July 2011



Application in general practice

Volume 40, No.7, July 2011 Pages 524-526

Kam Cheong Wong

Anthony M Brown

Stephen CH Li


The Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool (AUSDRISK) has been promoted since July 2008. We studied its application rate and the profile of a sample of general practice patients within Central West New South Wales from June to December 2010.


Stage one assessed the awareness and application of AUSDRISK among general practitioners and general practice registrars. In stage two, the doctors used AUSDRISK and appropriate blood tests to screen patients aged 25–74 years who had not been previously diagnosed with diabetes.


Seventy-eight doctors (response rate 45.1%) completed the survey. A total of 68.2% of general practice registrars and 23.2% of GPs were aware of AUSDRISK. Among the respondents 14.1% (95% CI: 6–22%) applied AUSDRISK in their usual practice, and 39.1% (95% CI: 31–47%) of the 151 patients had high AUSDRISK scores ≥15.


Two years after the launch of AUSDRISK, the application rate of AUSDRISK is low. In this patient population, many patients had high AUSDRISK scores.

The Australian Type 2 Diabetes Risk Assessment Tool (AUSDRISK) identifies patients at high risk of developing type 2 diabetes and consists of 10 items which assess risk factors: age, gender, country of birth, family history of diabetes, history of high blood glucose, hypertension, smoking status, fruit and vegetable intake, physical activity levels and waist circumference. Potential scores range from 0–38 and relate to the probability of developing diabetes within the next 5 years.1,2

Download the PDF for the full article.


Yes     No

Declaration of competing interests *

Yes No

Additional Author (remove)

Yes No






Competing Interests: 

Your comment is being submitted, please wait

Download citation in RIS format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

Download citation in BIBTEX format (RefMan)

Download citation in REFER format (EndNote, Zotero, RefMan, RefWorks)

For more information see Wikipedia: Comparison of reference management software