy. J Am Acad Dermatol 1994;30:551–9.
  15. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, et al. Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermatoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol 1998;134:1563–70.
  16. Menzies SW, Ingvar C, Crotty K, McCarthy W. Frequency and morphologic characteristics of invasive melanomas lacking specific surface microscopic features. Arch Dermatol1996;132:1178–82.
  17. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S, et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Dermatol 2003;48:679–93.
  18. Kittler H. Dermatoscopy: introduction of a new algorithmic method based on pattern analysis for diagnosis of pigmented skin lesions. Dermatopathology: Practical & Conceptual 2007;13:3.
  19. Kittler H, Riedl E, Rosendahl C, Cameron A. Dermatoscopy of unpigmented lesions of the skin: a new classification of vessel morphology based on pattern analysis. Dermatopathology: Practical & Conceptual 2007;14:3.
  20. Weismann K, Lorentzen HF. Dermoscopic color perspective. Arch Dermatol 2006;142:1250.
  21. Braun RP, Gaide O, Oliviero M, et al. The significance of multiple blue-grey dots (granularity) for the dermoscopic diagnosis of melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2007;157:907–13.
  22. Altamura D, Menzies SW, Argenziano G, et al. Dermatoscopy of basal cell carcinoma: morphologic variability of global and local features and accuracy of diagnosis. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;62:67–75.
  23. Cameron A, Rosendahl C, Tschandl P, Kittler H. Dermatoscopy of pigmented Bowen's disease. J Am Acad Dermatol 2010;62:597–604.
  24. Menzies SW. Dermoscopy of pigmented basal cell carcinoma. Clin Dermatol 2002;20:268–9.
  25. Saida T, Koga H, Uhara H. Key points in dermoscopic differentiation between early acral melanoma and acral nevus. J Dermatol 2011;38:25–34.
  26. Luc T, Dalle S. Dermoscopy provides useful information for the management of melanonychia striata, Dermatol Ther 2007;20:3–10.

Correspondence afp@racgp.org.au

Yes     No

Declaration of competing interests *

Yes No

Additional Author (remove)

Yes No

    

 

 

 

 

Competing Interests: 

Your comment is being submitted, please wait

Download citation in RIS format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

Download citation in BIBTEX format (RefMan)

Download citation in REFER format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

For more information see Wikipedia: Comparison of reference management software